Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Like it or Not, Hillary Clinton is Being More Honest with Voters Than Bernie Sanders [View all]choie
(6,909 posts)2. That's a joke
Clinton lies constantly. Since Bernie entered the race she's been stealing his policies, but you can be damn sure that if she becomes president she will do an about face.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Like it or Not, Hillary Clinton is Being More Honest with Voters Than Bernie Sanders [View all]
fun n serious
Mar 2016
OP
How can Hillary Clinton be honest with voters when she refuses basic transparency requests?
JonLeibowitz
Mar 2016
#3
Just once I would like to hear Sanders level with the college students he speaks to
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#4
Does he mention that the Republicans have gerrymandered so many safe districts that they
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#8
The Republicans intend to keep Congress paralyzed be it Hillary or Sanders.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#21
I am shocked he has not raised funds for down ticket Democrats if he is saying
Thinkingabout
Mar 2016
#9
Do you really believe the candidates doesn't need funds? Sanders must not believe this,
Thinkingabout
Mar 2016
#16
That down ticket focus is a major difference between the BS and HRC campaigns.
PeaceNikki
Mar 2016
#24
I fail to see how that is relevant. If the numbers don't exist in Congress to pass it,
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#25
The reasons are irrelevant. The current numbers in Congress are all that's relevant IMO.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#45
The reasons are extremely relevant...Unless you want to keep repeating the same mistakes
Armstead
Mar 2016
#48
Not to the immediate prospects for legislation their not. We were talking short term here.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#51
We're always talking short term -- If the Dems had rolled the dice years ago....
Armstead
Mar 2016
#53
I agree, but a sitting president must operate in the now if he/she wishes to get anything done.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#64
Whereas, Hillary finds oodles of common ground to collaborate with the Republicans.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#17
Like fracking? only in certain areas of the country..and they have to disclose what chemicals they
insta8er
Mar 2016
#41
Climate change is upon us. Hillary offers weak and pathetic proposals. A lie
riderinthestorm
Mar 2016
#18
Garland is not a conservative. He's a moderate replacing a far Right Justice.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#38
Republicans have a 54-46 edge in the Senate. They will not confirm a liberal to replace Scalia.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#50
Then, by all means, wish for a liberal Justice to replace Scalia given the Republicans 54-46
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#56
Hillary cheersquad reminds me of Faux News viewers...this is one of those instances
insta8er
Mar 2016
#27
The higher you aim, the further you get -- even if it can't be all the way. And conversely...
Armstead
Mar 2016
#32
It's easy and convenient to use Republicans as an excuse for not even trying. n/t
Avalux
Mar 2016
#35
The new Democratic mantra -- "Life is a cosmic void. Abandon all hope but elect us."
Armstead
Mar 2016
#46
Like entitlement , embellishing and detracting from the Truth to win at any cost ?
orpupilofnature57
Mar 2016
#52
So you think it is honest to say Ron and Nancy were heroes of the AIDS crisis?
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#79