Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Karmadillo

(9,253 posts)
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:23 AM Mar 2016

What’s Wrong With Hillary? [View all]

Let's hope Tuesday's results will set us on a path where Hillary's many liabilities won't take the party down in November.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/hillary-clinton-2016-whats-wrong-with-hillary-213722

What’s Wrong With Hillary?
The GOP is fretting about Trump, but the Democrats’ likely standard-bearer could do just as much damage to her own party.
By Jeff Greenfield
March 14, 2016

When Hillary Clinton began her second run for the White House, it must have seemed that the road ahead would rise up to meet her. This time, there would be no political phenomenon in her way—no younger, more charismatic figure who would strip Clinton of the mantle of “change.” All that stood between her and the nomination were a 74-year old socialist from Vermont and the obscure former governor of a state whose previous best-known politician was Spiro Agnew. Back then, if you had told Clinton’s campaign that she would be outraised by that Vermont socialist, that she would be losing younger Democrats, including young women, by landslide proportions, and that she would be facing a months-long slog through every primary—you would have been accused of smoking some of that now-legal-in-Colorado product.

So what exactly is going on here? Why won’t Bernie Sanders go away? And why does Hillary Clinton’s Bernie problem pose a danger not only to her but to the Democratic Party—even if she does (as it seems highly likely) secure her party’s nomination? Three big reasons: First, Hillary Clinton commands little trust among an electorate that is driven today by mistrust. Second, her public life—the posts she has held, the positions she has adopted (and jettisoned)—define her as a creature of the “establishment” at a time when voters regard the very idea with deep antipathy. And finally, however she wishes it were not so, however much she argues that she represents the future as America’s first prospective female president, Clinton still embodies the past, just as she did in 2008 when she lost to Barack Obama. The combination of those three factors is already playing out in the Democratic primary, where younger voters are turning away from her and embracing a geriatric, white-haired alternative in droves.

The far more serious issue is whether all these factors will seriously threaten her prospects and those of the Democratic Party in November—even at the hands of Donald Trump.
True, the road ahead is still more or less rising in her direction. Clinton leads her likely opponent, Trump, by a significant margin. He—or indeed any GOP nominee—will come out of the convention with his party bitterly, perhaps hopelessly, divided. A Washington Post-ABC News poll reports that nearly two-thirds of Americans say she has the kind of experience necessary to be president. No wonder betting markets make her a nearly 2-to-1 favorite in November.

But there are other factors that make Hillary Clinton look more vulnerable than venerable, and that should give her party cause to pause. Consider the much-chewed-over finding that nearly six in 10 Americans do not consider Clinton honest and trustworthy. In last Wednesday’s debate, panelist Karen Tumulty cut through Clinton’s first explanation—it’s all that right-wing Fox News noise—to note that these doubts were held by the broader public, and by many in her own party.

more...

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What’s Wrong With Hillary? [View all] Karmadillo Mar 2016 OP
It's the return of the 90s-style scaredy-cat Democrat BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #1
In her usual style, she will wet her finger and stick it to the political winds. Because her silvershadow Mar 2016 #5
I don't mean to find fault with what you said, but "overreaching at Nancy's funeral" Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #14
On the other hand, her instincts on ignoring certain unappeasable critics are still pretty good BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #20
Given how far right she is from the political centre, the number of Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #21
isnt jeff greenfield a right wing hack...? artyteacher Mar 2016 #2
I guess if you call a former speech writer for Robert F. Kennedy a right wing hack. marew Mar 2016 #8
Thank you. Octafish Mar 2016 #31
The new definition of "right-wing hack" is "anyone who says anything negative about Hillary" (n/t) Jim Lane Mar 2016 #33
no, he came to speak at my campus one time NJCher Mar 2016 #12
Greenfield has always been very astute.... Punkingal Mar 2016 #15
OFFS Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #32
Hillary is a creature of old time Party politics. SheilaT Mar 2016 #3
You're right...she will never understand what has happened, win or lose. Punkingal Mar 2016 #17
her sense of victimization will kick in grasswire Mar 2016 #27
And none but her most die-hard supporters SheilaT Mar 2016 #29
Quote: "The problem for Clinton... " Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #4
Thoughtful. Excellent. Well worth reading every word of the full text. n/t Tom Rinaldo Mar 2016 #6
Yes it was n/t underpants Mar 2016 #7
I thought so. nt m-lekktor Mar 2016 #9
Go Bernie!!! Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #10
Bernie has gone easy on her all along; but the repugs would not; lose in landslide amborin Mar 2016 #11
where younger voters are turning away from her and embracing a geriatric, white-haired alternative PatrynXX Mar 2016 #13
Ignores the #1 Reason: THe DISASTROUS policies which have devastated the working class and is Skwmom Mar 2016 #16
However weak she may be, she has mastered the art of misspeaking and obvious attempts of CYA. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #18
Good column by Greenfield but why he did he pull his punch at the end? BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #19
Too bad they didn't listen the first time we rejected her. She's an awful, awful candidate Arugula Latte Mar 2016 #22
This!! " It’s almost as if her brain and tongue were on a seven-second delay". And this - jillan Mar 2016 #23
A pointed message in a very good article. earthside Mar 2016 #24
Very good. H2O Man Mar 2016 #30
What's not wrong with Hillary is a much shorter list. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #25
My dislike of Hillary is very simple. I want to vote for a liberal, Hillary is a conservative. Todays_Illusion Mar 2016 #26
Another article assuming Hillary is still the One PATRICK Mar 2016 #28
'If we are going to nominate someone who 50% of our people can't stand, elleng Mar 2016 #34
What's NOT wrong ith Hillary would be the much shorter answer Lorien Mar 2016 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What’s Wrong With Hillary...»Reply #0