Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
47. Your confidence is misplaced.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 02:10 PM
Feb 2016

The Sarandon recording proved that the moderator--cheered by Sanders supporters--violated federal election law by not providing translation. Voters were disenfranchised by that English Only order.

I think Dolores Huerta is winning the popularity contest out in the real world.

And I'm With HER, too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Hypocrisy of Susan Sarandon [View all] lunamagica Feb 2016 OP
This is only one of the reasons I take what she says with a grain of salt. leftofcool Feb 2016 #1
I have to watch my salt intake ... so it's probably best for me to just ignore her completely. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #17
Today is mercuryblues Feb 2016 #119
Welll ... maybe just one ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #121
Don't put it mercuryblues Feb 2016 #122
Mmmm.... biscuits! NurseJackie Feb 2016 #129
LOL. n/t mercuryblues Feb 2016 #130
Here's Demi Lovato shilling for Loreal Paris--Lovato campaigned for Clinton in Iowa CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #94
I'm sorry, you are in an irony-free zone, please move along :) / FlatBaroque Feb 2016 #111
Since when do Sanders supporters HATE the 1%? Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #2
Mainly because Bernie has used the 1% meme as a cudgel to redstateblues Feb 2016 #4
Not really. If you actually listen to him he says he wants them to pay their fair share Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #12
Baloney. TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #64
so the latest hillary meme is to DEFEND the 1%? WOW! roguevalley Feb 2016 #67
I know, I would expect this from republicans, but democrats? n/t TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #70
I think that quite a few enjoy vast wealth. frylock Feb 2016 #74
If you go by the rhetoric of certain posters, the list of those JimDandy Feb 2016 #115
Those poor poor successful people? How will they go on Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #100
+1 btrflykng9 Feb 2016 #42
Because It's Simple.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #71
... Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #139
Is that supposed to override my hatred for war and fracking and the Third Way and the TPP? djean111 Feb 2016 #3
+1 n/t ejbr Feb 2016 #109
We don't hate the wealthy! Sick of that lying meme. RiverLover Feb 2016 #5
So we can hold all 1%ers to that standard? Even the ones that support Hillary? Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #6
but..but... workinclasszero Feb 2016 #7
FYI Armstead Feb 2016 #36
Ai-yi-yi . . . I opening that link and . . . Petrushka Feb 2016 #116
Bwahahaha! There goes that meme! n/t ebayfool Feb 2016 #132
"That's all I got" Phlem Feb 2016 #86
Sigh. You start with a dumb false claim cali Feb 2016 #8
OK, what about the rest? The part after my "dumb claim"? lunamagica Feb 2016 #21
Interesting Kall Feb 2016 #31
I was just quoting you. But keep deflecting lunamagica Feb 2016 #38
No, you weren't Kall Feb 2016 #46
I'm addressing that right now Trajan Feb 2016 #48
Isn't this the point where I make some snide under the bus comment? Goblinmonger Feb 2016 #9
Only thing is cannabis_flower Feb 2016 #10
Oh and this: cannabis_flower Feb 2016 #142
You really don't understand what Bernie is fighting. aikoaiko Feb 2016 #11
This thread is about SS and L'oreal. Why iis everyone ignoring that? lunamagica Feb 2016 #39
Maybe because your thread title is: The Hypocrisy of Susan Sarandon aikoaiko Feb 2016 #56
See my responses below -- Clinton likes L'Oriel just fine Armstead Feb 2016 #73
This is part of the destroy all threats strategy Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #13
So, a 1%er is harassing a civil rights hero and being cheered for doing so. Nice. nt. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #14
But wait, there's more--she had NO BUSINESS BEING THERE!!! MADem Feb 2016 #18
Trying so hard melman Feb 2016 #41
Your confidence is misplaced. MADem Feb 2016 #47
An election held by a private corporation such as the Democratic Party is NOT JimDandy Feb 2016 #127
The Democratic Party is a political party, not a corporation. MADem Feb 2016 #146
What state is Huerta a resident of? Chakab Feb 2016 #99
So, a 1%er is harassing a civil rights hero and being cheered for doing so workinclasszero Feb 2016 #22
At what point in that conversation did Ms. Huerta attempt to break free? frylock Feb 2016 #80
Haven't you heard? Civil rights leaders are fragile eggs. Must be treated with kid gloves. Hiraeth Feb 2016 #91
How strange to call a civil discussion of issues harassment? aikoaiko Feb 2016 #57
I was wondering the same thing eom passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #128
Except neither of that ever happened. frylock Feb 2016 #76
She claims that she can't support Clinton because of her IWR vote. MADem Feb 2016 #15
Well good thing she isn't running for President. Wow such scrutiny of a surrogate! Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #19
Dolores Huerta certainly got the once-over, didn't she? As did John Lewis, Jim Clyburn, et al. MADem Feb 2016 #27
Ms. Huetra got the once over for her uhhhh misrepresentation of factual events. frylock Feb 2016 #81
Church ain't out on that yet, much as some want to close the book. MADem Feb 2016 #150
Polite. And accurate. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #20
Thanks! Funny everyone is stuck on the first sentence lunamagica Feb 2016 #24
Ha! Really you're surprised? Phlem Feb 2016 #92
The hypocritical Clinton Foundation likes L’Oréal too Armstead Feb 2016 #16
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #32
Make this an OP Lordquinton Feb 2016 #77
No limit to the slime factory from you people. CBGLuthier Feb 2016 #23
Are you saying the facts in the article are lies? lunamagica Feb 2016 #25
The Clinton Foundation likes them Armstead Feb 2016 #34
This thread is not about the Clintons. Stop deflecting, please. lunamagica Feb 2016 #35
Sauce for the goose..... Armstead Feb 2016 #37
Oh, no, luna. All of it is about the Clintons mikehiggins Feb 2016 #75
Do you know WHY they did this? jmowreader Feb 2016 #114
No, it's about Loreal Lordquinton Feb 2016 #79
This thread is about hypocrisy. frylock Feb 2016 #84
Susan Sarandon is not a hypocrite. mmonk Feb 2016 #26
Please, then, explain how she could overlook Edwards' IWR vote, but said that she couldn't MADem Feb 2016 #62
Touché Beacool Feb 2016 #113
Susan lives in a glass house yet throws stones. ha ha riversedge Feb 2016 #28
I never cared for her. NaturalHigh Feb 2016 #29
Finally ... Trajan Feb 2016 #49
wait wait EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #30
+10,000 nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #33
Nice deflection lunamagica Feb 2016 #40
It's not a deflection EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #43
It's not hypocrisy when Clinton does it. Dr. Strange Feb 2016 #59
Here's a deflection mikehiggins Feb 2016 #131
Oh wait -- Hillary likes L'Oreil too Armstead Feb 2016 #44
Someone who used to work for Hillary works for L'Oreal dlwickham Feb 2016 #61
As relevant as Susan Sarandon Armstead Feb 2016 #65
She actively campaigns for sanders dlwickham Feb 2016 #104
Let me say this slowly....I.....don't....care Armstead Feb 2016 #105
Why should you care dlwickham Feb 2016 #106
Yeah a real phony UglyGreed Feb 2016 #45
Lame. It's not the rich being rich. It's the rich not sharing. nt valerief Feb 2016 #50
I was very disappointed to learn she was hectoring octogenarian civil rights leaders. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #51
Yes, that was a low point in her career as a public person ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #55
I prefer to remember her as Sister Helen. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #93
she was hectoring octogenarian civil rights leaders. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #69
No, the information was BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #83
you are treading on very thin ice. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #151
Yes, Ms. Huerta must be approached upon bended knee. frylock Feb 2016 #87
Hey! No hatin' on Susan! KamaAina Feb 2016 #52
Susan Sarandon isn't running for the office of the Presidency. notadmblnd Feb 2016 #53
Yes, nobody should abuse and exploit children Trajan Feb 2016 #54
Go Susan! Fearless Feb 2016 #58
But Susan is worth it dlwickham Feb 2016 #60
yeah well mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #63
More artful smear Wibly Feb 2016 #66
She's one of the 1% the Sander's supporters say they despise. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #68
Another GOTCHA!fail frylock Feb 2016 #72
How so? Isn't SS receiving millions from L'oreal? Doesn't L'oreal expliots children and abuses lunamagica Feb 2016 #140
Not to mention L'Oreal tests on animals. catbyte Feb 2016 #78
You might want to mention that to Hillary Clinton supporter Demi Lovato-- CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #95
I'm NOT a Bernie supporter. I'm NOT a Hillary supporter. I think it's despicable of all of them. catbyte Feb 2016 #97
No, they don't passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #133
I wish Sarandon had said to Huerta, MisterP Feb 2016 #82
Susan has a permanent pass with me Tab Feb 2016 #85
If you disagree with Hillary Clinton--here comes the Rovian hit machine! CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #88
The Stepford voters. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #89
All she does? She said we vote with our vaginas. Don't you find that terribly insulting? lunamagica Feb 2016 #141
Sarandon should still be in hiding for her part in "Stolen Election 2000". oasis Feb 2016 #90
more propaganda to encourage UglyGreed Feb 2016 #120
Sarandon has no business calling herself a Democrat, and therefore oasis Feb 2016 #134
Is she under the bus now? I know that seems to be the Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #96
Pretty soon, Hillary Clinton supporter Demi Lovato will be under the bus too--She shills for L'Oreal CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #102
All I know is that I look forward to a few days and about Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #103
I'm sure they'll be attacking her like wildfire! Any minute now!! (nt) CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #108
Still waiting. This is confusing. It almost feels like Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #117
WTF greiner3 Feb 2016 #98
Don't forget the Billionaires! PeterGM Feb 2016 #101
More politics of destruction. blackspade Feb 2016 #107
your people don't get to harrass our leaders with impunity bigtree Feb 2016 #112
. melman Feb 2016 #118
Harass in what way? blackspade Feb 2016 #124
Is this a religous thing ? TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #136
WHY didn't you know that, Sarandon?! bigtree Feb 2016 #110
Oh noes, they are throwing her under the bus passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #123
The entire episode is sickening. yardwork Feb 2016 #125
REC! bravenak Feb 2016 #126
Hmmm...The more you know. passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #135
Under the bus, Sarandon! Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #137
Don't miss out on your own hypocrisy: Live and Learn Feb 2016 #138
My own Hypocisy? I've never given a holier-than-thou lectures against Wall St. lunamagica Feb 2016 #144
I know. Neither has Hillary! Where are those transcripts? nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #145
Not good enough, PSU AESE! SMC22307 Feb 2016 #143
You mean the same Susan Sarandan who campaigned for Ralph Nader??? Jitter65 Feb 2016 #147
That's the one! lunamagica Feb 2016 #148
I really dislike her. What put me over the edge BreakfastClub Feb 2016 #149
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Hypocrisy of Susan Sa...»Reply #47