Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

pa28

(6,145 posts)

7. They'll paint a picture of saying one thing in public and another in private.

Reply to nichomachus (Original post)

Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:29 AM

Feb 2016

Damaging but if she really believes she is going to be the nominee she might as well release them now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York Times: Mrs. Clinton release those transcripts [View all] nichomachus Feb 2016 OP

NY Times "Cut It Out" Politicalboi Feb 2016 #1

K & R! n/t RufusTFirefly Feb 2016 #2

Did the NYT finally buy some journalism chops? merrily Feb 2016 #3

She's breaking down all the barriers... except to her speeches and emails. JudyM Feb 2016 #8

And any issue she'd rather not discuss! merrily Feb 2016 #32

I don't believe that The New York Times CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #9

I share your concerns, CoffeeCat RufusTFirefly Feb 2016 #14

Yep. That would be the way to play it. nt Nyan Feb 2016 #17

Like when photogate blew up in her face Lordquinton Feb 2016 #19

I wouldn't trust anything ultragreen Feb 2016 #24

Believe it or not Depaysement Feb 2016 #27

I see your point... CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #38

My point is that it is a fight Depaysement Feb 2016 #39

My first thought too. (nt) PotatoChip Feb 2016 #31

The NYT has definitely supported Hillary (and undermined Bernie) from Day One. merrily Feb 2016 #36

So... DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #28

Yeah baby. This things got legs! jhart3333 Feb 2016 #4

"Accountable"? "Transparent"? Sorry. Please check back later. RufusTFirefly Feb 2016 #5

Wipe my private server? Like with a cloth? merrily Feb 2016 #33

Sanders supporters - do not hold your breath until she does SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #6

They'll paint a picture of saying one thing in public and another in private. pa28 Feb 2016 #7

What's amazing is that she's been aiming for the White House for years! RufusTFirefly Feb 2016 #11

I don't mind elljay Feb 2016 #18

I believe she has intended to run for President since at least her husban's first Presidential merrily Feb 2016 #34

Good Points elljay Feb 2016 #40

As First Lady, she said she wanted a zone of privacy. Well, there is no zone of privacy merrily Feb 2016 #41

There's no way ultragreen Feb 2016 #25

Yep. Took two years to respond to a subpoena and then two years to respond to an FOIA request. merrily Feb 2016 #37

If a Secretary of State or for that matter any other cabinet head creates Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #10

Good call. Not only set up a private server, but have it wiped, merrily Feb 2016 #35

shouldn't that be Secretary Clinton? greymouse Feb 2016 #12

That's the Times' style nichomachus Feb 2016 #16

Not holding my breath rpannier Feb 2016 #13

"...plays into the hands of those who say she�s not trustworthy and makes her own rules..." Nyan Feb 2016 #15

Kick azmom Feb 2016 #20

We have standing if Goldman-Sachs can tax deduct amt paid for Hillary's "speeches". Arizona Roadrunner Feb 2016 #21

Suddenly the MSM is reporting news, telling truth, asking the right questions.? 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #22

The NY Times. Now I'm convinced the transcripts are part of a planned whitewash. Skwmom Feb 2016 #23

Mrs Clinton: youceyec Feb 2016 #26

They will leak, the question is when. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2016 #29

Kick! n/t RufusTFirefly Feb 2016 #30