Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
46. I have the impression that the investigation is over nothing, but the statement from
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:05 PM
Feb 2016

Snowden if true is giving me second thoughts.

I don't know much or understand much about computers, so I haven't seen this scandal as particularly important.

And, if we all were protected from NSA spying and FBI spying, then Hillary's e-mail servers would also have been protected. If, and I repeat, if, the accusation that the Russians or some other foreign power read her e-mails is true, (and so far we have seen only insinuations and accusations but no facts supporting that claim), then they can read all our e-mails and personal data. We know that some of the government's computerized information has been hacked -- even personal employee information. So the question would be whether Hillary's private e-mail arrangement caused any damage or whether perhaps the damage was called by the government, the NSA itself, which discourages even makes impossible, real privacy on the internet even for government employee records.

If you eat spaghetti, you have to prevent the sauce from getting on your clothes.

If you really want computer privacy, you have to make it impossible to hack computers. Our government has to make up its mind. Which is more important? Being able to put all kinds of people, any person and their computer(s) under surveillance or protecting secrets. Can't have it both ways.

We cracked the codes of the Germans and to some extent the Japanese during WWII. That we knew their strategies was a major reason for our success during that war. And here we are -- generally requiring Americans to use insecure computers.

My source on the breaking of the codes is Ike's Spies if you are interested. I don't think that fact is in dispute.

http://www.amazon.com/Ike%C2%92s-Spies-Eisenhower-Espionage-Establishment/dp/1578062071

I am a Bernie supporter, but I think that Hillary will not be indicted for this any more than Bush and Cheney were indicted for war crimes. And I don't think she should be/

But I don't know all the facts so this is a story to watch.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I was wondering when Ha was going to pop back up Godhumor Feb 2016 #1
I missed HA. wildeyed Feb 2016 #59
K&R... datguy_6 Feb 2016 #2
That Goodman guy has been nothing but right so far. nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #3
Lol vdogg Feb 2016 #5
ROTFL! lunamagica Feb 2016 #26
I can't wait to see his meltdown after this is over. sufrommich Feb 2016 #8
They disappeared the one wildeyed Feb 2016 #60
And Sanders supporters continue to cling vdogg Feb 2016 #4
Say what you will NWCorona Feb 2016 #12
FBI investigations are not a saidsimplesimon Feb 2016 #13
+100 amborin Mar 2016 #64
Sanders fans pushing HA Goodman again. Shameful. riversedge Feb 2016 #6
Starting to really feel for Goodman. What a wreck he is. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #7
You're trying too hard zappaman Feb 2016 #9
That's why Repubs are not talking about this right now, not in the debates. They will wait sabrina 1 Feb 2016 #10
Yep Go Vols Feb 2016 #20
Goodman. LOL... SidDithers Feb 2016 #11
How do you go from slobbering over Rand Paul to Bernie MattP Feb 2016 #14
LOL! lots of "shoot the messenger" here; when you can't defend against the charges, target the medi amborin Feb 2016 #15
I support Bernie but this guys message sucks MattP Feb 2016 #16
Almost none of his articles are pro Bernie its anti Hillary MattP Feb 2016 #17
My position, in a nutshell. deurbano Feb 2016 #34
NSA spying on America -- no problem. Octafish Feb 2016 #18
i think there is real potential for a problem here 0rganism Feb 2016 #19
But remember kids, Codeine Feb 2016 #21
throw the Goldman article out angrychair Feb 2016 #40
Goodman. Predictions that fall so flat might as well be Goodyear. great white snark Feb 2016 #22
And it's not just about the emails 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #23
The appearance of quid pro quo is strong in the SOS-Foundation dealings but I wonder how you could thereismore Feb 2016 #28
All good questions .. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #33
I have the impression that the investigation is over nothing, but the statement from JDPriestly Feb 2016 #46
For the sake of the Party, I hope I'm wrong 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #54
K&R! Omaha Steve Feb 2016 #24
LMAO - knew this was HA Goodman from the thread title MaggieD Feb 2016 #25
It's interesting that in all the replies, there is not one disputing any facts in the investigation revbones Feb 2016 #27
Oh but they were plebeians. I am actually shocked that the investigation is proceeding under thereismore Feb 2016 #31
Watergate Gwhittey Mar 2016 #67
Ditto, Land of Enchantment Feb 2016 #45
He's like Tokyo Rose. LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #29
Does that change any of the facts? revbones Feb 2016 #30
So let's say Hillary wins the Presidency. jalan48 Feb 2016 #32
as soon rtracey Feb 2016 #35
As soon as you mentioned Edward Snowden... Helen Borg Feb 2016 #36
Immunity to facts doesn't change them. revbones Feb 2016 #41
pssssssh rtracey Feb 2016 #44
very patriotic there. Personally I want my country to keep improving revbones Feb 2016 #50
it is rtracey Mar 2016 #65
Unfortunately he didn't really have any option. revbones Mar 2016 #66
Excuse me rtracey Mar 2016 #68
Excellent response. But you should things up before commenting. revbones Mar 2016 #69
Well rtracey Mar 2016 #70
citing Huff Blog as source,,,,,,,thats funny Cryptoad Feb 2016 #37
Doesn't change the facts cited or the links provided in the blog post revbones Feb 2016 #38
huffington post yeah totally Hillary run site PatrynXX Feb 2016 #42
pretty much have given into the position that if Bernie loses we all lose in November. money wins PatrynXX Feb 2016 #39
Lets try these actual federal laws. SusanLarson Feb 2016 #43
Yup nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #51
Unfortunately there are separate set of rules for those in high a position as Hillary is in. liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #47
I'm convinced Goodman is a planned satire of fervent Bernie supporters. DemocraticWing Feb 2016 #48
5. Who gives a flying fuck what that cowardly traitorous shit thinks? Blue_Tires Feb 2016 #49
HA Goodman can always be counted on for a laugh Gothmog Feb 2016 #52
We ignore this at our peril farleftlib Feb 2016 #53
.... rbrnmw Feb 2016 #57
Okeydoke! wildeyed Feb 2016 #62
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #55
HAHAHA Goodman rbrnmw Feb 2016 #56
So, if Russia, China, Iran got into her server...what did they do with the info? Jitter65 Feb 2016 #58
Either Goodman lives in a parallel world or he's starting to get desperate. Beacool Feb 2016 #61
Truth be told, wildeyed Feb 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Huff Post: 2/29: FBI's I...»Reply #46