2016 Postmortem

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)

35. Who plotted to ban people?

Reply to William769 (Reply #34)

Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:50 PM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Clintons should be disqualified from public office [View all] Prism Mar 2016 OP

Well, it's a measure that might create undesirable precedents. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #1

And this disqualifies Hillary from public office how? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #2

People who have that going on should not be running things Prism Mar 2016 #4

I don't see a connection to Hillary, how do you involve Hillary? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #9

This has nothing to do with the Clintons. leftofcool Mar 2016 #11

Didn't read the article and Clinton's involvement, did you. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #13

This is how it's done. Throw something ugly out there, just say the Clintons are connected or Jitter65 Mar 2016 #51

Evidently denial is just a river in Egypt to you. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #52

This going on while she was an attorney and First Lady of Arkansas, Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #58

Are you familiar with the real history of blood donations during this period of time? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #59

Her "resume" includes her time as spouse. Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #60

I read the links, this does not disqualify her in any way of being elected Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #64

Sure. Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #65

Thank you. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #69

Nothing there comes close to disqualifying her for office. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #3

Like I said Prism Mar 2016 #5

1) I never said I was fine with it. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #7

I read that this morning and I've been sick about it all day. Punkingal Mar 2016 #6

What did Hillary Clinton do in this scenario? Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #8

What does a program that started in 1967 have to do with Hillary? leftofcool Mar 2016 #10

What did Nancy and Ron have to do with starting the conversation on AIDS? Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #21

I knew nothing about this and rather than believe one link I looked into this. WOW Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #12

I sent that link to Stephanie Miller pdsimdars Mar 2016 #14

I can't listen to her anymore either. hedda_foil Mar 2016 #41

More RW talking points rechurned ... meh n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #15

Not sure how this is a right wing talking point. Maybe you should watch the Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #16

This is what republicans have been throwing out at Clintons cosmicone Mar 2016 #17

Her history is tainted with controversy. smiley Mar 2016 #40

So Bernie and his disciples recycle dead controversies cosmicone Mar 2016 #44

I believe it is you whining about controversies... smiley Mar 2016 #47

How can you laugh at this? dana_b Mar 2016 #61

No one except Bernie supporters cares about mudslinging at Hillary. n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #66

So you dismiss a factual issue calling it RW talking points and at the same time... Docreed2003 Mar 2016 #54

You linked to wnd in your above post obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #26

Sorry I was doing that for the review. Didn't notice the site. Here are other reviews Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #32

A cancer is something that invades the body. We all know what invaded the democratic body. William769 Mar 2016 #18

Yes, the corporate minions and their willing enablers. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #20

I'll live Prism Mar 2016 #22

Ah there's that honey dripping charm the Clinton crowd is so well known for. Not a word about the Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #23

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #27

Please fee free to point out the "liberal hate", yes that's a challange. William769 Mar 2016 #29

Proving my point, once again. arcane1 Mar 2016 #30

Oy vey. William769 Mar 2016 #31

Like the hate on Bernie posted in your little group and on your site? hobbit709 Mar 2016 #33

And there's no hate right here on DU about Hillary! William769 Mar 2016 #34

Who plotted to ban people? hobbit709 Mar 2016 #35

Cowards run and hide, after all. It's their nature. arcane1 Mar 2016 #36

So not up to the challenge I see. William769 Mar 2016 #42

Lmao. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #39

Yeah I'll bet you'd hate to be the American people, too senz Mar 2016 #24

I'll proudly stand with Prism. Maedhros Mar 2016 #28

and Hillary supporters are the chemotherapy !! n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #37

Sometimes it's not the cancer that kills, it's the chemo notadmblnd Mar 2016 #53

Thank you cancer specialist cosmicone Mar 2016 #68

My pleasure. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #72

Doesn't chemo also cause diarrhea, vomiting and loss of appetite? JackBeck Mar 2016 #73

Do the mods have a powerful anti-Clinton bias? Onlooker Mar 2016 #19

The owners of this site are wildly Pro Clinton. Your job is to offer a sound objection to stories Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #25

I read the article and the references at the bottom Dem2 Mar 2016 #38

Prism, I'll just say Aerows Mar 2016 #43

Ironically, the legal doctrine preventing what you're calling for is called "corruption of blood" Recursion Mar 2016 #45

Your subject line is exactly my thought when I read this Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #46

There's no way she will ever become the President now. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #48

Hillary's name doesn't appear anywhere in there bigtree Mar 2016 #49

I love Bernie Sanders but... jcgoldie Mar 2016 #56

so putting BS in the WH guarantees an end to these scandals . . . got it DrDan Mar 2016 #50

That has absolutely nothing to do with it. A non-sequitur at best, a deflection at worst. n/t djean111 Mar 2016 #63

a manufactured issue period DrDan Mar 2016 #67

Sure jcgoldie Mar 2016 #55

Pretty awful hallio Mar 2016 #57

Thank you Prism Kalidurga Mar 2016 #62

That's pretty sad and tragic, but not Bill Clinton's fault, much less Hillary's Gram Parsons Mar 2016 #70

Quoting from the article noamnety Mar 2016 #71