2016 Postmortem

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

281. As far as I'm concerned it is time for change. Period.

Reply to alfredo (Reply #274)

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:18 PM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

339 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN Exit Poll: Mass: Sanders 52-46 Finally Clinton 50-49 = Election fraud [View all] TheProgressive Mar 2016 OP

They are wrong all the time redstateblues Mar 2016 #1

Exit polls are some of the most reliable NWCorona Mar 2016 #5

Agree, but definitely suspicious. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2016 #219

Exit polls had historically been the barometer of voting accuracy until randr Mar 2016 #65

Since 2000 I've wondered just how accurate vote recording and exit polls are. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #90

I'm glad to hear that because Hillary supporters were telling me when the exit polls sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #115

Of course skepticscott Mar 2016 #165

Read your post back to yourself jsmirman Mar 2016 #171

That's what i just said. I'm confused by Hillary supporters confidence in exit polls now. sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #176

The whole point here is that they are saying that exit polling is imperfect jsmirman Mar 2016 #187

Made sense to me! merrily Mar 2016 #260

show us a link where one of them made those exact points CreekDog Mar 2016 #193

Read this from the numbers men/women at 538 alfredo Mar 2016 #315

I sure am focused as I have been from the beginning, making sure as many people as possible sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #319

Stay focused. If Bernie didn't raise a stink about Bill, then neither should you. alfredo Mar 2016 #323

Excuse me? You think citizens should take their cues from 'leaders' before acting sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #327

Every campaign I've worked for did the same thing about irregularities. alfredo Mar 2016 #329

Wow, so there's 'message discipline' and a 'script'? How sad, this is what Political Operatives sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #332

Talking Points are scripts. Persuasion, not force alfredo Mar 2016 #334

Well, gee, thank you: 'You still have freedom to thin, act, or speak as you wish'. sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #337

So you are just a voter, you are not a campaign worker? alfredo Mar 2016 #338

bill wandering around in the polling places wasn't planned. No it wasn't roguevalley Mar 2016 #140

Billy Ray Joe Bob Clinton roaming around a polling place RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #169

Officials did not see any electioneering. Shaking hands and greeting people isn't electioneering. alfredo Mar 2016 #175

He was in effect RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #178

If there was wrongdoing the election officials would have called it then and there. ` alfredo Mar 2016 #239

Not if the precinct sheriff RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #245

That won't happen. The other officers would report him/her. alfredo Mar 2016 #262

Oh come on. RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #269

As if there would be no cameras there to catch the exchange. Have you ever worked the polls? alfredo Mar 2016 #275

He would have surrogates take care of it RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #278

Everyone on the planet- including Elizabeth Warren has now been accused of being on the take... bettyellen Mar 2016 #268

Or me RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #270

HA, I am glad you have a sense of humor about it! bettyellen Mar 2016 #271

Passions run high, and it hurts bad when your candidate is on the losing end. It's akin to grief. alfredo Mar 2016 #276

It's akin to the kind of foolishness that got us where we are now. Too much interest in politics bettyellen Mar 2016 #282

"The precinct sheriff would order him to quit,.." pangaia Mar 2016 #255

I would, even in my judge position. alfredo Mar 2016 #263

+1000 pangaia Mar 2016 #308

We alwaays start with a gentle reminder of the law, then we kneecap them ;) alfredo Mar 2016 #310

He had a bull horn. That's not for schmoozing. merrily Mar 2016 #253

This is true RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #259

That was used during an event there. alfredo Mar 2016 #265

His very presence is electioneering. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #188

That cuts both ways. Some love him, some hate him. alfredo Mar 2016 #267

In my view, he was within the law as long as he remained 150 feet from the rope around the JDPriestly Mar 2016 #290

It's illegal only if you are engaged in electioneering. Election officials said he wasn't alfredo Mar 2016 #301

A distraction maybe? kristopher Mar 2016 #223

I don't think dirty tricks were needed. Hillary had a built in advantage with name recognition. alfredo Mar 2016 #274

As far as I'm concerned it is time for change. Period. kristopher Mar 2016 #281

�The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.� MLK jr alfredo Mar 2016 #300

He said that shortly before he was assassinated, didn't he? kristopher Mar 2016 #302

Come Nov, that is important. MLK's words and works lived on. The assassin failed. alfredo Mar 2016 #305

No, the assassin didn't fail. kristopher Mar 2016 #322

What I was trying to say, you can kill a person, but not their ideas. alfredo Mar 2016 #328

The civil rights movement has made virtually no progress as envisioned by King. kristopher Mar 2016 #330

This change is massive, and will take several generations. alfredo Mar 2016 #333

No, incremental change is not happening - we are going backwards. kristopher Mar 2016 #335

Thank you for clearing this up. Laser102 Mar 2016 #244

It won't satisfy, or ease the hurt of a loss. alfredo Mar 2016 #306

And the bull horn was to do what? Why was the polling place closed? You can do better than that. merrily Mar 2016 #252

That was from an GOTV event held nearby. Secret Service shut it down while he was in the polls. alfredo Mar 2016 #307

Untrue. merrily Mar 2016 #311

How? alfredo Mar 2016 #312

Read merrily Mar 2016 #321

I didn't specifically say you. I was trying to get you focus on the future, not the past. alfredo Mar 2016 #326

Arrogant much? merrily Mar 2016 #336

Jail? NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #229

How about awarding all the MA UglyGreed Mar 2016 #264

Why the hell would that happen? NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #285

Bill was not campaigning?????? UglyGreed Mar 2016 #309

Hillary is now actually ROVIAN. She should be asked to pledge that he will not do this again. JudyM Mar 2016 #206

He wasn't just wandering around Oilwellian Mar 2016 #210

Yep, the Secret Service always lets ex-presidents wander randomly into crowded places without notice arcane1 Mar 2016 #279

The polling place wasn't crowded. Primaries don't draw big turnout. alfredo Mar 2016 #313

He was speaking to a crowd with a bullhorn n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #314

The crowd was not in the polling place. It was a separate event. alfredo Mar 2016 #316

This is a joke, right? Adrahil Mar 2016 #2

Only with 'electronic voting machines'... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #15

Any time I lose the other side has to be cheating SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #54

Nice try. nt Snotcicles Mar 2016 #143

IOW, ignore the man with the bull horn who shut down a polling place? Good luck with that narrative merrily Mar 2016 #261

I watched the Massachusetts returns as they came in. By 20% Hillary was ahead 22,000 votes. At 100% GoneFishin Mar 2016 #70

odd questionseverything Mar 2016 #109

Where/how did you come up with 23,251 undervotes? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #117

cards cast 147,692 minus total votes 124,441 questionseverything Mar 2016 #121

Thank you for that... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #123

found this too questionseverything Mar 2016 #220

see #277 for correction on the undervote but questionseverything Mar 2016 #292

I saw some of your posts when I got in... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #295

Sounds suspicious to me. sorechasm Mar 2016 #126

You did not include Republican votes ISUGRADIA Mar 2016 #277

i see...plus green and uni...ty for correction questionseverything Mar 2016 #283

I have worked in Dem politics in my state for over 40 years SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #177

Aren't exit polls supposed to be hitting all areas? JackRiddler Mar 2016 #201

MA has a paper trail for all ballots. iandhr Mar 2016 #142

And electronic tabulators to count them... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #148

Well the Sanders campaign isn't requesting one. iandhr Mar 2016 #161

Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #293

Well, yeah NastyRiffraff Mar 2016 #232

Frankly I question the results of any primary being conducted on voting machines, with no paper opt. PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #325

I didn't vote on an electronic voting machine Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #318

Was your vote hand counted or read by a 'tabulator' machine? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #320

Serious question: Do you have any actual evidence for that? kristopher Mar 2016 #130

I suspect nothing I would post would satisfy you. Adrahil Mar 2016 #151

Well... kristopher Mar 2016 #183

I believe I have.... Adrahil Mar 2016 #203

For a very comprehensive analysis kristopher Mar 2016 #208

saw that, see my response. Interesting, but misses important points, IMO. NT Adrahil Mar 2016 #212

Another good article. Adrahil Mar 2016 #160

Funny how Silver never mentions electronic voting machines... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #166

That's because they are irrelevant to discussion of the poll's accuracy. NT Adrahil Mar 2016 #200

And another alfredo Mar 2016 #170

Following the citations... kristopher Mar 2016 #189

Can you explain the discrepancy pointed out in posts 109 and the following posts JDPriestly Mar 2016 #190

No, I can't. kristopher Mar 2016 #303

Oh, FFS zappaman Mar 2016 #3

Bill Clinton is like magnetic north. All the RW talking points focus on him. FSogol Mar 2016 #80

Election fraud is a right wing talking point? kristopher Mar 2016 #145

What fraud occurred? FSogol Mar 2016 #147

Exit polls not= tabulated results equals election fraud. TheProgressive Mar 2016 #150

Can you please show evidence that your claim is true? Adrahil Mar 2016 #153

Ask President Jimmy carter who validates elections all over the world... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #157

That's not evidence. Adrahil Mar 2016 #199

Yes kristopher Mar 2016 #192

That's interesting, however.... Adrahil Mar 2016 #211

You ARE kidding, right? kristopher Mar 2016 #221

Are you arguing that since some polls are accurate, all are? Adrahil Mar 2016 #222

The validity of exit polling was proven over decades. kristopher Mar 2016 #224

The poll was off by 4%.... Adrahil Mar 2016 #225

What happened to the 20K votes in Boston? kristopher Mar 2016 #237

The way to the truth is to audit the paper ballots. AmBlue Mar 2016 #243

Massachusetts recount procedures AmBlue Mar 2016 #246

Is there somewhere in the state's literature that explains what the entries are measuring? kristopher Mar 2016 #248

Not sure i understand your question. AmBlue Mar 2016 #250

I'm referring to the original tabulation page entries. kristopher Mar 2016 #251

Ballots are simply a vehicle for recording votes. AmBlue Mar 2016 #256

It's ok to say you don't know. kristopher Mar 2016 #258

So, Bill Clinton didn't tabulate the exit polls correctly? FSogol Mar 2016 #159

like political catsup watered down at that weak and over used azurnoir Mar 2016 #149

LOL...exit polls have been wrong ever since I started following politics. NaturalHigh Mar 2016 #4

Was that at the start of when voting machines were put in service? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #21

LOL...do you think I'm Methusala? NaturalHigh Mar 2016 #61

Fairfax County used electro/mechanical voting machines in the 1970s. FSogol Mar 2016 #162

A am curious as to when you started following politics randr Mar 2016 #69

I voted for the first time when I was 22. 1992 - Bush v Clinton v Perot. NaturalHigh Mar 2016 #73

I have been politically aware since the last election of Ike randr Mar 2016 #88

This message was self-deleted by its author randr Mar 2016 #92

It's fairly common for exit polls to be incorrect. Codeine Mar 2016 #6

I don't take exit polls seriously. bigwillq Mar 2016 #7

Where are you getting this exit poll 52% to 46%? Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #8

It was on CNN live. They quickly stopped showing exit polls... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #25

It was reported here last night, but no link was provided demwing Mar 2016 #35

Exit Polls liberal from boston Mar 2016 #173

It's possible demwing Mar 2016 #198

Stop it KingFlorez Mar 2016 #9

Exit polls are adjusted to cover the fraud. ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #42

Take off your tinfoil hat KingFlorez Mar 2016 #45

we have a concurrently running thread where Camp Hillary is say a Texas exit poll is truth absolute azurnoir Mar 2016 #155

It is undeniable that exit polls are adjusted to match the recorded vote dreamnightwind Mar 2016 #304

Don't you recognize the obvious logical problem in that statement? kristopher Mar 2016 #196

Let me explain this as best as I can KingFlorez Mar 2016 #230

OK, that makes sense of the earlier statement. kristopher Mar 2016 #236

Lets ask former President Kerry GusBob Mar 2016 #10

The Clintons are disgusting at this point. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #11

Every time I think they can't sink lower, misterhighwasted Mar 2016 #75

That smear again? Debbie overreacted and ended up with egg on her face. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #81

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #111

What smear? They did it. Dont blame that on DWS or anyone else. misterhighwasted Mar 2016 #128

Bernie Sanders liberal from boston Mar 2016 #180

So gracious?? No I believe he wanted the limelight on himself misterhighwasted Mar 2016 #249

After that happened, I started getting money requests from Hillary using my name. Zen Democrat Mar 2016 #127

Lol. and a whole bunch of HRC peeps were suddenly hounded by Team Sanders for donations. misterhighwasted Mar 2016 #129

Yep, I was one of them NastyRiffraff Mar 2016 #238

. JudyM Mar 2016 #204

No, exit polls are only slightly more reliable than entrance polls. kstewart33 Mar 2016 #12

Oh for Heaven's sake leftynyc Mar 2016 #13

No they are usually 100% correct... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #26

Everyone else on this thread is leftynyc Mar 2016 #27

Its called propaganda... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #39

LOL - so now exit polls leftynyc Mar 2016 #48

No, saying that exit polls are unreliable is propaganda... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #49

But they are often leftynyc Mar 2016 #56

Exit polls are how election fraud is uncovered in other countries. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #83

THEN CALL THE COPS leftynyc Mar 2016 #84

No science doesn't tell you any such thing dsc Mar 2016 #195

Unrec. Agschmid Mar 2016 #14

The results were 50 to 49% right? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #30

Yes it was close, I'm not arguing that. Agschmid Mar 2016 #71

It was due to fewer people wildeyed Mar 2016 #273

Come on progressives, u cant be serious. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #16

That statement says you are not progressive. TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #59

Well... we KNOW he broke the law yesterday. The Clintons are DIRTY... I put nothing past them. AzDar Mar 2016 #17

I know, what ever happened with that? Ned_Devine Mar 2016 #34

Nothing. It was so blatant and disgusting and anti-democratic Shows what Bernie is up against... AzDar Mar 2016 #44

What law did "who" break? ?? misterhighwasted Mar 2016 #72

Of course you did. AtheistCrusader Mar 2016 #163

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #233

Let's agree to disagree. AtheistCrusader Mar 2016 #240

? i really don't know which complaint was being referred to. misterhighwasted Mar 2016 #247

Then why hasn't the Sanders campaign said or done anything about it? Are they that ineffective? lunamagica Mar 2016 #18

Shouldn't Hillary supporters be speaking up? Or do you condone cheating? AzDar Mar 2016 #47

Of course there was fraud ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #19

Faith is a wonderful thing but do you have any comradebillyboy Mar 2016 #95

Maybe try figuring out why leftynyc Mar 2016 #20

Polls are more often wrong than right. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #22

Exit polls have a margin of error just like any other poll. This is well within any MOE. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #23

Until Karl Rove and W, exit polls HAD been amazingly accurate. randys1 Mar 2016 #31

They still are. A result within a poll's MoE is a vindication of that poll. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #32

exit poles are historically +-1/2%. How do you figure 'vindication' in this instance? Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #57

Can you find me the MoE for this poll? I assumed +/- 3% if so, the poll is vindicated. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #102

MoE for this exit poll was +/- 5% here is a link... this poll is vindicated stevenleser Mar 2016 #105

Thanks for this info. Wow, +-5%... Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #119

i don't know about the the assertions of the OP... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #24

Oh FFS gcomeau Mar 2016 #28

*notoriously* unreliable? Wrong. They are used to detect election fraud... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #36

You are quite simply, quite spectacularly WRONG leftynyc Mar 2016 #51

I see you have been here since 2002... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #55

I'm quite sure of my facts leftynyc Mar 2016 #58

Not within their MOE they aren't. gcomeau Mar 2016 #53

Mass votes on paper ballots. Agschmid Mar 2016 #74

Do you live in MA? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #76

Yup. Agschmid Mar 2016 #77

Are they hand counted? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #85

No. Agschmid Mar 2016 #87

You should read the recount laws for your state.... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #110

Well either way I'd support a recount. Agschmid Mar 2016 #116

How do you definitively know there wasn't fraud? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #118

We could count the votes one thousand times and you would not be satisfied. Agschmid Mar 2016 #122

I see you have no answer... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #124

... There is no answer required here. Agschmid Mar 2016 #131

exit polls not similar to actual = fraud... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #133

Read this thread... Agschmid Mar 2016 #136

Its like the 'red shift' exit polling vs actual... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #138

Okay... Agschmid Mar 2016 #141

'State polling' is very different than exit polling. TheProgressive Mar 2016 #146

... Agschmid Mar 2016 #152

The fraud is evident that the exit polls not= tabulated results TheProgressive Mar 2016 #154

Someone already did... kracer20 Mar 2016 #132

Thanks. Agschmid Mar 2016 #137

Exit polls are the international 'gold standard' for detecting election fraud 99th_Monkey Mar 2016 #125

Truth - a 52/46 exit poll demwing Mar 2016 #205

Or a screwed up exit poll? Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #29

It's Wrong Of Me . . . DarthDem Mar 2016 #33

... Wow. No, this is factually incorrect Godhumor Mar 2016 #37

What is factually incorrect? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #41

The assertion in the OP Godhumor Mar 2016 #50

To prevent this, they should only use the exit polls to determine a race. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #38

No one is going ever take 'progressives' seriously during REAL election fraud... wyldwolf Mar 2016 #40

Nate Silver addressed this jcgoldie Mar 2016 #43

No, its exactly reversed... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #52

Link? onenote Mar 2016 #68

ok jcgoldie Mar 2016 #120

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #235

LOL! He's been so unbiased throughout, we absolutely should "take him at this word" from *yesterday* merrily Mar 2016 #254

Have you forwarded this information to the appropriate authorities? Freddie Stubbs Mar 2016 #46

Maybe the GOP can hold congressional hearings on it! That will get those dastardly Clintons! nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #62

This message was self-deleted by its author GoneFishin Mar 2016 #60

Do understand the concept of margin of error? kennetha Mar 2016 #63

... BooScout Mar 2016 #64

The amount of denial in here is staggering Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #66

I am only questioning Mass because the exit polls do not match tabulated totals... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #79

... SidDithers Mar 2016 #67

you like statistics... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #78

Exit polls are unreliable...nt SidDithers Mar 2016 #86

less reliable than the advance polls... tk2kewl Mar 2016 #89

A swing that big? leftynyc Mar 2016 #93

it's a question that deserves an answer supported by facts tk2kewl Mar 2016 #96

LOL - neither did you leftynyc Mar 2016 #99

i said it's fishy and i don't have an answer but that one ought to be sought tk2kewl Mar 2016 #104

Fine. I'll explain Godhumor Mar 2016 #103

good explanation, but it makes assumptions tk2kewl Mar 2016 #107

It is how exit polling works Godhumor Mar 2016 #112

See #105 above. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #106

thanks tk2kewl Mar 2016 #113

LOL riversedge Mar 2016 #82

They used to call elections based on exit polls pdsimdars Mar 2016 #91

They still do call races based on exit polls Godhumor Mar 2016 #114

Actually, it wasn't "voting machines" Adrahil Mar 2016 #139

It benefits no one other that those who may want to manipulate randr Mar 2016 #94

Fraudulent elections are what will 'truly destroy our nation'... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #97

We need to work towards paper ballots. That's really the only way I'll trust our system. stillwaiting Mar 2016 #108

Let me get this straight. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #98

The circus in MA might just have been a sideshow to cover the real shenanigans. Skwmom Mar 2016 #100

That's exactly what I think happened. smiley Mar 2016 #242

I only regret that I can't not-vote for her any harder. n/t Jester Messiah Mar 2016 #101

K&R smiley Mar 2016 #134

here ya go questionseverything Mar 2016 #217

Yeah I've see that posted... smiley Mar 2016 #234

kick kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #135

Doing the old flip-flop. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #144

Down ... down ... down goes the DNC and MSNBC ! erlewyne Mar 2016 #156

That must be why it took so long to get the reults from one of the early voting states of the day. Todays_Illusion Mar 2016 #158

K & R! TIME TO PANIC Mar 2016 #164

Just as I predicted Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #167

The margin of victory for HRC is only 1.42% AmBlue Mar 2016 #168

In 2008, the exit polls showed a virtual tie in MA. Then the voting machines gave her a rout. mhatrw Mar 2016 #172

We vote on paper ballots, there is a record of every vote in Mass. Agschmid Mar 2016 #184

That is great. But those paper ballots would have to be audited to ensure mhatrw Mar 2016 #197

I'm not sure but as I said upthread I'm fine with a recount. Agschmid Mar 2016 #207

.... rbrnmw Mar 2016 #174

So, Bernie is too timid or too ignorant to battle "obvious" election fraud? brooklynite Mar 2016 #179

so whats new? Iowa nevada and now massachusetts captainarizona Mar 2016 #181

No Dem2 Mar 2016 #182

Likely some Hillary supporters were ASHAMED to... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #185

Ach! ... Ja! ... Jopin Klobe Mar 2016 #186

The Clintons are very popular in MA. Beacool Mar 2016 #191

You are beginning to sound like a very bad imitation Loki Mar 2016 #194

I don't Alert, but if I did... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #202

Ohio???? Loki Mar 2016 #213

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service.. nc4bo Mar 2016 #214

oh for goodness sake... chillfactor Mar 2016 #209

Sanders lost Boston by 17 points. iandhr Mar 2016 #215

No doubt Mass fell off the back of the truck. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #216

I hope Sanders campaign asks for a recount in Mass. The end result is so close it CALLS for a sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #218

they really need to. Merryland Mar 2016 #227

They won't, It's doubtful Bernie thinks the results are off. Agschmid Mar 2016 #296

You may not have noticed but Bernie has not conceded Iowa and I am certain he is sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #298

Bernie hasn't conceded Iowa? Agschmid Mar 2016 #299

Add Another Element Of Corruption To The List cantbeserious Mar 2016 #226

TIA stellanoir Mar 2016 #228

Didn't that guy get banned from DU? Freddie Stubbs Mar 2016 #339

NASA to Bomb the Moon! NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #231

Got a link for that? TheProgressive Mar 2016 #272

Yes, it was a "famous" DU thread from 2009. NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #284

Well good thing you think election fraud is similar to NASA blowing up the moon... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #286

Good thing no election fraud occurred. NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #287

Like my thread stated.... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #291

Always excuses for Bernie's losses. book_worm Mar 2016 #241

Some very rich folks don't want HRC to win Blue Owl Mar 2016 #257

No, you are wrong wildeyed Mar 2016 #266

So Sanders' supporters are so unsure that Clinton's wobbling around would convince them Hoyt Mar 2016 #280

Kinda doubtful huh? Agschmid Mar 2016 #297

Old Bill causing a distraction xloadiex Mar 2016 #288

I thought about your statement quite a bit today... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #294

Bill WOULD NOT Have Been There Doing What He Did If... ChiciB1 Mar 2016 #289

This time they acted within the law. Change.org should be ashamed for not checking with the SOS. alfredo Mar 2016 #317

At the very least the optics REEK silenttigersong Mar 2016 #324

LMAO! MaggieD Mar 2016 #331