Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: THE VERMONT SOCIALIST’S TROUBLING HISTORY OF CAMPAIGN SHENANIGANS [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)70. My response is that I trust brock with truthiness, not truth
just as I trust O'Keefe with truthiness not truth. He is a smear merchant. In fact BOTH ARE
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
THE VERMONT SOCIALIST’S TROUBLING HISTORY OF CAMPAIGN SHENANIGANS [View all]
fun n serious
Feb 2016
OP
I'm starting to like Clinton's smear attacks. They are just pissing half the Democrats off. (nt)
w4rma
Feb 2016
#2
I know it will. You do the same. Take a GOOD look at the GDP forum with a bi-partisan set of eyes
fun n serious
Feb 2016
#76
Dont forget to add associating his campaign NEEDLESSLY with some one who called Obama "n-word-izzed"
uponit7771
Feb 2016
#4
These things are said by Bernie supports day in and day out about Clinton camp.
fun n serious
Feb 2016
#22
OMG! THAT'S AWFUL! Call Goldman Sachs. We need more money to fight this corruption!
Armstead
Feb 2016
#26
One of the profs of University of Nevada LV said the kids were wearing their own hair like Bernie's.
merrily
Feb 2016
#40
I'm just surprised Brock left that "scandal" off his list. Bernie used to have a lot of hair:
beam me up scottie
Feb 2016
#44
When they use the slur about his "illegitimate child", show them that pic.
beam me up scottie
Feb 2016
#67
Even if true, it's chicken poop compared to the stuff pulled by Hillary, her PAC, her surrogates,
merrily
Feb 2016
#29
(A) You didn't understand my post. (B) You need not explain what you're trying to do.
merrily
Feb 2016
#43
Yes, which means it is biased and therefore worseless as a source of information.
JDPriestly
Feb 2016
#64