Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
114. No Sanders said the focus on it in debates
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:33 PM
Mar 2016

when we should be discussing policy was BS.

No others in the same position have not had private email servers. And those that mishandled classified information like Petraeus got in serious trouble.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's been mentioned on MJ, I do hope it gets serious legs. Bill Clinton's arrogance was OTT...n/t monmouth4 Mar 2016 #1
If by MJ, you mean Mother Jones, that is impressive! Svafa Mar 2016 #85
I'm sorry, no, Morning Joe...n/t monmouth4 Mar 2016 #87
That makes A LOT more sense. Thanks for clarifying. nt Svafa Mar 2016 #90
I noticed it, too. senz Mar 2016 #124
Complete and utter disgrace to their namesake. Svafa Mar 2016 #125
The rules don't apply to the Clintons apparently Armstead Mar 2016 #2
As long as he didn't campaign from within the actual voting booths..... virtualobserver Mar 2016 #6
Yup. Who knew those voting booths were 150 feet long? (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2016 #18
At least he didn't shove aside a little old lady with a walker Divernan Mar 2016 #36
unfortunately you'd have to get past his Secret Service detail to do that. nt magical thyme Mar 2016 #42
I guess ignorance of the law IS an excuse. (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2016 #17
more like "ignoring the law" since we know that he knew perfectly well what he was doing. nt magical thyme Mar 2016 #43
More evidence of Clinton unsuitability for positions of power. nt senz Mar 2016 #129
ayup. election commission asks him to tone it down; instead he doubles down. nt magical thyme Mar 2016 #135
What better way to celebrate the first presidential election since the SC gutted the VRA? loyalsister Mar 2016 #137
"I don't see how any Democrat can defend that behavior." senz Mar 2016 #138
They need to take it seriously. Just imagine if Sanders had a bullhorn in front of nc4bo Mar 2016 #3
Yep, he stole the whole election. Several thousand Sanders' voters changed to Clinton Hoyt Mar 2016 #4
I would be fined if I walked in with my Bernie t-shirt and sign, Vinca Mar 2016 #5
give him a $20 fine, and move on. Adrahil Mar 2016 #7
I agree...but maybe $200 and a public rebuke Armstead Mar 2016 #15
Yes. He should get a minor fine... and the bad press that comes with it. thesquanderer Mar 2016 #19
A fine and a court order to stay away from all polling places noamnety Mar 2016 #59
He should be subject to the same laws as everyone else if he is found to be in violation AllyCat Mar 2016 #37
Well, when I voted other day, I saw people parking within 20 feet of the door with bumper stickers, Hoyt Mar 2016 #86
Oh for fuck's sake. TM99 Mar 2016 #92
Not one vote was changed to Clinton, maybe some Clinton supporters switched to Sanders after Hoyt Mar 2016 #94
Such a typical response from a Clinton supporter. TM99 Mar 2016 #100
Seems like others in same position have done it, and I suspect a lot of Sanders' supporters would Hoyt Mar 2016 #101
No Sanders said the focus on it in debates TM99 Mar 2016 #114
you. don't. know. that. 0rganism Mar 2016 #130
Exactly, you don't know either. But it darn sure didn't affect the results. Sanders lost, fair and Hoyt Mar 2016 #131
oh, i agree - HRC clearly won, but... 0rganism Mar 2016 #133
Can't help where you park in some places. AllyCat Mar 2016 #97
It's only a big deal among those desperately looking for a way forward. I get that. Hoyt Mar 2016 #99
The desperation was all Bill's. MA was virtually tied senz Mar 2016 #132
People wanting to vote and get on to their home, job, or other event is "desperation" AllyCat Mar 2016 #147
Assuming that happened, probably wouldn't impact results of Clinton winning. Hoyt Mar 2016 #149
Really? You think people hung out for hours just to hear Big Dog while they WAITED to vote? AllyCat Mar 2016 #151
Didn't say it was right, but the whining is a waste because it didn't change the results. Hoyt Mar 2016 #152
Bernie cares if voters were hindered Mira Mar 2016 #62
Disagree... KoKo Mar 2016 #63
I see. So IF Hillary takes the primary me b zola Mar 2016 #79
If it's so silly and meaningless, WHY was he there at all those places causing all that rucus? pdsimdars Mar 2016 #83
If he hadn't been there, you folks would be going, "What's Bill hiding from." Jeeez Hoyt Mar 2016 #96
No but he disregarded voters precious time. Not everyone has hours to vote. nc4bo Mar 2016 #10
What makes this really bad is the hubris of it! Dustlawyer Mar 2016 #31
You're not getting it marions ghost Mar 2016 #13
I've been a poll watcher, Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #141
He had to know marions ghost Mar 2016 #145
I wouldn't be able to stand in line for hours Geronimoe Mar 2016 #41
Exactly his just standing there is enough to change people's votes? treestar Mar 2016 #54
If it makes a 30 minute process turn into a 150 minute process, Lucky Luciano Mar 2016 #65
Can't imagine a Bernie supporter not being willing to wait 150 minutes treestar Mar 2016 #66
Seriously?! People have jobs they need to get to. Lucky Luciano Mar 2016 #69
Hello this was a revolution? treestar Mar 2016 #73
. Lucky Luciano Mar 2016 #75
OK I got mixed up with the last primary treestar Mar 2016 #117
My God. Kall Mar 2016 #78
You sure shock easy. treestar Mar 2016 #118
I can't even... uh Mother Of Four Mar 2016 #93
I got that wrong but my point stands treestar Mar 2016 #119
Okies Mother Of Four Mar 2016 #123
okok we get it...the clintons are above the law questionseverything Mar 2016 #113
is there any direct proof anyone waited? treestar Mar 2016 #121
Some folks rob you with a six gun, some with a fountain pen. FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #72
Why is it... artislife Mar 2016 #105
Sad isn't it artislife monicaangela Mar 2016 #109
Yup, sums them up for me. senz Mar 2016 #140
This too shall fade away fredamae Mar 2016 #8
maybe he was referring to a different lever virtualobserver Mar 2016 #9
Ba dum! PonyUp Mar 2016 #12
Wrong lever, Kronk. nt VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #45
The problem is, he apparently went to 4 polling places, all secured by the Secret Service for hours. TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #11
I keep hearing this too, but have not been able to find a news source that says AllyCat Mar 2016 #38
Salon & Boston Mag cite W. Roxbury and Newton, where he actually entered the polling places magical thyme Mar 2016 #46
The SS should also be held accountable for this. I don't jwirr Mar 2016 #61
it's Massachusetts election law that he violated magical thyme Mar 2016 #71
Why would it make any difference about state law except jwirr Mar 2016 #77
I didn't notice the SS at the front of your title. I was still thinking about Clinton. nt magical thyme Mar 2016 #80
Here is an article from Boston LiberalArkie Mar 2016 #47
The campaign was apparently warned and they kept doing it. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #14
Sanction and Move On Paulie Mar 2016 #16
I didn't see in the story that he told someone to "pull the lever for Hillary" inside a polling Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #20
Because he didn't. But you know it is true because someone said it here. Jitter65 Mar 2016 #21
Video of it on twitter. Interesting BostonCBS local had a video of Bill glad handing inside a poll peacebird Mar 2016 #23
So all evidence of this has been completely scrubbed from the internet? Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #25
No. Just that link from a local CBS station. peacebird Mar 2016 #26
Is this what you are looking for? monicaangela Mar 2016 #32
Nothing is ever really scrubbed once someone captures and puts it back up. AllyCat Mar 2016 #40
My pleasure AllyCat monicaangela Mar 2016 #111
Thanks for this. It makes my head hurt watching this Arazi Mar 2016 #50
I agree Arazi monicaangela Mar 2016 #112
per Boston Globe, he was outside the polling place. However, under Mass election laws magical thyme Mar 2016 #48
HOW MUCH DID THIS ELECTIONEERING COST TAXPAYERS?? grasswire Mar 2016 #139
Here LiberalArkie Mar 2016 #49
By Hook or by Crook madokie Mar 2016 #22
Exactly peacebird Mar 2016 #24
Voting and Counting Procedures for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts states: Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #27
Clearly violated the law. The Sec of State of Mass called the campaign to remind them of rules peacebird Mar 2016 #28
"gently" .............unbelievable bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #34
In 2008 two states lost their right to vote in the primary. jwirr Mar 2016 #67
Because of the schedule, went earlier than the DNC dictated bigbrother05 Mar 2016 #91
Yeah. Just like Hillary will "look into" releasing transcripts. nt cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #29
Just Bill being Bill democrank Mar 2016 #30
nope. He danced right over the edge and into the center. magical thyme Mar 2016 #52
"He's not from here so he may not know" bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #33
Yes because catnhatnh Mar 2016 #102
I'm voting for Bernie Sanders. erlewyne Mar 2016 #35
Unrec ... BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #39
From your article (which is two days old): George II Mar 2016 #44
The Clintons are smart enough to look at the law and know what it is treestar Mar 2016 #51
LOL DesMoinesDem Mar 2016 #55
Yeah. Why would they do anything without checking that out? treestar Mar 2016 #57
OMG, Did You Really Just Say That? Even More... ChiciB1 Mar 2016 #68
if they were too dumb to know not to stand on the other side of the line treestar Mar 2016 #70
YOU SO FUNNY! n/t ChiciB1 Mar 2016 #76
non responsive treestar Mar 2016 #122
"Smart" (sneaky) enough to know just how Svafa Mar 2016 #89
Just Us. Octafish Mar 2016 #53
And standing with a bullhorn near the polling place with all jwirr Mar 2016 #56
i hope so! amborin Mar 2016 #58
SOS says he won't do anything because he likes Clinton. noamnety Mar 2016 #60
Pity there isn't some kind of federally applicable estoppel to prevent him from doing this again. JudyM Mar 2016 #64
Exactly. If there are no consequences for what he did in MA, stranger81 Mar 2016 #95
I think so. JudyM Mar 2016 #98
Work hard and play by the rules. Bill Clinton Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #74
Well, let's see if there's Mass. still maintains that old "rule of law" thing. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #81
All of the Conspiracy Theories.. asuhornets Mar 2016 #82
Just by BEING THERE he is promoting the candidate-- marions ghost Mar 2016 #84
If t-shirts and buttons are off limits loyalsister Mar 2016 #126
I think that's the only conclusion marions ghost Mar 2016 #144
I imagine that Trump's campaign is watching this closely me b zola Mar 2016 #88
It was voter suppression NowSam Mar 2016 #103
Good post. snowy owl Mar 2016 #108
Exactly. It isn't like it was close or anything. NowSam Mar 2016 #110
Looking into it matt819 Mar 2016 #104
Why was he even there? artislife Mar 2016 #106
"He was a good president . . ." so he can break the rules. snowy owl Mar 2016 #107
They gave him a bullhorn to boot so the 150 ft seems kind of irrelevant. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #115
":they gave him a bullhorn" probably because his voice was going... brooklynite Mar 2016 #120
As Clinton walks away smiling, giving the peace sign with one hand and the bird with the other. nt. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #116
Just read here that Bill is the one who advised Trump to run. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #127
I'm so sick of these people getting away with anything they want. I Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #128
New video from a would be voter who was outraged shows Bill INSIDE canvassiing for his sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #134
Story linked is TWO days old, SOS already came out and said NO ISSUE Justice Mar 2016 #136
Doesnt mean it's over marions ghost Mar 2016 #146
Can you point us to Bernie Sanders' statement on this issue? brooklynite Mar 2016 #148
No I can't point you marions ghost Mar 2016 #150
It's a club, and we're NOT in it... ReallyIAmAnOptimist Mar 2016 #142
Nothing will come of this. smiley Mar 2016 #143
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Mass Sec of State is look...»Reply #114