Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Would most of America let a bunch of southern states tell them who to vote for? [View all]Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)59. Especially taking a cue from South Carolina.
I've been there more times than I like to remember. I never want to see it again, other than Charleston.
The rest of the state is the cradle of stupidity. And, I've said that for the last 15 years.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Would most of America let a bunch of southern states tell them who to vote for? [View all]
AZ Progressive
Feb 2016
OP
based on delegates count along with assumptions she will win new york and california
JI7
Feb 2016
#1
Hillary won New York and California and Texas and Florida in 2008. Still lost to Obama.
reformist2
Feb 2016
#64
Hmmm... it makes for a discussion of demarcations. I'll see what I get. But I like this, thanks
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Feb 2016
#37
Are those 2014 census data? Which states are included in each of your categories? n/t
JimDandy
Feb 2016
#76
People are individuals and I think most people don't see themselves as a "bloc" first and foremost
MADem
Feb 2016
#40
Hortensis's Dictionary: hyperpartisanship (n) - Not supporting Hillary Clinton. Dealing in facts.
BillZBubb
Feb 2016
#55
Going to be fun after that. Bernie does need a good showing in Massachusetts though.
EndElectoral
Feb 2016
#46
how about limiting to them to 3/5 of a vote - based on what I read last night, I am sure
DrDan
Feb 2016
#21
Some of those states think not. They're Repub states. Have been since Johnson and Civil Rights Leg.
EndElectoral
Feb 2016
#47
No, I'm advocating that Southern States should not get to decide who is the Democratic nominee
AZ Progressive
Feb 2016
#67
I live in a very red county in Wisconsin. We gained some infamy during a state Supreme Court race
PeaceNikki
Feb 2016
#50
No one is telling anyone anything. You vote for whichever candidate you prefer.
Beacool
Feb 2016
#43
You can give up. Why should I give up before I even have a chance to vote.
Todays_Illusion
Feb 2016
#51
The states we won't win are the states that should determine who wins the nomination.
Karmadillo
Feb 2016
#66