Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
22. And a lack of ballots
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 10:25 PM
Mar 2016

I care not who you wish to vote for, but denying people the ability to vote over lack of ballots, which has happened in more states and various precincts that can be counted - that is fraud.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If the nom depended on crowd sizes Sanders would've won months ago no doubt. But it doesn't and uponit7771 Mar 2016 #1
You Hillary supporters really think that a candidate who gets 30,000 people at his rallies bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #3
Oh he's getting them out to vote maybe but HRC has more voters. "rigged" sounds like GOP voter uponit7771 Mar 2016 #6
It seems sanders' rallies are about 'bread and circus'. IE, spectacle KittyWampus Mar 2016 #24
A great opportunity for a cheap date. oasis Mar 2016 #74
Yeah, you can go with a date, have a spectacle going on in an arena AND keep your iphone KittyWampus Mar 2016 #78
It's not like the'd be hearing anything new. oasis Mar 2016 #83
This Bernie supporter says that you are posting hogwash. nt longship Mar 2016 #20
So the dem nod does depend on crowd sizes? Really? uponit7771 Mar 2016 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author lunamagica Mar 2016 #34
Romney rally in Ohio, just before the election. You think PBO "Rigged" it? lunamagica Mar 2016 #35
How many people does Hillary Clinton pack in? Seeinghope Mar 2016 #42
1147 - 830 - that is all that matters DrDan Mar 2016 #82
And Romney was the GOP nominee at the time, too... Fawke Em Mar 2016 #80
Spin, spin, spin! longship Mar 2016 #16
So the dem nod does depend on crowd sizes? Really? uponit7771 Mar 2016 #25
Crowds at the polls, my good friend. longship Mar 2016 #31
You are right - Bernie is getting the majority of Independents Samantha Mar 2016 #50
That's why I think there's fraud going on with the vote counting ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #23
and voter fraud too right??! I mean when your candidate loses its not because the other guys have uponit7771 Mar 2016 #27
God damn mother fucking right there is fraud ... ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #75
Romney supporters pack rally in West Chester, Ohio; Crowd estimate: 30,000 lunamagica Mar 2016 #41
adds up to 1147-830 DrDan Mar 2016 #84
Right. Hillary is delighted that she can't draw large enthusiastic crowds to her meetings. imagine2015 Mar 2016 #36
Hillary doesn't spend a lot of time taking her campaign to the 99%. She's LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #76
Billy boy on his way to Tucson........ bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #2
Tucson is protected from Clinton's idiocy Dynamite Dave Mar 2016 #5
media silent, as usual: amborin Mar 2016 #4
Cause he's losing and crowd sizes don't win delegates? tia uponit7771 Mar 2016 #7
Even people here sharing their rally experiences keep saying how many they've gone to. synergie Mar 2016 #10
Didn't think about that, he has his groupies too... uponit7771 Mar 2016 #14
and haters. Qutzupalotl Mar 2016 #28
Um, actually, that's a trait that BS supporters own. Hating the other candidate is what synergie Mar 2016 #65
"I know you are, but what am I?" Qutzupalotl Mar 2016 #68
So it isn't Berniebros it's Sanders Fan Bois? KittyWampus Mar 2016 #30
no, tio; even after he won 4 out of 7 primaries, there was total media silence; amborin Mar 2016 #51
Great pic. vintx Mar 2016 #63
Yup, Bernie has a lot of groupies who attend his rallies. They seem like fun and not synergie Mar 2016 #8
Yes, people follow him from venue to venue, in hopes that he'll maybe play St. Stephen or Dark Star. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #11
Yes, several of you have posted about how many venues you've been to. Did you forget? synergie Mar 2016 #67
several of me? Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #77
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #13
Well all of that is still not helping Sanders, why doesn't he stop? uponit7771 Mar 2016 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #29
why do you want to deprive me and millions of my right to vote? for the eventual candidate, at that amborin Mar 2016 #52
Tons of groupies...boy the planes must be getting YUUUUGGGEEE profits for thousands of people bkkyosemite Mar 2016 #32
Didn't Jesus have followers? Wasn't his message simple? Be careful leaders have follers Seeinghope Mar 2016 #39
Doesn't the campaign finance buses to get people from palce to place? synergie Mar 2016 #66
Wait til Saturday. We are caucusing. nt artislife Mar 2016 #70
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #9
Well of course not. If it wasn't for Bill Clinton Hillary Clinton wouldn't be viable. Seeinghope Mar 2016 #38
There is so much truth in this. nt artislife Mar 2016 #72
If there are no ballots, you can't vote. n/t Aerows Mar 2016 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #15
This is an example of preventing US citizens from voting. Aerows Mar 2016 #19
It is a caucus so there are no voting machines used. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #18
And a lack of ballots Aerows Mar 2016 #22
Well said! hrmjustin Mar 2016 #26
K & R AzDar Mar 2016 #33
Romney supporters pack rally in West Chester, Ohio; Crowd estimate: 30,000 (just before the GE) lunamagica Mar 2016 #37
Where is the picture of Hillary Clinton with thousands and thousands of people? Seeinghope Mar 2016 #40
Irrelevant. I only posted this because of the suggestion that the election is "rigged" lunamagica Mar 2016 #44
Votes that are are not being truthfully reported counted. Remember 2000 Nd 04' Seeinghope Mar 2016 #79
See post #44 lunamagica Mar 2016 #45
And waiting in line for hours udbcrzy2 Mar 2016 #43
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #46
During a primary? n/t udbcrzy2 Mar 2016 #47
LOL, talk about grasping at straws. lunamagica Mar 2016 #48
Seems odd that she can't get anyone to physically come out for her udbcrzy2 Mar 2016 #49
No, not fishy at all. The pollong has been consistent with her winning lunamagica Mar 2016 #54
Are you sure udbcrzy2 Mar 2016 #55
I'm I sure of what? That she is winning? Yes, I am. "Running at the right of Trump". That is so lunamagica Mar 2016 #60
Okay, stop reading udbcrzy2 Mar 2016 #61
OK, I apologize. It's that whenever someone says that she's at the right of Trump, lunamagica Mar 2016 #62
And in comparison to Obama's rallies Romneys jillan Mar 2016 #56
Tens of thousands of deluded Americans! RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #53
I thought this was the Hillary group? nolabels Mar 2016 #57
Not yet. But some are attempting to "evolve" it. n/t RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #58
I got fourteen years posting on these boards and I'll be dammed if ya'll think im goin to sit back.. nolabels Mar 2016 #59
I fully expect Sanders to win WA MFM008 Mar 2016 #64
Bet your family was sad when Dino Rossi lost, too. nt artislife Mar 2016 #73
I was there werknotgoin2takeit Mar 2016 #69
Too busy today to go.. artislife Mar 2016 #71
This thread is full of LOLz firebrand80 Mar 2016 #81
Yep.nt sufrommich Mar 2016 #85
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»20,000 a 30,000 at Bernie...»Reply #22