Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LonePirate

(14,323 posts)
29. Actually, only 24 states, DC and three territories have not voted.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 01:01 PM
Mar 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016


Here are the pledged delegate counts for the remaining primaries and caucuses:

AZ: 75
ID: 23
UT: 33
AK: 16
HI: 25
WA: 101
WI: 86
WY: 14
NY: 247
CT: 55
DE: 21
MD: 95
PA: 189
RI: 24
IN: 83
Guam: 7
WV: 29
KY: 55
OR: 61
Virgin Islands: 7
Puerto Rico: 60
CA: 475
MT: 21
NJ: 126
NM: 34
ND: 18
SD: 20
DC: 20

Total pledged remaining: 2005

HRC leads Bernie by a little over 300 pledged delegates. Bernie must win roughly 1165 to HRC's 840 in order to win a majority of pledged delegates. That amounts to just over 58% of the remaining pledged delegates (or a 58/42 split from all of the remaining contests).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's nice. Which states do you predict Sanders will lose and what margins will Sanders need Renew Deal Mar 2016 #1
just checked a few polls - winning big in ND, SD, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana DrDan Mar 2016 #7
There are Democrats in ND, SD, Wyoming, Idaho and Montana? Stallion Mar 2016 #19
Talk about red states. The reddest of the red. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #20
exactly - big wins there will do nothing to offset one loss (or tie) in NY, CA, or PA DrDan Mar 2016 #25
Oh, really. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #2
324 delegates is virtually impossible to make up. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #3
I don't disagree. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #10
Looking over the numbers, I'm again confident in Bernie's chances to win this. Gregorian Mar 2016 #4
I too am confident Jenny_92808 Mar 2016 #23
Thirty States left, liberalmike27 Mar 2016 #5
Is California winner take all? n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #9
Not for Democrats Renew Deal Mar 2016 #11
No Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #12
No. As has been pointed out dozens of times... Garrett78 Mar 2016 #14
I didn't think so, it was question to a post by the OP. n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #15
I know. And the OP is wrong on many counts. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #17
I didn't think any Democratic primaries are winner-take-all. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #13
Proportional NCTraveler Mar 2016 #18
With what you just said... NCTraveler Mar 2016 #16
No . . . Califoria is NOT winner-takes-all. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #24
If you want to stare at a chart for a bit liberalmike27 Mar 2016 #6
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #8
K N R-ed Faux pas Mar 2016 #21
Yes, he's collecting lots of delegates and four months is an eternity in politics. pa28 Mar 2016 #22
BS would have to win 70% of the remaining states completely..... Historic NY Mar 2016 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Mudcat Mar 2016 #27
That's incorrect. They're only split by approx. 300 delegates. Gregorian Mar 2016 #28
Actually, only 24 states, DC and three territories have not voted. LonePirate Mar 2016 #29
"truth is, last night wasn't too bad" --I totally agree. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Won Delegates Clinton 111...»Reply #29