2016 Postmortem

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)

16. Lol

Mon Mar 21, 2016, 07:52 PM

Mar 2016

"Blumenthal, a longtime Clinton confidant, joined the foundation's payroll in 2009 and was switched to a similar contract without benefits in 2013. That contracted ended in March of that year."

What was the time frame of Clinton’s tenure at the State Dept again?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Email from Blumenthal to HRC, Concerning Toppling Assad [View all] amborin Mar 2016 OP

So ? The Secretary of State cannot seek advice ? Nothing to see here...move along. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #1

Obama TOLD her NOT to consult with Blumunthal Politicalboi Mar 2016 #2

Or if Bill does it as well NWCorona Mar 2016 #4

But Hillary and Obama UglyGreed Mar 2016 #6

The President told her NO SUCH THING. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author 840high Mar 2016 #29

not true grasswire Mar 2016 #30

are you busting trust or trusting of the bustering? snooper2 Mar 2016 #66

How was forwarding an email, "undermining the president, and since when do BS supporters synergie Mar 2016 #37

This might come as a suprirse to you nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #39

She could be the first POTUS denied a security clearance. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #44

If this does not blow before nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #45

She did it to avoid FOIA actions,... HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #50

We hope to get closure by May though nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #54

We may get a decision, but it won't be closure. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #55

Yup, it won't be pretty nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #56

Well, those of us who care about national security understand that this is a right wing synergie Mar 2016 #63

Alas this is not a fishing expedition nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #64

I think you miss the point. revbones Mar 2016 #53

The point being that BSers are trying to pick up where the GOP left off after trying very hard synergie Mar 2016 #58

So the DOJ is part of the Sanders campaign nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #65

Oh my... her foreign policy experience is one giant mess of entitled blundering. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #59

She was given a direct order from Obama not to utilize Sid NWCorona Mar 2016 #3

Wrong. He was not to be hired at State. Get your facts straight. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #13

So she hired him outside of the state to the tune of $10k per month NWCorona Mar 2016 #14

No, you don't have your facts straight. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #15

Lol NWCorona Mar 2016 #16

Doesn't matter. He wasn't on the government payroll. In the private sector, Trust Buster Mar 2016 #20

Ok NWCorona Mar 2016 #21

Knowing the facts always makes me feel better. Thanks for the sentiment. Good day. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #22

And a good day to you as well NWCorona Mar 2016 #23

Well the facts of those dates... pantsonfire Mar 2016 #49

If you have your facts straight, why are you making such patently false claims? Just for fun then? synergie Mar 2016 #38

Ergo, I know this is hard to undersgand, he was a civilian with NO SECURITY CLEARANCE nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #40

So why then did Hillary ask to have identifiers removed NWCorona Mar 2016 #42

it was more than that; he was banned from the WH and from State Dept business amborin Mar 2016 #46

Direct orders from PUTUS to the SoS mean nothing to you nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #5

They should mean Clinton is unqualified to be president. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #60

The 'Positive Side' to civil war in Syria? Are you effing kidding me? Dangerous people in positions Land of Enchantment Mar 2016 #7

Sad, isn't it? H2O Man Mar 2016 #52

Completely sad. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #61

Break out the indictments! Blumenthal sent an email. LonePirate Mar 2016 #8

she told him to keep them coming; she did not want to block them amborin Mar 2016 #9

If it was just one you would have a point nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #10

If the rest of the emails are like this one, then the pro-indictment crowd is going be very unhappy. LonePirate Mar 2016 #17

You go speak to NSA ok nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #19

I guess that makes me a bad Democrat by waiting for evidence before convicting someone! LonePirate Mar 2016 #25

I have not convincted anybody nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #27

When did I say the investigation was pointless and it should cease? LonePirate Mar 2016 #31

The email you are mocking is part of the evidence nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #34

That email in the OP deserves to be mocked. There is nothing criminal in it. LonePirate Mar 2016 #41

Except when it was sent it was marked confidential nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #43

out of curiosity, amborin Mar 2016 #47

No. I voted for Bernie. I simply see through people using this as a Hail Mary to advance their cause LonePirate Mar 2016 #51

this is where you are incorrect about some of us, LonePirate dana_b Mar 2016 #67

yes grasswire Mar 2016 #35

Exactly. Perhaps if the breathless hysteria was about something that was, ya, know, synergie Mar 2016 #33

you completely missed the point of that other OP amborin Mar 2016 #48

Her buds are icky. n/t Wilms Mar 2016 #11

So. There's a positive side to civil war in Syria? Octafish Mar 2016 #18

Big Fat Lucrative Military Contracts for Campaign Donors? farleftlib Mar 2016 #24

That's the pattern. Octafish Mar 2016 #26

her informants were ginning up deals for themselves in Libya. grasswire Mar 2016 #36

But but... the big picture! You are missing the big picture. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #62

Okay, and? She got an e-nail and sent in on, the impropriety is where now? synergie Mar 2016 #28

See #5 840high Mar 2016 #32

State Dept was funding the Syrian opposition at least 4 yrs before Arab Spring leveymg Mar 2016 #57