Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Who'd be more harmful in the White House - a buffoonish loose cannon, or [View all]yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)82. Ok... I am gonna with the... a... mmm... sounds like... maybe... I got nuthin' :)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Who'd be more harmful in the White House - a buffoonish loose cannon, or [View all]
Ron Green
Mar 2016
OP
Bill Clinton got more Republican policies passed than any Republican in recent history. nt
Live and Learn
Mar 2016
#12
Or as Michael Moore said, "Bill Clinton was one of the best Republican Presidents we've ever had."
CrispyQ
Mar 2016
#80
Actually, Trump dislikes bankers since they didn't want to lend to him following his bankruptcies.
Live and Learn
Mar 2016
#11
May I reframe? The question is: Did the liberals sit out the election of Hitler's Nazi party?
hedda_foil
Mar 2016
#16
Perhaps he'd be the tipping point for people to rise up; really start the revolution.
Ron Green
Mar 2016
#17
Are you campaigning for Trump here on a "Heighten the Contradictions" argument?
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2016
#62
Is the result of this exploration that Trump will be preferable to the Democratic nominee?
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2016
#95
The banksters would prefer Bernie on the ballot, because he'll be easy to beat
jmowreader
Mar 2016
#20
It appears unlikely that he'll be on the ballot; so you're saying they'd favor Trump over Clinton?
Ron Green
Mar 2016
#23
They seem to be twisting pretty hard to diminish his chances right now. Even to the point of tearing
Ron Green
Mar 2016
#32
"Hillary, on the other hand, would NOT let those guys run roughshod over the taxpayers"
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2016
#97
Very good questions. I think the bankers prefer the reliably corporate-friendly "progressive".
Betty Karlson
Mar 2016
#35
Looks like we end up with a dead planet and a looted treasury either way.
Cobalt Violet
Mar 2016
#38
The tone will improve...Trump will be talking about bringing back American Manufacturing
RiverLover
Mar 2016
#48
Would you vote for someone you thought was dishonest and/or corrupt to stop Donald Trump?
EdwardBernays
Mar 2016
#54
They also know anti-Hillary moderators routinely let OP's like this stand.
great white snark
Mar 2016
#60
Ok... I am gonna with the... a... mmm... sounds like... maybe... I got nuthin' :)
yourpaljoey
Mar 2016
#82
Which would be more harmful? A tablespoon of arsenic in your coffee or a tablespoon of strychnine?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#79
Hillary Clinton will still win the Democratic nomination and be elected President.
George II
Mar 2016
#94