Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton's Reagan AIDS Revisionism Is SHOCKING, INSULTING & Utterly INEXPLICABLE [View all]mountain grammy
(29,050 posts)30. They weren't exactly silent
there were the jokes and the condemnation. Guess Hillary remembers it differently than I do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Clinton's Reagan AIDS Revisionism Is SHOCKING, INSULTING & Utterly INEXPLICABLE [View all]
Segami
Mar 2016
OP
If you read her statement closely, hidden in the rhetoric, she really says nothing. Something like
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#5
What she meant to say was, because the Reagans did dipshit nothing, people who were most affected by
Baitball Blogger
Mar 2016
#14
It's really tough to twist & turn to find your constituency, & a needless ploy to pick up Reaganites
highprincipleswork
Mar 2016
#11
I was walking to work one day listening to WBAI and someone was talking about
mikehiggins
Mar 2016
#32
While conservatives might think abortion does not fit with family values
passiveporcupine
Mar 2016
#39
The Reagan's refused to allow discussion on AIDS. Correct, it will back fire on Clinton.
DhhD
Mar 2016
#37
It's NOT revisionism, why did you stop reading the "news" with that comment? Have you seen....
George II
Mar 2016
#35
Isn't the subject her comment on Reagan's AIDS record? What does Reagan's SG have to do...
George II
Mar 2016
#41