Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
73. That will be the challenge.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:34 AM
Mar 2016

The Clinton individual donation money will likely increase, and the Sanders smaller donations will start to fall away. After a while, people start to realize that their efforts are not going to produce the desired result, and in the case of some people, they have no wish to give money to one candidate to have it spent on the other one.

K & R enthusiastically. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #1
K&R! stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #2
The article goes on to say madaboutharry Mar 2016 #3
The article goes on to say, effectively, eomer Mar 2016 #13
But what about 2008 Serial Mom Mar 2016 #36
Not true, actually. eomer Mar 2016 #43
Obama took himself off the ballot NobodyHere Mar 2016 #99
Hillary got more votes in the states where she was the only one on the ballot. eomer Mar 2016 #106
The fact is we don;t actually HAVE one man, one vote. Adrahil Mar 2016 #50
Agreed, it is a steep climb. eomer Mar 2016 #83
Eomer: SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #54
No, I said the author is not a democrat with a small "d". eomer Mar 2016 #84
The author was writing a factual story SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #85
The author states as fact something that isn't determined yet and that many of us advocate against. eomer Mar 2016 #86
My last comment SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #92
Thanks, but no. eomer Mar 2016 #94
I respectfully disagree. lovemydog Mar 2016 #100
I don't see that in the article. Please paste in the relevant paragraph. yellowcanine Mar 2016 #67
Here eomer Mar 2016 #82
Author gets the numbers wrong a bit. But it doesn't lead to your conclusion. yellowcanine Mar 2016 #88
No, the author doesn't get the numbers wrong. He's just counting super delegates. eomer Mar 2016 #89
When has America ever advocated that? Bad Dog Mar 2016 #70
Party Principals Billsmile Mar 2016 #21
That was a different party. madaboutharry Mar 2016 #30
That's bullshit. Even if there is only a marginal chance morningfog Mar 2016 #37
Hillary won the backward areas of the country which were anothergreenbus Mar 2016 #57
Backward states like OH, MA, FL, IL? redstateblues Mar 2016 #65
LOL--we "backward" types in Boston can barely git in all our huntin' and trappin' and MADem Mar 2016 #74
LOL. lovemydog Mar 2016 #103
If that's your opinion I disagree and here's why: lovemydog Mar 2016 #95
K&R Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #4
No she is not jfern Mar 2016 #5
Then I do hope the polls I've seen are dead wrong crim son Mar 2016 #6
We've seen a lot of wrong polls Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #28
Not sure what polls you are looking at ... Persondem Mar 2016 #39
Link to the polls you see? Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #72
After listening to the talking heads, I think she's also the presumptive Republican nominee. Vinca Mar 2016 #7
It looks that way now but shadowandblossom Mar 2016 #48
If they take it away from Trump, that will cause a split. Vinca Mar 2016 #97
I hear you. I think he will probably be the nominee anyway. shadowandblossom Mar 2016 #105
First she has to get the requisite delegates. longship Mar 2016 #8
the math is not there for sanders to gain the dlegate lead with what hillary has amassed now beachbum bob Mar 2016 #10
Let's see what Hillary Clinton says about that. longship Mar 2016 #11
sanders won't drop out for obvious reasons but her lead is now beachbum bob Mar 2016 #23
Insurmountable? No. Difficult? Yes. A Simple Game Mar 2016 #32
Here, here! chwaliszewski Mar 2016 #12
You guys have said so for a year and it's still not truer than it was 12 months ago. eom Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #9
Hmmmm... Shadowflash Mar 2016 #14
You didn't miss the part where Clinton earned over half the pledged delegates.... Raster Mar 2016 #104
The word is "Presumptuous." dchill Mar 2016 #15
everyone seems to agree with that now . . . well, everyone except for a few here DrDan Mar 2016 #16
DU rec... SidDithers Mar 2016 #17
U R right Botany Mar 2016 #26
There's a parade today on Wall St. Spread the word. Broward Mar 2016 #18
K&R! stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #19
WRONG! RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #20
And what if Bernie does better in the second half than Hillary did in the first? eomer Mar 2016 #22
Yes, Hillary folk have been telling us she is the nominee since she announced. peacebird Mar 2016 #61
Don't be so presumptuous. She's not gonna beat Bernie johnlucas Mar 2016 #24
Yeah no, Democratic is first in the name here for a reason n/t Godhumor Mar 2016 #29
Notice how UNDERGROUND supports DEMOCRATIC in the logo. This is a gravity-based world. johnlucas Mar 2016 #31
Yeah, I remember my first beer too, kid. CorkySt.Clair Mar 2016 #40
And the About page mentions that DU is a liberal discussion board for liberals. A Simple Game Mar 2016 #34
When this site was new, to be a Democrat was to be underground gollygee Mar 2016 #33
What the hell is a "Democrat"? What does that mean if there're no principles behind it? johnlucas Mar 2016 #38
I think you'd do well to review the TOS. nt MADem Mar 2016 #45
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #52
No, it isn't. It's the guidelines that spell out behavior at this PRIVATE website. MADem Mar 2016 #55
When nobody's in the house anymore, it becomes a dilapidated property johnlucas Mar 2016 #64
Well, I've been here since the very beginning, and this IS a home to me and many others. MADem Mar 2016 #69
Yawn shawn703 Mar 2016 #25
Yawn billhicks76 Mar 2016 #27
...and will lose her votes Madam Mossfern Mar 2016 #35
My state hasn't voted yet, so no, she is not. blackspade Mar 2016 #41
I admit. Else You Are Mad Mar 2016 #42
Nope warrprayer Mar 2016 #44
That title has a bit of a "Hail Mary" element to it--and Sanders is no Doug Flutie. MADem Mar 2016 #51
To keep the money rolling in they have to say that hack89 Mar 2016 #53
This is an important point. Thank you! anothergreenbus Mar 2016 #66
That will be the challenge. MADem Mar 2016 #73
And what makes you think: Herman4747 Mar 2016 #87
I just went and donated--that's a start! LOL! MADem Mar 2016 #90
Trouble is, this fellow here also regards her as a friend... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #91
That kind of immature carping is beneath you. MADem Mar 2016 #93
It's not just a photo. Herman4747 Mar 2016 #96
Not sure what you think you are proving, but doubling down isn't making your case. MADem Mar 2016 #98
Okay, I guess you have kept your head in the sand... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #107
I'm not going to play the sea lion game with you. MADem Mar 2016 #108
It's been wisely said that "None are so blind as he who will not see." Herman4747 Mar 2016 #110
I'm looking forward to seeing Clinton nominated and elected. MADem Mar 2016 #111
And should the day come, where a little girl approaches you... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #112
smdh! A churlish attitude won't change reality. MADem Mar 2016 #114
I suppose it doesn't help... Herman4747 Mar 2016 #115
I'm not going to play a "let's exchange a list of virtues" game with you. MADem Mar 2016 #116
Being there for the LGBT community??? Herman4747 Mar 2016 #117
And yours did the same--despite telling YOU otherwise-- in 2006. MADem Mar 2016 #118
Okay, so when she meant "the Iranian government" Herman4747 Mar 2016 #119
And now your response is "She is too damn dumb....?" MADem Mar 2016 #120
And I know why you "didn't read the rest" Herman4747 Mar 2016 #121
I didn't read the rest because you were trending towards petulant and abusive. nt MADem Mar 2016 #122
It's only over warrprayer Mar 2016 #79
I think its obvious.... markj757 Mar 2016 #46
Well, this voter LittleGirl Mar 2016 #47
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #49
Please inform us... brooklynite Mar 2016 #58
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #63
You're being confronted with an obstreperous inability to confront facts at this stage. MADem Mar 2016 #75
I think so also, and welcome! peacebird Mar 2016 #62
More like farewell. He didn't last but a minute. nt MADem Mar 2016 #109
K&R mcar Mar 2016 #56
Hasn't she been the presumptive nominee for a couple of years now? (presumptuous) pdsimdars Mar 2016 #59
Wasn't she always? Not news to me. nt thereismore Mar 2016 #60
So what you're saying to all those enthusiastic young folks who are mountain grammy Mar 2016 #68
+1 vintx Mar 2016 #77
at least that's what they like you to think silvershadow Mar 2016 #71
Slot can happen maindawg Mar 2016 #76
Good news for both Dems is rubio dropping out. liberalnarb Mar 2016 #78
Hillary Clinton Is Now the Presumptive Democratic Nominee AlbertCat Mar 2016 #80
Just like she was back when she announced she was running... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #81
So we're back to square one? HassleCat Mar 2016 #101
Clinton's lead of 300 - double the largest lead Barack Obama ever had over Hillary Clinton in 2008. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #102
Bernie will do well from here on out, for four reasons wiggs Mar 2016 #113
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Is Now th...»Reply #73