2016 Postmortem

MFM008

(20,042 posts)

152. senator Sanders and I agree

Reply to leveymg (Original post)

Mon Mar 7, 2016, 11:49 PM

Mar 2016

Neither of us give a crap about her emails.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

185 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WaPo: Clinton, on her private server, wrote 104 emails the government says are classified [View all] leveymg Mar 2016 OP

DOJ Exonerates Clinton's Handling Of Email. stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #1

Link? Or just making stuff up? leveymg Mar 2016 #2

look it up. stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #4

Thank you for kicking my thread again. leveymg Mar 2016 #11

The one who does not back up UglyGreed Mar 2016 #169

So just making stuff up? krawhitham Mar 2016 #18

you can use Bing just like i did. stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #19

Then post it. tazkcmo Mar 2016 #31

i am not your slave look it up, stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #33

lol tazkcmo Mar 2016 #38

I'm not sure how this one madokie Mar 2016 #126

Sounds like you have no evidence... Human101948 Mar 2016 #40

There's a gaggle of them erroneously spreading that the DOJ exonerated HRC. They're being silly. CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #65

Sounds like you have been using Bong Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #70

Sigh... Liberal Jesus Freak Mar 2016 #72

How do you know did you look it up? stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #74

I knew what you were refering to and that was from last September. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #97

... AzDar Mar 2016 #174

Was that the same "Bing" that projected that Bernie would only win VT. on supper Tuesday? awake Mar 2016 #114

Why are we dems doing repug dirty work by continuing to broadcast this non-scandal? brush Mar 2016 #129

I want the truth - you should, too. 840high Mar 2016 #136

Benghazi, Whitewater, Vince Foster and on and on . . . brush Mar 2016 #162

We are already Gwhittey Mar 2016 #182

why do you lie to protect Hillary? Perogie Mar 2016 #43

They lie to themselves. Then they lie to everyone else. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #55

No, the DOJ did not exonerate Clinton CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #64

The FBI has not yet. Nor has the FBI made its recommendations. morningfog Mar 2016 #90

LOL, the typical Hillary supporter! No facts, just opinion! Logical Mar 2016 #120

How do you know did you look it up? stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #121

Real posters provide a link. Logical Mar 2016 #123

well be real and google it. stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #124

LOL, nice try. We get it. You are making shit up. nt Logical Mar 2016 #127

Geebus! Only have to look at the thread YOU posted on in the Hillary Ward to see it! ebayfool Mar 2016 #128

This post was alerted Blus4u Mar 2016 #132

Bwahaha! Figured it would be - yay, jury system! Somebody doesn't get to push the button ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #134

No problem Blus4u Mar 2016 #135

Whenever Hillary is accused of anything, she just tells whatever lies ladjf Mar 2016 #3

So do some of her supporters on this thread. nt leveymg Mar 2016 #8

Hillary and her supporters are basically the same public ladjf Mar 2016 #13

yep 840high Mar 2016 #137

Its still a matter whether she knowingly & willfully sent classified emails via her private server. DCBob Mar 2016 #5

Sorry - The felony statute, 18 USC Secs. 793 (e) and (f) do not require intention to cause harm. leveymg Mar 2016 #6

Nonsense. DCBob Mar 2016 #7

None of those thousands set up their own unsecure email system and required staff to use it. leveymg Mar 2016 #10

Dont worry this will all soon be over. DCBob Mar 2016 #14

Right. It's looking more like she's going to actually be indicted. leveymg Mar 2016 #16

You can keep praying for that along with the GOP but.. DCBob Mar 2016 #17

Actually, I personally feel this is ruinous to the Democratic Party, and wish I were wrong. leveymg Mar 2016 #21

Be patient.. this will soon be all over and then you wont have to worry about it anymore. DCBob Mar 2016 #22

Did James Comey tell you that? nt leveymg Mar 2016 #27

I don't have a crystal ball so I won't say what will happen NWCorona Mar 2016 #44

Whether or not she is indicted, she will NOT "come out of this clean". panader0 Mar 2016 #62

Please name those "thousands" of federal workers. Impedimentus Mar 2016 #29

An informed person could draw the conclusion that the clearances are a joke... Human101948 Mar 2016 #45

Not to mention the fact that the existence of a CIA drone program is TS Recursion Mar 2016 #149

But won't it be grounds for impeachment? Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #69

do they all have private servers? Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2016 #148

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #49

No, classified is not strict liability in most cases Recursion Mar 2016 #151

It is a crime even if she did so with out being aware of what she was doing awake Mar 2016 #12

No it isnt. DCBob Mar 2016 #20

Here's the felony statute. Read it yourself, and then come back: leveymg Mar 2016 #23

No thanks.. I will let FBI Director Comey deal with this. DCBob Mar 2016 #24

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #51

He has 100 agents reviewing tens of thousands of emails. randome Mar 2016 #56

Way to stand up to 104 felonious acts and then rely on the FBI directore to cover it up! Reveals a Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #57

Thank you awake Mar 2016 #28

She has already disrupted the Dem primary process and obtained delegates by fraud and deceit. leveymg Mar 2016 #35

Can she actually give up her pledged delegates to someone else aspirant Mar 2016 #47

The Party can change its own rules to do that. The courts probably wouldn't interfere. leveymg Mar 2016 #52

In todays climate, that would be the end of the DNC. aspirant Mar 2016 #58

As I said, the outcome for the Party only gets worse the longer this gets dragged out. leveymg Mar 2016 #60

This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalArkie Mar 2016 #86

I agree. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #103

It's amazing how these people run for cover when the facts slap them in the face. aspirant Mar 2016 #46

Oh, come on. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #9

Wait, classified when they were SENT? Barack_America Mar 2016 #15

Does it really matter? fbc Mar 2016 #76

In terms of intent, yes. Barack_America Mar 2016 #78

Intent really has nothing to do with these sections of the Espionage Act. The statute is posted leveymg Mar 2016 #93

"The State Department has sidestepped the question. " Jarqui Mar 2016 #25

Thanks. That is all correct, except she can't potentially pardon herself. See, Nixon v US. leveymg Mar 2016 #30

Technically, I thought as president that she can pardon herself. Jarqui Mar 2016 #32

There is a minority view that the president cannot pardon herself. leveymg Mar 2016 #50

I once asked my history professor how the US legal system Jarqui Mar 2016 #53

I would say the question has to be litigated. leveymg Mar 2016 #54

Or Obama could just pardon her and end the matter. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #77

The whole thing should be a complete & utter embarassment to the party. But no, she's being RiverLover Mar 2016 #26

Excellent and accurate post! Thank you! marew Mar 2016 #34

She's being elected by voters, you mean. Slight difference. randome Mar 2016 #36

"Remember, I'm the one who asked that all my emails be made public. ... Jarqui Mar 2016 #37

If the Inspector General is correct then it is in fact a HUGE issue. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #39

Sigh... vdogg Mar 2016 #41

The daily wringing of hands will continue until morale improves. randome Mar 2016 #42

What else are her spokesmen and lawyers supposed to say? leveymg Mar 2016 #48

+1! eom BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #81

The SAP information wasn't classified after the fact. That's the BIG problem she has Press Virginia Mar 2016 #131

Banghazi!!! Dem2 Mar 2016 #59

Sorry. Misused and overused, that innoculation has lost it's potency. leveymg Mar 2016 #61

Misused and overused Dem2 Mar 2016 #63

They say denial is part of the first stage of recovery. You have a ways to go. leveymg Mar 2016 #66

They Say People�s Political Passions Distort Their Sense of Reality Dem2 Mar 2016 #68

Sounds like you should give that study another read. nt leveymg Mar 2016 #92

Swing and a miss. Orsino Mar 2016 #67

When the classifying agency finds it was classified, it's classified. The CIA has found classified leveymg Mar 2016 #71

These are weasel words again. Orsino Mar 2016 #84

Thanks for your comment. BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #82

Also, if this was an Exchange email server, it kept a copy. fbc Mar 2016 #73

If Hillary had behaved like this at a large U.S. corporation her azz would be fired pronto. avaistheone1 Mar 2016 #75

Given that she was a US Gov't official with a security clearance, she merely committed a felony leveymg Mar 2016 #80

Okie dokie... in other words Hillary Clinton is another case of too big to fail. avaistheone1 Mar 2016 #85

That's one way to look at it. ;-) leveymg Mar 2016 #88

If the material was not "classified" when BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #79

yup. Ellipsis Mar 2016 #83

It was already classified by the CIA. See #71 above leveymg Mar 2016 #87

My understanding by the IG is material was "classified" when sent, but not marked as classified. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #107

Sorry, that is not the way it works. BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 #117

The burden is now on you to explain how the law and the facts exonerate her. leveymg Mar 2016 #159

We're sick of hearing about the damn emails. Just another non-scandal. Nitram Mar 2016 #89

There's a 10 year statute of limitations on these violations, so Colin and Condi get a Get Out of leveymg Mar 2016 #91

If it jhsa nothing top do with Sanders then why is it that Bernie supporters Nitram Mar 2016 #94

Quit conflating private emails with private server. Powell did NOT have a private server ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #133

I want the truth to come out. 840high Mar 2016 #141

Right. Which branch of governent calls them classified? Nitram Mar 2016 #95

The originating agency makes that determination. In this case, the CIA. leveymg Mar 2016 #99

Only one outcome? What about dismissing the charges? Nitram Mar 2016 #102

The documents the information came from were marked secret. leveymg Mar 2016 #111

Well, we'll see. Will you email me with an acknowledgement if the "only" outcome doesn't... Nitram Mar 2016 #112

Republicans are desperate as hell. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #96

So now the WaPo's desperate? Along with 2 federal judges, 150 FBI agents,the IGs of the IC and DOS leveymg Mar 2016 #98

Preach it from the rooftops. Your work here is appreciated. nt. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #100

More than anyone else, her supporters need to understand the serious consequences of her actions leveymg Mar 2016 #105

desperate is right bigtree Mar 2016 #106

You really have to wonder about a campaign that creates this sort of problem for its Party leveymg Mar 2016 #110

you're digging into this for purely political reasons bigtree Mar 2016 #115

The problem with such accusations is that you are easily wrong. leveymg Mar 2016 #119

what you wrote there bigtree Mar 2016 #139

As I said you have no idea what my motives are. leveymg Mar 2016 #147

Fail. 840high Mar 2016 #142

Agree. Republicans are failing/flailing on this on. Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #160

She's the only Democrat on the ballot being investigated by the FBI. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #101

... PonyUp Mar 2016 #108

Lol silenttigersong Mar 2016 #125

ha! 840high Mar 2016 #143

This is such a weird election Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2016 #150

"Classified" after the fact. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #104

No. The information was classified by the CIA before Hillary and her aides put it on the server leveymg Mar 2016 #109

Thank you for your patience with this erroneous talking point over and over and over Arazi Mar 2016 #113

prediction bigtree Mar 2016 #116

The truly shameful act is Hillary putting you in a position where you have to defend her leveymg Mar 2016 #118

I can't wait to send Sanders packing bigtree Mar 2016 #144

What's shameful is the fact 840high Mar 2016 #145

Hillary Clinton silenttigersong Mar 2016 #122

and no one seems to get excited about it.... chillfactor Mar 2016 #130

and 2 federal judges, 150 FBI agents, the IGs of the IC and the DOS and leveymg Mar 2016 #138

FBI is excited. 840high Mar 2016 #146

Once again, classified after the fact Kuot420 Mar 2016 #140

Oh, they have a new mud-dragger now. randome Mar 2016 #154

That is a campaign talking point, neither fact nor a legal defense. leveymg Mar 2016 #156

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #161

Like Trump, she could shoot one of you on Times Sq and you'd elect her anyway. That's sad. leveymg Mar 2016 #163

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #164

The Intelligence Community, DOS, 2 federal judges, the FBI consider this a "genuine investigation" leveymg Mar 2016 #165

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #166

Due Diligence in law enforcement doesn't mean putting a criminal case "to bed." leveymg Mar 2016 #167

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #168

The RNC is irrelevant to this case. leveymg Mar 2016 #170

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #171

The report I reposted above is from The Washington Post. Your ad hominem attack is utter BS leveymg Mar 2016 #172

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #173

Thanks for kicking my thread, bro. leveymg Mar 2016 #175

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #176

senator Sanders and I agree MFM008 Mar 2016 #152

they were only made classified after the fact, by partisans against Hillary. Lil Missy Mar 2016 #153

Oh. My. God. rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #155

When she broke the law she set in play a process even more powerful than herself leveymg Mar 2016 #158

If she broke the law rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #177

Prima facie case. Once the CIA identified materials on her server as its own classified info. leveymg Mar 2016 #178

Funny rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #183

K&R aspirant Mar 2016 #157

Hillary KNEW what she was writing was either classified or not. Avalux Mar 2016 #179

On this, she has no defense and nowhere to hide. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #180

It's actually two felonies. leveymg Mar 2016 #181

Well, how 'bout that? nt VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #184

Hillary's signed TS/SCI Nondisclosure Security Agreement here leveymg Mar 2016 #185