2016 Postmortem

Uncle Joe

(65,199 posts)

33. Kicked and recommended.

Reply to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:29 PM

Feb 2016

Thanks for the thread, EdwardBernays.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

118 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Potentially serious Hillary Email news [View all] EdwardBernays Feb 2016 OP

sounds serious to me. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #1

Yep - particularly in light of the email asking staff to remove a classified header... FBaggins Feb 2016 #11

jus' the tip of the iceberg (darned autosave! darned drive-wipe!) iAZZZo Feb 2016 #29

Where did this come from passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #45

Emails released by the State Department nt Jarqui Feb 2016 #58

wall street journal has a searchable database of hillary's emails iAZZZo Feb 2016 #63

Thanks...this is pretty incriminating passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #68

you're welcome (n/t) iAZZZo Feb 2016 #117

Hillary, we need to talk about your TPS reports... nt Not Sure Feb 2016 #73

+1 Kittycat Feb 2016 #77

+2 NWCorona Feb 2016 #113

Great find...this is the document I've read about for months Oilwellian Feb 2016 #88

That is damning. n/t Loudestlib Feb 2016 #99

Seems like a plausible scenerio. GoneFishin Feb 2016 #50

That's a dodge answer allowing an exit. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #75

In general, the word "classified" means "categorized" (put into a designated class) thesquanderer Feb 2016 #97

She knew the rules 840high Feb 2016 #78

You're a Bernie supporter so of course it would. Chicago1980 Feb 2016 #43

Are you a Hi11ary supporter? chervilant Feb 2016 #51

not everything is political. sometimes stuff is just wrong. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #55

Our enemies read our secrets RobertEarl Feb 2016 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Feb 2016 #3

Apologies EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #4

I didn't see the other posts Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #10

You"re confusing this with three other Investigations and court cases targeting herm leveymg Feb 2016 #7

This is a very large drop nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #9

When discovery is granted in a suit against a candidate for President it's likr seeing the dam break leveymg Feb 2016 #13

Ultimately she will never be POTUS nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #16

Don't underestimate her hubris. She'll drag the whole Party down with her rather than concede leveymg Feb 2016 #21

Pathological Liars go all the way Politicalboi Feb 2016 #28

I do not underestimate it either nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #30

That is what I am getting from the performance so far as well TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #42

Will we ever know what happened during that meeting between CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #32

The courts, blessed by them, move at their own pace nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #36

If HRC were any other former State Dept employee, she would have been tried, convicted, and serving leveymg Feb 2016 #111

Well there is a specific civil case nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #114

Other than it being a dupe, this is new. morningfog Feb 2016 #22

Ahh, you are wrong. Read the other posts and compare to this one. nt Logical Feb 2016 #24

This has noting to do with Judicial watch a small drop nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #31

did not find any top secret documents that passed through Clinton's server in their full version AlbertCat Feb 2016 #40

Really? I haven't seen the others. nt Duval Feb 2016 #41

The beatings will continue The Redheaded Guy Feb 2016 #48

Clinton is a 'walking scandal' manufactured by the right-wing smear tactics LynneSin Mar 2016 #118

Ah, a Republican leaked it, and someone in the Executive branch tamped down the drama. MADem Feb 2016 #72

Hmmm.... Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #83

Whether it's new or not is not the point. merrily Feb 2016 #106

Clearly. Agschmid Feb 2016 #112

HRC - Duplicity Is As Duplicity Does - Need Any Citizen Say More About Character cantbeserious Feb 2016 #5

this is part 1 of a 75 part series being held back in case she snatches the nomination Vote2016 Feb 2016 #6

The sentences and paragraphs going though unclassed nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #8

Thanks Nadin... I Definitely Do Not Know How This Shit Works... WillyT Feb 2016 #12

Because this exposes procedures and methods to potential nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #14

Got It... Thanks Again. WillyT Feb 2016 #15

Appreciate the explanation! nt Duval Feb 2016 #53

Thanks Nadin, very helpful information. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #84

Right. This is taking information from marked classified documents morningfog Feb 2016 #23

We are not even permitted to send students their grades through email tblue37 Feb 2016 #54

actually, this is not evidence of taking information from classified documents and emailing it MadLinguist Feb 2016 #81

Excellent response. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #89

Did you see reply 11? RunInCircles Feb 2016 #115

There is really no excuse for what azmom Feb 2016 #17

Hubris... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #19

I think you nailed it... tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #85

Her hubris and ego are going to give us president trump. morningfog Feb 2016 #26

Not unless Menika65 Feb 2016 #37

Have you thrown in the towel? Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #91

Been saying it for months...this is some serious stuff... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #18

I have been saying this as well nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #20

Denial and personal bias...and when the criminal referral comes... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #34

I just understand why people don't get it why AlbertCat Feb 2016 #47

Actually Albert I get it why people do not get it nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #59

And Hillary had the gall to say she didn't email anything marked classified. morningfog Feb 2016 #25

That was an allegation until now nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #27

Well, that is a technically true statement. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #92

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #33

If this is true, she needs to drop out Politicalboi Feb 2016 #35

My gut says... Plucketeer Feb 2016 #57

Maybe it's time for Hillary to drop out ... TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #38

Sounds like exactly what you want to send plaintext through random jfern Feb 2016 #39

If they can't make an indictment from emails they will begin investigating her foundation. Todays_Illusion Feb 2016 #44

Blah... Blah... Blah... Chicago1980 Feb 2016 #46

Whatever AlbertCat Feb 2016 #49

Hopefully for her there are no Clinton Foundation "Top Secret" emails. jalan48 Feb 2016 #52

Don't be silly FBaggins Feb 2016 #56

Those were the emails she designated "personal." nt OnyxCollie Feb 2016 #98

sounds potentially serious or like a republican witch hunt. MariaThinks Feb 2016 #60

The intel agencies are not republican nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #62

K&R! nt Duval Feb 2016 #61

More corporate media Republican SHIT. RBInMaine Feb 2016 #64

Lol SheenaR Feb 2016 #66

Keep that head in the sand, RB, and this will all go away! BillZBubb Feb 2016 #74

When the spy guys zentrum Feb 2016 #65

As Bernie himself said salib Feb 2016 #67

Bernie was talking about day to day communications. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #76

Could it be, these are just her problems and... Kittycat Feb 2016 #80

K&R Paka Feb 2016 #69

This is not happy news. Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #93

It sounds like Cassiopeia Feb 2016 #70

Hillary is Joseph K. hay rick Feb 2016 #71

That's not quite accurate Jarqui Feb 2016 #86

Wonder who sent them to her, obviously she didn't. Historic NY Feb 2016 #79

Someone who thought they'd go to a secure govenment server? senz Feb 2016 #82

I working from a government computer can you tell... Historic NY Feb 2016 #87

See post #29 where she advises to have the header stripped and the document sent "nonsecure" Matt_in_STL Feb 2016 #108

The RW has been after Clinton forever. blackspade Feb 2016 #90

Frankly this is hard to believe because of the sheer stupidity of it. Bernblu Feb 2016 #94

Wrong word FBaggins Feb 2016 #95

K & R! DiehardLiberal Feb 2016 #96

Different day.. asuhornets Feb 2016 #100

This is new information EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #101

New? asuhornets Feb 2016 #105

Yes new EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #107

Different day, another "judicial watch" RW post leftofcool Feb 2016 #102

Are all Hillary posts going to start with "Different Day" today? EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #103

It's a Reuter's article. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #104

If there's anything to the e-mail scandal, this would be it. Orsino Feb 2016 #109

This is it EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #110

BECAUSE... grasswire Feb 2016 #116