Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TTUBatfan2008

(3,623 posts)
1. It's a losing issue for her...
Thu Mar 10, 2016, 12:00 PM
Mar 2016

...both in the primary and in a general election against Trump. If you think Sanders is hammering her for it, just wait until Trump gets going on this topic. Chuck Todd pointed out that Trump has had very protectionist trade views since at least 1987. It's apparently the one issue where he has not had major flip-flips. Obviously she can kill him on immigration, racism, and so on. But I think she will have a tough time in the Rust Belt against Trump because of the trade issue.

Free trade as it has been pushed by both parties for a long time means corporations outsourcing jobs overseas for slave labor and then selling the products to the American people. I agree with you that automation has hurt the manufacturing industry, but this doesn't absolve our political leaders for the policies we have in place. Apple uses slave labor in China. Apple was not making iPhones back when you were working on auto assembly. There are manufacturing jobs that could be in the U.S. for a decent wage, but our current trade agreements allow corporations to engage in downright immoral manufacturing processes overseas.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Free Trade and Clinton vs...»Reply #1