Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Maddow (aka Mrs. Selective Outrage) is a LIAR [View all]islandmkl
(5,275 posts)219. don't forget that Bill didn't have to get the most votes as in 50+%...
just the most votes...thanks, Ross Perot!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
223 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
All those that abandoned Obama for failing to magically implement their policy wishes
Chico Man
Feb 2016
#102
No magic involved. We wanted to see him actually try, not shrug his shoulders and draw lines in
GoneFishin
Feb 2016
#121
Feel you. But he was somewhat disingenuous on climate change.. allowing SoS HRC to push fracking
cleopotrick
Feb 2016
#141
It is naive to think that presidential election can have such a monumental impact.
AlbertCat
Feb 2016
#152
The Difference Between BO And Bernie Is That Bernie Actually Means What He Says...
CorporatistNation
Feb 2016
#192
free tuition, single payer, and other rainbows and unicorns are coming their way....
AlbertCat
Feb 2016
#148
It's a conspiracy! I can't tell you the amount of people involved in this... you just
boston bean
Feb 2016
#2
The corporations own the media and the hacks dance to their tune to keep their jobs. Why do you
Skwmom
Feb 2016
#4
Exactly, and handcuff is the word for it. That juicy corp. media salary
appalachiablue
Feb 2016
#128
The gravy train is long and meandering. But all the riders are making money and don't want it to
GoneFishin
Feb 2016
#125
I heard that live. It blew me away. I never imagined I would hear words of truth like that
corkhead
Feb 2016
#50
Meh, I'd say Rachel has 15, 20 million bucks and thus any financial pressure she feels is imaginary.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2016
#17
Yes and it's very heady to be in a clique, especially one with some of the most powerful
snagglepuss
Feb 2016
#146
To this, add the notion that all presidents since late 70s have been Reaganites.
immoderate
Feb 2016
#191
Money = political influence and power. No money = no influence and no power.
onecaliberal
Feb 2016
#204
I think a lot of people think that being a citizen means more than indentured servitude. nt
kristopher
Feb 2016
#207
"progressives" - LOL Only one of those ever did much beyond run their mouth. Look
jtuck004
Feb 2016
#37
So that's your answer to questions that I laid out? "I don't give a damn" about it?
Nyan
Feb 2016
#129
Shultz' numbers were horrible. I like him but his numbers were really bad.
stevenleser
Feb 2016
#194
Randi Rhodes has felt that way about Rachel Maddow since the Air America days.
Snotcicles
Feb 2016
#126
Damn ......thinking a white, male Senator from a racially homogenous state who voted to protect
msanthrope
Feb 2016
#13
I didn't say if agreed or disagreed. I merely noted that a white, male Senator who voted to
msanthrope
Feb 2016
#52
That was my first thought. Pretty sure she's not married, though in a long term relationship.
FailureToCommunicate
Feb 2016
#62
You really have to go deeper and deeper to find something to be outraged about, don't you?
randome
Feb 2016
#15
Or she has a different opinion than you. I mean that's at least a possibility, right?
randome
Feb 2016
#29
Not for them. They need a conspiracy because they want to save face and they want to create
stevenleser
Feb 2016
#215
Its funny because if Bernie did win the nomination he would be depending on
workinclasszero
Feb 2016
#84
He'd likely have to make some promises to bring them back to any measure of enthusiasm.
MADem
Feb 2016
#157
News flash yourself: I'm not the only perturbed that a formerly progressive network features Trump
brush
Feb 2016
#180
I didn't say right winger. You did. I said she stayed when the network shifted right . . .
brush
Feb 2016
#189
Rachael says what MSNBC wants her to say. She chooses to stay with the network. Sad really.
jalan48
Feb 2016
#86
Bernie Sanders is a politician. That's his occupation. He happens to be very good at it
geek tragedy
Feb 2016
#114
There are a handful of very smart, level headed and reasonable Sanders supporters here
stevenleser
Feb 2016
#218
So now Rachel Maddow is a right wing sellout. See how toxic this has become?
greenman3610
Feb 2016
#120
some people are fueled by hate. they don't represent a significant percentage of Bernie
geek tragedy
Feb 2016
#144
Why is she still on that network though, that has shifted hard to the right . . .
brush
Feb 2016
#168
I agree that Bernie is an experienced politician. How else would an Independent social democrat
Cleita
Feb 2016
#138
So many true progressives under that Sanders bus it can't drive no more. eom
MohRokTah
Feb 2016
#151
Well, for the record I haven't actually been one of those piling on the abuse...
Flying Squirrel
Feb 2016
#196
Bernie has been calling out the corporate media lately - YES RACHEL that includes you. And why
jillan
Feb 2016
#171
Everyone is corruptible by a paycheck. Comcast doesn't want Bernie. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Feb 2016
#174
Rachel Maddow doesn't always say nice things about hilary, to my ears. Both sides can't win 100%..
dubyadiprecession
Feb 2016
#179
So if Hillary wins does that mean those republicans decided to vote for Hillary because she will be
jillan
Feb 2016
#186
If you had told me 6 mos ago Maddow would be shilling for a third way centrist
RiverLover
Feb 2016
#216
Perhaps job security, notoriety and living inside a bubble does that to you...
MrMickeysMom
Feb 2016
#198