Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hillary's Winning the 13-State-Bible-Belt. Sanders is Still Winning the 37-State-Not-The-Bible-Belt! [View all]
This nomination race is basically where you would expect it to be if you were looking for Sanders to win a come-from-behind upset over Hillary, the DNC chosen establishment Goliath who is running to keep the status quo in place.
There are several key points to keep in mind.
1. First, if you were thinking that Sanders was the favorite, and not the underdog, and this would be an easy waltz to the nomination, that was never a realistic expectation. If you thought that a Jewish progressive candidate from New York via Vermont was going to win in the Bible Belt over the centrist former first lady of Arkansas, that was also never going to happen. But keep in mind, Dixie is 13 states and the rest of America is 37 states; I'd rather be winning in the 37 state region than in the 13 state region.
2. Second, leave aside the Bible Belt for a moment, and look at how well "underdog" Sanders is doing in the rest of the nation:
State.....Hillary Delegates.....Sanders Delegates
IA.....................23....................21
NH....................9.....................15
NV....................19....................15
CO....................28....................38
MA....................46....................45
MN....................29....................46
OK....................17....................21
VT.....................0.....................16
NE....................10....................14
KS....................10....................23
ME....................7.....................15
MI.....................60....................67
IL......................68....................67
MO....................32....................32
OH....................76....................57
Total................434...................492 out of 926
Considering the 15 contests outside of the Bible Belt, Missouri was a tie and Sanders won the most pledged delegates in 9 out of 15 states! Sanders won most of these states convincingly, and lifted the voters to achieve record turnout in most of these wins.
Hillary only won a majority of pledged delegates in only 5 out of these 15 states, and her wins in Iowa and Massachusetts and Illinois were by incredibly narrow margins (by only one delegate in Massachusetts and Illinois, and by 2 in Iowa).
Sanders has won over 53% of these delegates!
If the West Coast states were front-loaded in the nomination calendar instead of the Bible Belt, the establishment politicians at the DNC would already be updating their resumes and the M$M would be pulling its hair out.
3. Third, the goal is to amass a majority of pledged delegates going onto the convention. Do not fall for the nonsense about super-delegates who do not vote until the convention and who historically flip to back whichever candidate is leading in the voter-assigned pledged delegate count and do not but into Hillary's campaign's misleading posts about the "popular vote" which is not a real count of the popular vote (just ask what was the popular vote in Iowa, for example, and why Hillary and her allies in Iowa are opposing any release of those figures).
There are 4050 pledged delegates to be allocated, and 2108 remain to be assigned by the voters in the upcoming contests. That means we are less than halfway through the process. For Sanders to achieve 2026 pledged delegates (a majority) he needs 1215 (about 57%). To put that in context, Sanders meets this target if he does about as well as he did in Nebraska, and he meets this target even if he does less well than he did in Kansas, Colorado, Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. Sanders does not even have to do as well in the remaining part of the race as Hillary did in the first part, and he can still win.
With these goals in mind, we need to focus like lasers on the next 9 contests:
Democrats Abroad (we are well ahead)
Idaho (we are ahead in the most recent poll)
Utah (we have been ahead in earlier polling and Sanders is way ahead in the betting markets)
Arizona (this is a close race to watch; if we get the turnout up, we probably win)
Alaska (we are ahead in the most recent polling)
Hawaii (I'm not aware of any polling, but Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has our back and I like our chances)
Washington (I'm not aware of recent polling, but word on the ground is that we are ahead)
Wisconsin (we are ahead in the most recent polling)
Wyoming (I'm not aware of recent polling, but word on the ground is that we are ahead)
Sanders is already winning the Not-The-Bible-Belt primary 9 wins to 5, and after then next 9 contests, Sanders could easily be ahead 18 to 5!
We have passed through the part of the calendar rigged to favor the type of centrist candidates who will perform best in the Bible Belt, and the best half (more than half, really) remains to be contested. Sanders has taken Hillary's best punch, and he's still standing!
Keep donating! Keep phone banking! Keep the hope burning!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
135 replies, 10615 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (74)
ReplyReply to this post
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary's Winning the 13-State-Bible-Belt. Sanders is Still Winning the 37-State-Not-The-Bible-Belt! [View all]
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
OP
Thanks for noticing that. I am pleased to have done better than Nate Silver this cycle.
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#10
But to say she is struggling in swing states when she is winning them vs Bernie
Godhumor
Mar 2016
#50
You sure you want to lean on anywhere but the South ? Nevada was a squeak .
orpupilofnature57
Mar 2016
#101
Who's ignoring Texas and Florida? Go ahead, take your victory lap! Hillary swept the Bible Belt.
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#13
I hope we treat Democrats everywhere similarly. It is not their fault if they live in the 'wrong'
pampango
Mar 2016
#8
Sanders did not skip any contests. He fought hard, but Hillary won the Bible Belt. Congratulations!
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#15
In Illinois and Michigan combined, he won 134 pledged delegates and she won 128. Hillary won the
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#92
This is not like the general election where you win states for electoral college votes.
upaloopa
Mar 2016
#34
They aren't "second class" votes. They are votes from a region that favored Hillary and is now done
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#36
You realize that several states have not reported any vote total, right? If you are so sure
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#99
"almost all African American"? That is simply not true and easily disproved. The Bible Belt is the
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#40
Any state that Clinton wins or ties in the rest of the way raises the bar for Sanders
onenote
Mar 2016
#39
No one disputes that Sanders is the underdog. No one is saying it is an easy task. But when Sanders
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#41
Well of course if we cut away the large number of states Bernie lost badly in, he'd be ahead.
CalvinballPro
Mar 2016
#47
I'm not privy to Sanders' campaign plans, but no one is "cutting away" states. If the Bible Belt did
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#53
He needs 58% today. He needed 54% yesterday. Every contest he loses compounds the necessary #
CalvinballPro
Mar 2016
#57
That's incorrect for a couple of reasons. First, not all states report a "popular vote" and delegate
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#70
Hillary just won a southern state, a mid-Atlantic state, 2 rust belt states and a Midwest state
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#51
Missouri was a tie. Hillary won her HOME STATE by one delegate. She won Ohio (congratulations). And
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#56
You say "Sanders lost Missouri," but last I saw the delegates were split evenly. How did you think
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#80
So you have an O'Malley icon and you are questioning Sanders' strategy. I like O'Malley but I would
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#93
Yes, I have an O'Malley avatar, and yes, I'm questioning Sanders' strategy.
NuclearDem
Mar 2016
#102
I understand that you feel that way, but others have a different view:
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#95
This treats all past contests as water under the bridge and projects how Sanders has to perform in
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#59
I'll assume that you didn't read the OP before responding (which is OK, I'm just glad for the kick)
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#73
Given the OP's track record, I can comfortably say that it is, in fact, spin.
NuclearDem
Mar 2016
#114
Typically, we don't decide who's the winner and who's the loser before halftime.
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#98
I was a swimmer. We had heats. Had winners and losers. The winners advance. Losers go away.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#107
Definitely. Not only is it far from other, neither of our candidates should want it to be over. Do
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#116
Denying reality and promoting false memes is neither healthy nor productive.
Garrett78
Mar 2016
#119