2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: So. FL, MO, NC, OH, and IL vote on Tuesday. My predictions. [View all]Jarqui
(10,131 posts)Which states have voted and which have not are facts.
What is going on in the race are facts (ie the AP article outlining things Clinton claimed in the FL debate that they feel are not true or accurate or the results of the debate that might affect the polls).
Demographics are facts.
What are the candidates doing in advertising are facts.
Is a given primary a pure vote or is it a caucus is a fact.
Which states are they campaigning in and by or with who are facts.
Whether the state primary is open or closed and when registration ends are facts.
The number of delegates award in the election for each state are facts.
When the various primaries take place are facts.
The tally of the delegates for each candidate are facts.
The number of delegates required to win is a fact.
You pathetically asked "what facts?". The above are some examples of facts that each of us probably considered in developing our thoughts on those facts. Again, so many facts, it's perplexing that you'd even have to ask.
If you really think those facts or our discussion about them is propaganda, maybe we should feel sorry for you because with an apparent problem with basic vocabulary, you do not appear to be up for this level of discussion.
When the folks on 538.com or Daily Kos or a GOP forum discuss among themselves polls and projections, etc, do you really believe that back and forth discussion is "pure emotional propaganda"?
It is not "pure emotional propaganda" to discuss those facts and where the upcoming state contests might lead us openly on a forum. That is a back and forth discussion of the facts and an opinion expressed by each of the two in that discussion on where those facts might lead us on March 15th expressed between two posters on this site who looked at those facts.
In the middle of that nice discussion, you weigh in with your clueless bullshit allegation about propaganda.
In trying to apply the term "pure emotional propaganda" to our discussion, it's really beyond debate that you do not really understand the word "propaganda". I'm sure it's obvious to many wasting their time reading this that you just don't. And it appears that you're just trolling for an argument using words to you do not fully understand to make unfounded allegations.