Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Who are these "130 economists" that endorse how Bernie pays for his proposals? [View all]Human101948
(3,457 posts)60. When you start using foul Trumpish language you diminish your standing...
The fact is that anyone who isn't pushing for national health care is carrying water for the right wingers.
There is absolutely no reason that we can't have national health care and spend less than we do now.
Simple logic and the example of other developed countries tell us it is very possible--
US Spends More on Health Care Than Other High-Income Nations But Has Lower Life Expectancy, Worse Health
New Report Finds Americans Have Fewer Doctor and Hospital Visits Than People in Other Nations; Outsized Spending Likely a Result of More Technology, Higher Prices For Care and Prescriptions Drugs
New York, N.Y., October 8, 2015 The U.S. spent more per person on health care than 12 other high-income nations in 2013, while seeing the lowest life expectancy and some of the worst health outcomes among this group, according to a Commonwealth Fund report out today. The analysis shows that in the U.S., which spent an average of $9,086 per person annually, life expectancy was 78.8 years. Switzerland, the second-highest-spending country, spent $6,325 per person and had a life expectancy of 82.9 years. Mortality rates for cancer were among the lowest in the U.S., but rates of chronic conditions, obesity, and infant mortality were higher than those abroad.
Time and again, we see evidence that the amount of money we spend on health care in this country is not gaining us comparable health benefits, said Commonwealth Fund President David Blumenthal, M.D. We have to look at the root causes of this disconnect and invest our health care dollars in ways that will allow us to live longer while enjoying better health and greater productivity.
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/press-releases/2015/oct/us-spends-more-on-health-care-than-other-nations
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Who are these "130 economists" that endorse how Bernie pays for his proposals? [View all]
MaggieD
Mar 2016
OP
Heard of Google? It's an internet thingy where you can go look stuff up. Try it. Learn somthing f
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#73
Well, it sounds like that "these people" are confusing Bernie for Republicans. I'm sure that even
desmiller
Mar 2016
#82
I found this online ... I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for or not.
NurseJackie
Mar 2016
#72
Here is the link to the list. Try google next time before acusing someone of lying.
Vattel
Mar 2016
#24
lol, you are so dishonest that you cant admit that the list to which he referred exists.
Vattel
Mar 2016
#29
It's a list of 134 people that explicitly sign on to a statement that says, among other things,
Vattel
Mar 2016
#42
No, he didn't misspeak. The list of 134 contains both economists and healthcare experts.
Vattel
Mar 2016
#66
...and it's been documented that they don't have an economic analysis that stands up....
Sancho
Mar 2016
#67
No, the OP asks for the economists that have analyzed the data and agree with the plan...
Sancho
Mar 2016
#69
The lie is not that the list exists....the lie is what they say the cost is....
Sancho
Mar 2016
#100
Some people refuse to be budged from a position and never let reality get in the way.
guillaumeb
Mar 2016
#81