Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: So why did SoS Clinton have a system set up outside [View all]AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)103. the nightmare scenario
What disturbs me the most is that there really is no solid foundation for ruling out the possibility that she was selling state secrets and getting paid through the Clinton Foundation. A server compromised in a known way as a means of providing access would be an effective method of creating plausible deniability.
Whatever it is, there's something that is seen as heavy enough to grant the server admin immunity to talk about. I just don't see that happening absent a substantial crime.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
143 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Except Clinton didn't hurt anyone. I get the email deal is your last desperate hope
Hoyt
Mar 2016
#21
Look man, I'm tired of this junk with you guys. I'm not talking about friggin drunk drivers,
Hoyt
Mar 2016
#54
The biggest problem facing the country today is more people believe it's nothing
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2016
#83
Like you aren't using "talking points." Even your candidate says the email deal is BS.
Hoyt
Mar 2016
#117
Nadin, it's only serious in Sanders' and Trumps' supporters minds. Glad to know you are more astute
Hoyt
Mar 2016
#122
"Suspicions" -- LMAO, from whom? Even Sanders said the email issue is BS. Saw him right there on TV
Hoyt
Mar 2016
#120
the idiots at NSA, and at least a couple of the the Inspector Generals
nadinbrzezinski
Mar 2016
#121
We'll know soon enough. Of course, when she is not indicted or anything else, you will rack it up
Hoyt
Mar 2016
#123
Given they extended this from December, when it was supposed to be done
nadinbrzezinski
Mar 2016
#126
Sanders will continue to chip away at Hillary's shaky support, regardless of the damned e-mails.
reformist2
Mar 2016
#49
To keep the All-Powerful DU too busy arguing among ourselves to avoid the oncoming Fascist takeover.
randome
Mar 2016
#4
The Clintons practically live the mantra of "It seemed like a good idea at the time..."
Hydra
Mar 2016
#33
+10 million! So obvious along with her pay to play going on with the Foundation nt
riderinthestorm
Mar 2016
#43
Just as Bill answered in 2004 about Lewinsky when he did book tours, "because she could"
karynnj
Mar 2016
#14
Why are Democrats propagating a Republican invented scandal against a Democrat?
GreydeeThos
Mar 2016
#15
The origin of the email controversy is the Republicans in the House of Representatives
GreydeeThos
Mar 2016
#29
And the origin of discovering the stained blue dress was Hillary's desire to withhold information.
frylock
Mar 2016
#63
So did the VRWC use mind control to get Bill to not have sexual relations with that woman?
frylock
Mar 2016
#78
The common denominator is Hillary and her inability to comply with simple requests.
frylock
Mar 2016
#87
The FBI isn't investigating Clinton they're investigating the SoS serverS, this is so beneeth folk
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#138
You're promoting a RW agenda insisting that Clinton conform to a standard of conduct
baldguy
Mar 2016
#139
Where are the transcripts of Powell being grilled by a Congressional committee for 11 hours?
baldguy
Mar 2016
#143
Initially, because the NSA said she could not have a secure Blackberry like POTUS
KeepItReal
Mar 2016
#25
You would allow hackers to get into your private server and view national secrets?
Fawke Em
Mar 2016
#81
Any IT professional knows that a system can be hacked and log entries wouldn't show it. nt
DemocracyDirect
Mar 2016
#131
She could always have a Blackberry. Rice had a blackberry. She was always allowed
Recursion
Mar 2016
#32
Did you ever move from one job to another that meant you needed to change your technology?
karynnj
Mar 2016
#44
However, shouldn't her response have been to demand more changes in the SD system?
karynnj
Mar 2016
#46
The email bullshit is nothing but political. It's RW propaganda designed solely to attack a Democrat
baldguy
Mar 2016
#47
Apparently, the road to the Presidency is paved with "He/She did it first!"
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2016
#39
The server was set up so that FoIA requests would return the answer, 'We have no records'.
w4rma
Mar 2016
#56
Because she and people like her, thin they are above the rules that apply to everyone else.
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#69
It was a deliberate effort to frustrate the Freedom of Information Act.
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#70
I can answer this. It was to be able to make business deals with and for wealthy private interests
Zorra
Mar 2016
#72
Paganini was not offered immunity for a day in the park. He was her IT guy.
libdem4life
Mar 2016
#89