Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #1
Superdelagates should not be counted at this time. To do so is very misleading Autumn Mar 2016 #2
I'm not counting superdelegates at all. Chichiri Mar 2016 #3
Just a PSA, the horsehit media is counting them. Autumn Mar 2016 #9
I'm aware of that. nt Chichiri Mar 2016 #12
Thanks so much for helping me understand! Last count Hortensis Mar 2016 #52
How did Bernie tie in NH if you don't count super delegates? n/t A Simple Game Mar 2016 #27
Bernie's target was 15, Hillary's was 9. Chichiri Mar 2016 #38
WRONG!!!! marew Mar 2016 #53
15 and 9 does not include the superdelegates at all. Chichiri Mar 2016 #54
People are not demographic robots AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #4
The networks called 2008 for Obama before a single West Coast result was in. Chichiri Mar 2016 #11
It's not the chattering classes. It's political and social scientists explaining and predicting... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #17
K&R DemonGoddess Mar 2016 #5
Great OP Gothmog Mar 2016 #6
This post *doesn't* include superdelegates. Kang Colby Mar 2016 #7
with all due respect ellennelle Mar 2016 #36
Except that "Super"delegates can change ... Jopin Klobe Mar 2016 #39
I read something similar recently, but I didn't bookmark it. Beacool Mar 2016 #8
K&R! Thanks for explaining! Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #10
K&R fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #13
Interesting. But I'm most interested in Mississippi and Louisiana! --- Will Bernie be able ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #14
Just from looking at the probability curve . . . Chichiri Mar 2016 #19
K & R radical noodle Mar 2016 #15
K&R Treant Mar 2016 #16
... except that Sanders's supporters set his targets at zero and declare every state a victory. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #18
Your picture of h is exactly my face reading this bs. nt artislife Mar 2016 #20
K&R! stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #21
K&R ismnotwasm Mar 2016 #22
Stop confusing people with facts dlwickham Mar 2016 #23
K&R Alfresco Mar 2016 #24
they're called "unfaithful delegates" for a reason MisterP Mar 2016 #25
k&r Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #26
your assessment of mn is incorrect because Bernie took every district evenly even the minority ones azurnoir Mar 2016 #28
There are no minority districts here. Chichiri Mar 2016 #37
complete bull puckey look at the precincts themselves Hillary snubbed the Black voters in MN azurnoir Mar 2016 #48
You mentioned Patrick Henry High School, in north Minneapolis. Chichiri Mar 2016 #50
I live in St Paul and spent many years living in North Mpls a block off of Plymouth Ave azurnoir Mar 2016 #58
Just the stats, man. Just the stats. nt Chichiri Mar 2016 #59
No stats reality azurnoir Mar 2016 #60
I . . . what? nt Chichiri Mar 2016 #61
It all depends on how he can compensate for those targets by doing better in states later on. Tiggeroshii Mar 2016 #29
Response kristopher Mar 2016 #30
The numbers are from FiveThirtyEight. Chichiri Mar 2016 #32
"nil"? I remember that same word being used when Bernie was at 4%. kristopher Mar 2016 #40
The last time Bernie was at 4% was April 21 of last year. Chichiri Mar 2016 #47
I caucused for Hillary in MN BainsBane Mar 2016 #31
So did I Chichiri Mar 2016 #33
Yes, and the MN math is what it is too. BainsBane Mar 2016 #34
Counting ALL MN delegates so far... yallerdawg Mar 2016 #35
Way to move those goal posts. PoliticalMalcontent Mar 2016 #41
Exactly. Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #42
Math is what it is. nt Chichiri Mar 2016 #45
Math based on statistics. Hatchling Mar 2016 #49
Actually, that phrase first appeared in a British paper in 1891... Chichiri Mar 2016 #51
Absolutely. Hatchling Mar 2016 #57
K&R! Stuckinthebush Mar 2016 #43
k&r DesertRat Mar 2016 #44
Kicking kydo Mar 2016 #46
Good post... SidDithers Mar 2016 #55
K&R fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #56
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What do you mean, Hillary...»Reply #44