Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
30. "truth is, last night wasn't too bad" --I totally agree.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 01:25 PM
Mar 2016

But--viewing this as a 'horse race' (which is a narrow way to look at it)--we need to factor in the ENORMOUS HANDICAPS that have been imposed on the Bernie Sanders campaign from the beginning, from the outside. These include:

--the current Clinton/Corporate narrative that "it's over"
--the past Clinton/Corporate narratives that it was "over" at each marker on the racecourse
--the beginning Clinton/Corporate narrative that our 'Seabiscuit' never had a chance
--the cumulative impact of all of these narratives: NO COVERAGE
--the heavily imposed Corporate narrative that it's a 'horse race' and NOT ABOUT IDEAS
--the brainwashing and heavy dumbing down of the American electorate
--the shocking 99% coverage handed to Trump vs a campaign of IDEAS (Sanders)--TWO insurgent campaigns, one gets 24/7 coverage, the other gets, oh, 0.01% grudging notice after huge wins

--the Democratic National Committee's incredibly unfair bias toward Clinton
--the existing system of pay-to-play that puts almost all Dem elected officials in debt to Clinton/DNC
--all Dem elected officials (& most candidates) dependent on corporate/billionaire $ (unlike Sanders who rejects it)
--almost all Dem party officials & leaders part of the pay-to-play system
--labor unions decimated by Reagan junta; almost all labor union upper-mucks now 'players'
--erosion (almost disappearance) of Dem party principles: pro-workers, pro-poor, etc.
--in general, the simply gargantuan power of Wall Street, banksters, transglobal corps, MIC privateers, consolidated Corp media, et al, and foreign influences (the Saudis, other $$ investors)

--the frontload of rightwing states in the primaries (handed Clinton a winning 'narrative'--in truth a hollow one--going into the swing states; Sanders early wins and ties--a remarkable showing--swamped when Dixiecrats hit the Corporate airwaves).

And one self-imposed handicap: no superpacs, no Corp or billionaire money (This handicap is the core of the Sanders campaign, but it is nevertheless a handicap for operating in this atmosphere--for one thing, it doubles-down the determination of all of the above to kill Sanders' ideas and stop his campaign).

Personally, I would add this handicap: The privatized vote counting system (since 2004), with 'TRADE SECRET' code in all of our voting systems, nationwide, owned and controlled by a handful of private corporations (the biggest one, ES&S/Diebold with far rightwing connections) and no auditing in half the states and inadequate auditing in the other half. Who knows what they are doing? They, do, in fact, have the ability--the easy ability--to rig elections, and have probably done so (Bush '04, Congress, governors, state leg's).

Conclusion: It is utterly amazing how well this campaign of ideas, led by the most principled and honest politician in the USA--and the best Democrat!--has done so far. Sanders is, in fact, still in the running as to the 'horse race' due to his incredible energy, the power of his ideas and the millions of people who have supported him as volunteers, donors and internet news activists. He has run a brilliant campaign and so have we. This campaign had NO chance six months ago. Now it has a chance, as to the 'horse race,' with March 15 behind us, and blue skies ahead.

But we need to be aware--very aware--of the handicaps we are operating under. They will probably intensify. I'm a Californian and, believe me, our state party is now a Corporate Democratic Party like all the rest. And that includes Gov. Jerry Brown. We are a socially liberal state but our Establishment is as bad as any of them on the most important matters: income inequality and filthy campaign $$ (and all its ills--lobbying, revolving door, rule by the uber-rich, etc.). I'm not saying Sanders can't win here--I think he can--but it won't be an easy ride.

ONE MORE TIME: This is a campaign of IDEAS, not a 'horse race'--or not only a 'horse race.' That is why Sanders is in it to the Convention, and, as to ideas, beyond the Convention. He has sparked a revolution--and we have sparked a revolution--that has the power to transform the Democratic Party into the party of the people once again, and to transform our country back into a democracy, which it has not been for some time now. We have only the vestiges of a hollowed out, rigged, and now Corporate-run democratic system to work with. Consider this to be the FIRST massive effort to change it from within. An amazing accomplishment, truly. And remember...SEABISCUIT! (Americans love an underdog!)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's nice. Which states do you predict Sanders will lose and what margins will Sanders need Renew Deal Mar 2016 #1
just checked a few polls - winning big in ND, SD, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana DrDan Mar 2016 #7
There are Democrats in ND, SD, Wyoming, Idaho and Montana? Stallion Mar 2016 #19
Talk about red states. The reddest of the red. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #20
exactly - big wins there will do nothing to offset one loss (or tie) in NY, CA, or PA DrDan Mar 2016 #25
Oh, really. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #2
324 delegates is virtually impossible to make up. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #3
I don't disagree. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #10
Looking over the numbers, I'm again confident in Bernie's chances to win this. Gregorian Mar 2016 #4
I too am confident Jenny_92808 Mar 2016 #23
Thirty States left, liberalmike27 Mar 2016 #5
Is California winner take all? n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #9
Not for Democrats Renew Deal Mar 2016 #11
No Capt. Obvious Mar 2016 #12
No. As has been pointed out dozens of times... Garrett78 Mar 2016 #14
I didn't think so, it was question to a post by the OP. n/t Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #15
I know. And the OP is wrong on many counts. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #17
I didn't think any Democratic primaries are winner-take-all. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #13
Proportional NCTraveler Mar 2016 #18
With what you just said... NCTraveler Mar 2016 #16
No . . . Califoria is NOT winner-takes-all. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #24
If you want to stare at a chart for a bit liberalmike27 Mar 2016 #6
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #8
K N R-ed Faux pas Mar 2016 #21
Yes, he's collecting lots of delegates and four months is an eternity in politics. pa28 Mar 2016 #22
BS would have to win 70% of the remaining states completely..... Historic NY Mar 2016 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Mudcat Mar 2016 #27
That's incorrect. They're only split by approx. 300 delegates. Gregorian Mar 2016 #28
Actually, only 24 states, DC and three territories have not voted. LonePirate Mar 2016 #29
"truth is, last night wasn't too bad" --I totally agree. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Won Delegates Clinton 111...»Reply #30