Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unc70

(6,501 posts)
44. That really is absurd
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 09:49 AM
Mar 2016

That beats any examples I have. I have had published books (ISBN number available in bookstores) from my company be classified at a level where we could not discuss them. It made it difficult to provide our products and services under those restrictions. We finally resolved that, but we still have layers of security between us and the actual users.

In the old days, we had software subject to strict export controls, but if we printed the source code, exported that, and scanned it back in, it was not controlled and could be exported under an unrestricted general license.

There was a case with a NATO partner where there were strict rules and tariffs if you used 9-track magnetic tape, none if you used DAT tapes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nope GreydeeThos Mar 2016 #1
no stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #2
You should work for the NSA if you're so concerned about protecting government secrets n/t Onlooker Mar 2016 #3
It shows intent. RiverLover Mar 2016 #4
Does it? Recursion Mar 2016 #17
Good Qs. I guess we'll find out if the FBI brings charges. RiverLover Mar 2016 #18
Link please? Tanuki Mar 2016 #5
You can search for it here jfern Mar 2016 #8
Ah, I get it. You would prefer not to show where you found your yellow-highlighted graphic. Tanuki Mar 2016 #19
I right-clicked the pic and I think it's from the wall street journal RiverLover Mar 2016 #21
You're taking issue with he highlight? Lame. morningfog Mar 2016 #39
Lazy much? Or tech challanged? Both? Nt Logical Mar 2016 #40
There's a third option: I am so fed up with material from right wing sources showing Tanuki Mar 2016 #43
It's from the WSJ jfern Mar 2016 #46
That is just a better indexed version of this nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #47
Only in your bubble dreams. riversedge Mar 2016 #6
No. Keep fishing. oasis Mar 2016 #7
Some Sanders supporters are going to be just as sufrommich Mar 2016 #9
I think the email where Hillary tells Chelsea a different story about Benghazi than the WH & State Vote2016 Mar 2016 #10
Why would it? Recursion Mar 2016 #11
It would be a problem for most people unc70 Mar 2016 #15
Would it? Recursion Mar 2016 #16
Implied by attempted use of secure fax unc70 Mar 2016 #22
No. If you're in the classified section you want to use secure systems whenever possible Recursion Mar 2016 #23
This may be nothing unc70 Mar 2016 #36
Agreed, and the extent to which stuff is SBU/NOFORN is absolutely absurd, for that matter. Recursion Mar 2016 #38
That really is absurd unc70 Mar 2016 #44
Yep. And in the Marines, I had interview quotes that I wrote down freehand in a notebook Recursion Mar 2016 #45
I get this kind of junk is Sanders best way forward, but jeeez it's tiring. Hoyt Mar 2016 #12
I'll print it out and put it under my pillow tonight. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #13
.... vdogg Mar 2016 #31
Probably not on its own, ... unc70 Mar 2016 #14
Are we still supposed to believe the "cloth wiping"? Yuugal Mar 2016 #20
Sometimes it's the little essential details that reveal existence of entire enterprises. HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #24
Come on, everyone! Let's all try our darndest! randome Mar 2016 #25
No, sorry. You have it wrong. There is nothing illegal about BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #26
Yeah, because everyone who pleads the 5th then is offered immunity on their testimony RiverLover Mar 2016 #29
So why is the FBI investigating? demwing Mar 2016 #42
yes, that's the smoking gun. Merryland Mar 2016 #27
No. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #28
She's been very careful to say there was nothing "marked" classified, so I'ld say this shows intent peacebird Mar 2016 #30
The original question was, "How many drinks has John Boehner had this morning?" randome Mar 2016 #32
Nope, she already talked about it... timlot Mar 2016 #33
"The State Department release does not make clear what the contents of the email were or whether the RiverLover Mar 2016 #34
SHARK JUMP!!!!!!!! Darb Mar 2016 #35
Unlikely (nt) bigwillq Mar 2016 #37
Nothing is going to end her career except retirement. N/t gollygee Mar 2016 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is this the email that en...»Reply #44