Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)

10. I don't disagree.

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 16, 2016, 10:18 AM

Mar 2016

Not actually impossible...but very, very close to it.

*shrug* It's not like I feel I have any choice but to stick with Bernie until the actual nomination is made. He's the only candidate, with the possible exception of Jill Stein, that is anywhere near my views.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Won Delegates Clinton 1112, Sanders 806 [View all] liberalmike27 Mar 2016 OP

That's nice. Which states do you predict Sanders will lose and what margins will Sanders need Renew Deal Mar 2016 #1

just checked a few polls - winning big in ND, SD, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana DrDan Mar 2016 #7

There are Democrats in ND, SD, Wyoming, Idaho and Montana? Stallion Mar 2016 #19

Talk about red states. The reddest of the red. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #20

exactly - big wins there will do nothing to offset one loss (or tie) in NY, CA, or PA DrDan Mar 2016 #25

Oh, really. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #2

324 delegates is virtually impossible to make up. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #3

I don't disagree. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #10

Looking over the numbers, I'm again confident in Bernie's chances to win this. Gregorian Mar 2016 #4

I too am confident Jenny_92808 Mar 2016 #23

Thirty States left, liberalmike27 Mar 2016 #5

Is California winner take all? n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #9

Not for Democrats Renew Deal Mar 2016 #11

No Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #12

No. As has been pointed out dozens of times... Garrett78 Mar 2016 #14

I didn't think so, it was question to a post by the OP. n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #15

I know. And the OP is wrong on many counts. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #17

I didn't think any Democratic primaries are winner-take-all. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #13

Proportional NCTraveler Mar 2016 #18

With what you just said... NCTraveler Mar 2016 #16

No . . . Califoria is NOT winner-takes-all. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #24

If you want to stare at a chart for a bit liberalmike27 Mar 2016 #6

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #8

K N R-ed Faux pas Mar 2016 #21

Yes, he's collecting lots of delegates and four months is an eternity in politics. pa28 Mar 2016 #22

BS would have to win 70% of the remaining states completely..... Historic NY Mar 2016 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author Mudcat Mar 2016 #27

That's incorrect. They're only split by approx. 300 delegates. Gregorian Mar 2016 #28

Actually, only 24 states, DC and three territories have not voted. LonePirate Mar 2016 #29

"truth is, last night wasn't too bad" --I totally agree. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #30