Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Here are the facts about Bain and KB Toys, much worse than 'Vulture' Capitalism [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)13. Your facts are wrong, Romney continued to recieve profits after he left, functioning
as a vested partner:
1) Romney negotiated to continue to receive profits from Bain after he left;
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/19/us/politics/retirement-deal-keeps-bain-money-flowing-to-romney.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all
In what would be the final deal of his private equity career, he negotiated a retirement agreement with his former partners that has paid him a share of Bains profits ever since, bringing the Romney family millions of dollars in income each year and bolstering the fortune that has helped finance Mr. Romneys political aspirations,
. . .
Though Mr. Romney left Bain in early 1999, he received a share of the corporate buyout and investment profits enjoyed by partners from all Bain deals through February 2009: four global buyout funds and 18 other funds, more than twice as many over all as Mr. Romney had a share of the year he left. He was also given the right to invest his own money alongside his former partners. Because some of the funds and deals covered by Mr. Romneys agreement will not fully wind down for several years, Mr. Romney is still entitled to a share of some of Bains profits.
This is not guilt by 'association' this is guilt by taking the profits of the deal and putting it into his pocket.
However it goes beyond that;
2) Romney isn't just the guy who carried out trades, he is the guy who created the blueprint
http://nymag.com/print/?/news/politics/mitt-romney-2011-10/
Romney developed one of the tools that made this possible, pioneering the use of takeovers to change the way a business functioned, remaking it in the name of efficiency. �Whatever you think of his politics, you have to give him credit,� says Steven Kaplan, a professor of finance and entrepreneurship at the University of Chicago. �He came up with a model that was very successful and very innovative and that now everybody uses.�
Even if he didn't profit from it, which he did, or it wasn't his company that did it, which it was, you could still tie him to it for using the Romney model. In this case the Romney model WAS used by HIS company and HE did receive profits from it.
3) Romney has promoted his candidacy by association to Bain and the Olympics and being Governor. If he is going to take all of the successes for Bain (and I am willing to accept that there were many) then he also has to accept the problems as well, atleast until he denounces them. The same would be true for his time as Governor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here are the facts about Bain and KB Toys, much worse than 'Vulture' Capitalism [View all]
grantcart
Jan 2012
OP
This needs to be publicized -- know anyone in political circles at DNC or better yet,
Remember Me
Jan 2012
#6
Your facts are wrong, Romney continued to recieve profits after he left, functioning
grantcart
Jan 2012
#13
Me too. Grantcart really lifted the lid on Mitt's Pandora's Box with this thread.
Major Hogwash
Jan 2012
#35