Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pfft. Still peanuts compared to what the Republicans will have in store for her when she wins the BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #1
He just burned through most of his cash. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #5
The Nader-Nurses - a SuperPAC - is spending tons of money on his behalf. Not to mention, BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #8
Conflating a nurses union with Goldman Sachs and hedge fund managers? Really? think Feb 2016 #10
They're a SuperPAC. I constantly read from Bernie supporters that he doesn't have a PAC. Um, yeah, BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #15
The GOP hasn't spent shit attacking Clinton. If they wanted to take out Clinton they have tons of Skwmom Feb 2016 #17
If by that you mean, $5 million isn't "shit", then yeah. Otherwise, they spent $5 million. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #20
And you think Sanders is working with them? That's what matters Armstead Feb 2016 #22
No. But he IS benefiting from it, isn't he? Especially when you consider that they haven't spent a BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #24
The issue is whether someone has a SuperPAC Armstead Feb 2016 #25
I'll take a bunch of nurses over hedge fund millionaires any day Armstead Feb 2016 #21
I'll take a Democrat over a Naderite, anyday. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #26
From the FEC statement: "Donations must be itemized if the people send more than $200." think Feb 2016 #9
So what that tells me is, people have donated but not given that information, right? BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #11
You might want to reread the statement and think about what your saying. think Feb 2016 #13
Okay. Without getting snarky, what am I missing? eom BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #16
The Sanders campaign hasn't itemized some donations yet and that is what the FEC wants think Feb 2016 #19
Okay. Thanks for the explanation - and for not being snarky. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #23
Thank you for your kind reply. think Feb 2016 #27
Sad how few people believe in her to give. Kittycat Feb 2016 #2
we're coming for you Maddi: we have your address, Maddi MisterP Feb 2016 #28
i'm shocked...shocked, i tell you...like Claude Rains shocked... islandmkl Feb 2016 #3
Boy those Hedge fund UglyGreed Feb 2016 #4
Maybe they like being told to "cut it out" by an older woman n/t BuelahWitch Feb 2016 #32
Most of JEB!'s superpac money will be moved to Hillary. Doctor_J Feb 2016 #6
EXCELLENT! MohRokTah Feb 2016 #7
Then it's the people who lose dreamnightwind Feb 2016 #29
You enter the election with the law as it stands. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #31
Disgree dreamnightwind Feb 2016 #33
She's not corrupted though. They don't expect anything from her. JRLeft Feb 2016 #12
Awesome! She'll need those connections in the general to bring down the GOP wyldwolf Feb 2016 #14
The hedge fund money is a pay down for getting rid of the deferred tax bill coming due in 2017. Skwmom Feb 2016 #18
Excellent! CorkySt.Clair Feb 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton super PAC...»Reply #14