Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

renate

(13,776 posts)
115. great post! all very well said!
Wed Oct 10, 2012, 11:57 PM
Oct 2012

I especially like the first line of your second paragraph--I think you're absolutely right about the money, the anger, the lack of intellect, and the shameless disregard for the democratic process. If every voter was a deep thinker and every Republican in charge of counting the votes had morals, we wouldn't have a care in the world.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Shouldn't they have remained stable? TroyD Oct 2012 #1
That's what I was wondering... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #5
No. Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #12
Which, of course, we were all satisfied with in August... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #44
I was Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #61
No, the longer that Romney's boost persists the more relevant it becomes to picking geek tragedy Oct 2012 #14
"Game changer" Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #18
Remains to be seen. nt geek tragedy Oct 2012 #84
Lol. You wish. morningfog Oct 2012 #80
I'd rather be talking about how we're going to take the House. geek tragedy Oct 2012 #85
Right. One debate was responsible for us not taking the House. morningfog Oct 2012 #96
No game changer. ywcachieve Oct 2012 #88
The Obama campaign begs to differ with you. nt geek tragedy Oct 2012 #89
Show me proof, that they beg to differ with me. ywcachieve Oct 2012 #91
Read the national journal article--the debate wiped out the 47% video and the geek tragedy Oct 2012 #106
alright so he did not have the night we wanted. we can't relive the past my friend. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #108
That's not proof that the Pres. Obama campaign agree with all the negativity. ywcachieve Oct 2012 #123
Bullshit. You are just making shit up now. morningfog Oct 2012 #97
That statement right there is a "game changer." Indpndnt Oct 2012 #92
That sucks! hrmjustin Oct 2012 #2
Devastating! Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #3
you people are in for a rude awakening blueknight Oct 2012 #6
I don't need anything... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #11
It's not devistating, it's his model catching up to reality. fearnobush Oct 2012 #40
Elections almost always tighten in October... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #49
Look, just admit Chicago got played...and go from there. Sekhmets Daughter Oct 2012 #78
great post! all very well said! renate Oct 2012 #115
If one debate can change it that much, two more can do the same... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #45
The sky is falling, the sky is falling, the sky is falling... Are you afraid of your own shadow too? RBInMaine Oct 2012 #67
LOL... No fear with me. ywcachieve Oct 2012 #90
"You People"? Generic Brad Oct 2012 #69
Romney's uptick is all ready eroding... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #109
We'd better hope and pray... BlueDemKev Oct 2012 #117
I hope you are right. Voting has started here in Fl. nt Mojorabbit Oct 2012 #118
Let's not make light of this TroyD Oct 2012 #7
I'll make light of it all I want... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #8
It's not a 2 point drop TroyD Oct 2012 #24
It's a two-point drop... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #31
That's how they measure it! alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #52
We're measuring the total drop from Pre-Debate to Today TroyD Oct 2012 #39
Good for you. I don't. Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #50
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #9
You hit it. That is still a great number, it's just not as overwhelming as before. dkf Oct 2012 #83
I don't know why he does not just put helpisontheway Oct 2012 #4
The model is the model. Silver's human analysis is separate. geek tragedy Oct 2012 #10
You're stating opinion as fact. Stop doing that. Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #13
That's straight out of Silver's model. The longer a trend persists, the lower the geek tragedy Oct 2012 #16
No it doesn't... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #27
What is a concerning-troll? hrmjustin Oct 2012 #53
Great post. ywcachieve Oct 2012 #93
I hate to take Greeks side, but look at the electoral map on the 538 site; ChimpersMcSmirkers Oct 2012 #111
Uh huh. Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #114
Not a week yet. Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #15
Exactly... Drunken Irishman Oct 2012 #19
Gallups seven day tracker is a problem Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #26
Statistically, longer time periods can be useful Godhumor Oct 2012 #35
Also problematic Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #54
But the point of longer time frames is to reduce short term random noise Godhumor Oct 2012 #59
Won't argue. No right answer Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #68
Right, you need a combo of both Godhumor Oct 2012 #74
Tomorrow it's one week. geek tragedy Oct 2012 #28
Unconcerned Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #41
Ahead, but short of 50%. With those undecided not basing their decision on what geek tragedy Oct 2012 #48
Perhaps Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #56
That last statement is REALLY questionable... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #98
Yes and no... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #94
We also heard today that the latest round of swing state internals have returned back to fearnobush Oct 2012 #57
We're in queasy territory. geek tragedy Oct 2012 #82
No candidate had won in recent history from Romney's pre-debate position Mutiny In Heaven Oct 2012 #86
True... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #99
I repudiate anything attributed to an unnamed source at National Journal. n/t grasswire Oct 2012 #66
and the conservative national journal would get the real scoop CitizenPatriot Oct 2012 #103
Plus, his model for convention bounces required more like two weeks... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #38
Nobody really thinks that except you. Chan790 Oct 2012 #120
I think Nate's taken a hit to his credibility over the past week... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #17
Not the way it works, it is a simulation not an opinion Godhumor Oct 2012 #21
I expect a drop to 62-65 percent Floyd_Gondolli Oct 2012 #20
Same. I'll have a post on this later. Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #30
i second your feeling MFM008 Oct 2012 #36
I'm guessing 52-55%, personally... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #95
A bit too low Floyd_Gondolli Oct 2012 #121
This daily plummeting is getting to be kind of a drag. Frumious B Oct 2012 #22
Come on, 85% was unrealistically high Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #23
It's not like it was a prediction of 85% of the VOTE TroyD Oct 2012 #33
I feel so much better tonight... cheriemedium59 Oct 2012 #25
Oh my FREAKING GOD WeekendWarrior Oct 2012 #29
We're Doomed! Doctor Jack Oct 2012 #75
Isn't that down like 15 percentage points from a week ago tonight? budkin Oct 2012 #32
Sorry -18.2% budkin Oct 2012 #37
It didn't. We were never that likely Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #42
i don't think it did. Romney got something from the debate but not as much as some... hrmjustin Oct 2012 #47
I'll take those odds Onlooker Oct 2012 #34
Except that Nate has written... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #43
Not to be overly optimistic or anything, but isn't that still a win? LiberalAndProud Oct 2012 #46
Good point Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #79
That's a fascinating article. fearnobush Oct 2012 #81
Exactly. Still, I'll take Nate's percentages. It's a good bet. LiberalAndProud Oct 2012 #122
Biden needs to give the media something new to talk about Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #51
jesus, you are depending on biden? blueknight Oct 2012 #58
He did a good job in the Palin debate Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #63
Thanks for carrying right wing water ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #76
Not 68%! Doctor Jack Oct 2012 #55
You apparently didn't read above, where a 65% projection of winning essentially means that you're alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #60
You can't get any lower than 65% Doctor Jack Oct 2012 #64
Very obviously - a 65% chance of winning is a 0% chance, while a 35% is a 100% alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #70
Geek Tragedy helpisontheway Oct 2012 #62
Not fair Shivering Jemmy Oct 2012 #73
Oh just stop this INSANITY. Do you need diapers? Quit pissing yourself over this poll shit. RBInMaine Oct 2012 #65
But Romney has been ahead for 3 whole days! Doctor Jack Oct 2012 #72
Slip slidin' away oswaldactedalone Oct 2012 #71
Your attitude sucks. MjolnirTime Oct 2012 #77
Hey, don't shoot the messenger... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #100
Yes, everybody is censoring you alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #104
That's not good. man4allcats Oct 2012 #87
EVERYONE PANIC!!! OBAMA'S ONLY *TWICE* AS LIKELY AS RMONEY TO WIN!!! unblock Oct 2012 #101
Why are American voters so damn wishy-washy? Jamaal510 Oct 2012 #102
... Cali_Democrat Oct 2012 #105
Let's see where we're at in a week before we panic. boxman15 Oct 2012 #107
Nate's commentary is up ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #110
That was guru-licious alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #113
I predict President Obama will rebound nicely by this time next week catbyte Oct 2012 #112
Unbelievable... BlueDemKev Oct 2012 #116
The one major flaw with Nate's analysis..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #119
I don't think he misread Pew. FBaggins Oct 2012 #124
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hold on to your hats...53...»Reply #115