Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 02:59 PM Mar 2016

A Hillary Supporter says Hillary’s Email Defense Is Laughable [View all]

We now have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton being revealed as someone who took the unprecedented step of arranging to use her personal email account for all of her official email communications. What’s more, she decided to use her own email server equipment, rather than a commercial Internet service provider, so that the records of her email account would reside solely within her personal control at home. And if that were not enough, she then proceeded blithely—though not uncharacteristically—to present herself to the public, at a press conference held on March 10, as if there were really nothing “wrong” about any of this at all.

Well, as the saying goes, “reality is not her friend.”

For anyone considering this sad tale carefully—including the media, members of Congress and the public at large, whether from “inside the Beltway” or not—some basic points of both law and reality should be borne in mind.

First, while it is accurate for Secretary Clinton to say that when she was in office there was not a flat, categorical prohibition on federal government officials ever using their personal email accounts for the conduct of official business, that’s a far different thing from saying (as she apparently would like to) that a government official could use his or her personal email account exclusively, for all official email communications, as she actually did. In fact, the Federal Records Act dictates otherwise.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/hillary-clinton-email-scandal-defense-laughable-foia-116116

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Indictment Fairy cannot save you Tarc Mar 2016 #1
Pathetic response. The person who authored the piece teaches secrecy law at American University’s snagglepuss Mar 2016 #8
So that would be... argumentum ad verecundiam? Tarc Mar 2016 #11
Ah, so he is not some whimsical entity come to life Babel_17 Mar 2016 #14
Exactly Depaysement Mar 2016 #16
About time there was an image for this!! JoePhilly Mar 2016 #9
Lol, guess the talking point of the day has been released. giftedgirl77 Mar 2016 #2
it's all they have nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #4
It's really sad when they have to lift shit from Beitbart & Redstate. giftedgirl77 Mar 2016 #5
the Indictment Fairy doesn't reply to year old Politico stories nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #3
Pathetic response. The person who authored the piece teaches secrecy law at American University’s snagglepuss Mar 2016 #6
no what's pathetic is people who claim to be Democrats flogging the stupid email story geek tragedy Mar 2016 #12
She had assistant remove security markings and then emailed them to Blumenthal who snagglepuss Mar 2016 #15
It was "Allowed". Let the parsing begin. Clintonspeak: Deception and dishonesty first, FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #7
This needs to be kept out of the political realm speaktruthtopower Mar 2016 #10
Edit: Wrong thread, lol Babel_17 Mar 2016 #13
Sigh. Only 9 posters so far on this thread, and FOUR of them should still be on timeout. kath Mar 2016 #17
Good lord. She really does think she can do anything she wants. Much like Trump. Avalux Mar 2016 #18
Good piece, but it's a year old. thesquanderer Mar 2016 #19
I want to know about Pastiche423 Mar 2016 #20
Do.Not.Care. cynatnite Mar 2016 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A Hillary Supporter says ...»Reply #0