2016 Postmortem

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)

18. Sorry to break it to you but the logs that Brian turned over

Reply to 6chars (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:00 PM

Mar 2016

Doesn't cover this time frame. Regardless, the logs aren't the end all in hack detection.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

110 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New Name Surfaces In Clinton's Email Scandal [View all] think Mar 2016 OP

holy hell grasswire Mar 2016 #1

Wow--this sentence sticks out: panader0 Mar 2016 #2

I thought that no one got in. nt WhiteTara Mar 2016 #3

I'm sure she told them to "cut it out". panader0 Mar 2016 #7

but she used Google Translate to do it tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #30

Maybe she used a finger wagging gif. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #79

The lady in the top gif Art_from_Ark Mar 2016 #95

since a Roumanian hacker got in, we know that "nobody got in" is a falsehood being promulgated magical thyme Mar 2016 #10

The hacker got into Blumenthal's computer WhiteTara Mar 2016 #11

oops, you're right. I forgot that... magical thyme Mar 2016 #15

I know you didn't personally WhiteTara Mar 2016 #20

sorry, but there is no proof that it wasn't. the FBI is continuing to look for evidence of hacking magical thyme Mar 2016 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author BlueIdaho Mar 2016 #31

I wrote that about 15 minutes ago magical thyme Mar 2016 #76

I love the ponies magical thyme. saidsimplesimon Mar 2016 #37

Weren't there emails from HRC on Blumenthal's computer? panader0 Mar 2016 #26

Was Blumenthal communicating with Hillary by email? sabrina 1 Mar 2016 #105

Well to be fair. Gwhittey Mar 2016 #32

It's OK, she wiped the server with a cloth Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #40

and sprayed it with Lysol to get rid of the viruses n/t 8 track mind Mar 2016 #69

That story is part of their deliberate obfuscation campaign. jeff47 Mar 2016 #45

it has been proven her server wasn't hacked 6chars Mar 2016 #5

Do they leave logs when they hack a computer? Autumn Mar 2016 #8

not if they're good at it, lol. no "proof" has been provided. nt magical thyme Mar 2016 #16

Then Hillary's guy would have no clue if it was hacked or not. Autumn Mar 2016 #22

he might have seen it if an ammy got in and left signs. but him saying he saw no sign of it does not magical thyme Mar 2016 #24

One of the first things they teach you during a Certified Ethical Hacker course VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #27

um, no. "No sign of hacking" does not equal "not hacked." magical thyme Mar 2016 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author BlueIdaho Mar 2016 #39

Yeah. There's no such thing as "Secretary of States". cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #47

This message was self-deleted by its author BlueIdaho Mar 2016 #68

time for you to repeat reading comprehension class. I'm aware there is no way to prove a negative magical thyme Mar 2016 #75

This message was self-deleted by its author BlueIdaho Mar 2016 #86

huh? magical thyme Mar 2016 #90

This message was self-deleted by its author BlueIdaho Mar 2016 #91

different time markers. We're off by 3 hours. magical thyme Mar 2016 #92

This message was self-deleted by its author BlueIdaho Mar 2016 #93

There is no proof that the Secretary of States computer wasn't hacked. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author BlueIdaho Mar 2016 #102

I think Trump likes pizza too. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #103

Nothing has been 'proven' B2G Mar 2016 #17

Sorry to break it to you but the logs that Brian turned over NWCorona Mar 2016 #18

I think you need to read it again shawn703 Mar 2016 #19

To be fair Gwhittey Mar 2016 #33

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Maedhros Mar 2016 #34

Did their prototype work? HubertHeaver Mar 2016 #54

It was an exact copy of ours.[n/t] Maedhros Mar 2016 #55

But, did it fly? HubertHeaver Mar 2016 #57

Perhaps, perhaps not. Maedhros Mar 2016 #60

LOL. I got it. bvar22 Mar 2016 #83

Not quite, sorry... Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #41

I'm sorry to be the one to have to tell you this, but you can't prove a computer wasn't hacked. PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #42

Nothing of the kind has been "proven." That's just what Pagliano claims from his traffic logs. leveymg Mar 2016 #67

That leapt out at me, too. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #25

Who in the hell Aerows Mar 2016 #85

Amateur hour... (nm) Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #88

Well..... AlbertCat Mar 2016 #36

WOW 840high Mar 2016 #64

This whole thing is just a nightmare. Punkingal Mar 2016 #4

Yes, it is. Duval Mar 2016 #66

K&R Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #6

Yawn . . . Gamecock Lefty Mar 2016 #9

Yawn . . . AlbertCat Mar 2016 #38

Did someone wake from your hibernation from reality? n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #43

K & R AzDar Mar 2016 #12

What email scandal? salinsky Mar 2016 #14

This isn't going away. 99Forever Mar 2016 #21

Nope. Republicans will keep inventing investigations. 6chars Mar 2016 #58

If she had half as much interest ... 99Forever Mar 2016 #65

Holy Fastjack an a 28.8kbps datajack. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #28

can you flesh that out a bit restorefreedom Mar 2016 #98

This means foreign entities with a VERY strong interest in cyber-espionage VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #100

yikes. sounds quite bad. restorefreedom Mar 2016 #106

Oh yeah, it's bad if that's the case. nt VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #109

More sleaze... SoapBox Mar 2016 #29

I am as sick of the Clinton family, as I am of the Bush family. SamKnause Mar 2016 #56

So if Hillary somehow manages to finagle the nomination what will she await? jalan48 Mar 2016 #35

Oh, she will be impeached if the GOP controls the House Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #46

Interesting-you make a good point. jalan48 Mar 2016 #49

People keep underestimating how much the Right hates her Kelvin Mace Mar 2016 #50

Most likely. glinda Mar 2016 #99

Do you realize she won't even care about that? senz Mar 2016 #61

I'm sure she will care. Who wants to be drug through the mud again? jalan48 Mar 2016 #63

I thought her experience zentrum Mar 2016 #44

DUzy! CrispyQ Mar 2016 #53

Don't worry. She can evolve on security later. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #78

Yes, she'll have to zentrum Mar 2016 #80

She can release her security breaches, after every other country does.... n/t Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #81

Note these dates: Server set up & operated while HRC SOS 1/2009-2/2013. Virus detected "late 2013" leveymg Mar 2016 #48

Thank you for the recap and in depth information. I didn't take much notice of the emails think Mar 2016 #59

did you compile this, leveymg? grasswire Mar 2016 #70

No. I linked the source of the timeline. leveymg Mar 2016 #71

reminds me of the problem finding George W's record of service. grasswire Mar 2016 #72

And the evidence left behind is just tainted enough so as to trap the unwary. leveymg Mar 2016 #73

yep. I posted a query in the Bernie group for some research.. grasswire Mar 2016 #74

See if someone can ID the server type and model from the 12-digit serial no OCC47A14C332 leveymg Mar 2016 #82

Bookmarking OP for your timeline entry Oilwellian Mar 2016 #84

+1 mmonk Mar 2016 #110

Roll it... PeoViejo Mar 2016 #51

I object to the word "Scandal" in the heading. No Vested Interest Mar 2016 #52

Your objection is noted and overruled by the facts. Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #62

I agree. ClusterFuck would be more accurate. Disaster or Catastrophe if you want to be nice. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #77

I would go with enigma. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #87

That was my first impression also philosslayer Mar 2016 #107

"CloudJacket security device was purchased and installed ... in late 2013" Jarqui Mar 2016 #89

Things have to be getting pretty stressful in the home office Fairgo Mar 2016 #94

I've always been inclined to go with Bernie on htis eridani Mar 2016 #96

I use to think it was pretty much a non issue as well. But now I'm not so sure. think Mar 2016 #97

K N R-ed Faux pas Mar 2016 #104

What is this Clinton Executive Service Corp? noamnety Mar 2016 #108