Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mountain grammy

(29,050 posts)
30. They weren't exactly silent
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 08:53 PM
Mar 2016

there were the jokes and the condemnation. Guess Hillary remembers it differently than I do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And if she did "misspeak", then what did she really mean to say dana_b Mar 2016 #1
If you read her statement closely, hidden in the rhetoric, she really says nothing. Something like rhett o rick Mar 2016 #5
good point dana_b Mar 2016 #12
What she meant to say was, because the Reagans did dipshit nothing, people who were most affected by Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #14
A word flub is one thing.... Segami Mar 2016 #7
I recognize a rhetorical question when I see it. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #15
I'm guessing that she sincerely meant what she said,...... HeartoftheMidwest Mar 2016 #16
Not the one in which so many men I knew died elljay Mar 2016 #29
Exactly! And WHY pander to Reagan fans since they will never vote for her? PatrickforO Mar 2016 #27
She even lies at a funeral. choie Mar 2016 #2
And this is a surprise? HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #3
She's beyond the pale... haikugal Mar 2016 #4
This was her honest belief of the Reagans. morningfog Mar 2016 #6
Wonder how this is going over with the LGBT crowd EndElectoral Mar 2016 #8
I'll tell you how it's going over with me, one member of the LGBT crowd Boomer Mar 2016 #38
What is the explanation? I really don't know. Vattel Mar 2016 #9
A very unfortunate xplanation here... AllTooEasy Mar 2016 #22
She misspoke passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #34
This would be a good time for Hillary to apologize. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #10
It's really tough to twist & turn to find your constituency, & a needless ploy to pick up Reaganites highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #11
Sniff, sniff, sniff, sniff.... Segami Mar 2016 #46
Ready...fire....aim! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #13
It's not inexplicable. Hissyspit Mar 2016 #17
you have got to be shitting me....n/t 8 track mind Mar 2016 #18
She's trying to zentrum Mar 2016 #19
Painful and disheartening the disconnect. Amimnoch Mar 2016 #20
Even her revised history is disgusting Geronimoe Mar 2016 #21
Wait til Rush Limbaugh gets a wind of this!! JohnnyRingo Mar 2016 #23
it won't be. people died. roguevalley Mar 2016 #24
Now you're saying Clinton caused AIDS deaths? JohnnyRingo Mar 2016 #42
I was walking to work one day listening to WBAI and someone was talking about mikehiggins Mar 2016 #32
Are you saying the Clintons did what the Reagans did? JohnnyRingo Mar 2016 #44
WOW! Iggo Mar 2016 #25
Dan Savage has something to say: HeartoftheMidwest Mar 2016 #26
Crap like this is why Reagan has such a lofty legacy. bulloney Mar 2016 #28
And Nancy was a Home Wrecker Ccarmona Mar 2016 #31
While conservatives might think abortion does not fit with family values passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #39
They weren't exactly silent mountain grammy Mar 2016 #30
This type of OP and theme is going to backfire, big time. George II Mar 2016 #33
The Reagan's refused to allow discussion on AIDS. Correct, it will back fire on Clinton. DhhD Mar 2016 #37
Its a quote of a headline SheenaR Mar 2016 #43
+1 BeanMusical Mar 2016 #45
It's NOT revisionism, why did you stop reading the "news" with that comment? Have you seen.... George II Mar 2016 #35
So Clinton supports the Reagan's on abortion that has not been revised? DhhD Mar 2016 #40
Isn't the subject her comment on Reagan's AIDS record? What does Reagan's SG have to do... George II Mar 2016 #41
She does this with her own record too farleftlib Mar 2016 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton's Reagan ...»Reply #30