Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)REPORT: Legal Experts Side with Hillary Clinton on Use of Private Emails [View all]
Central to the email issue, as Hillary has repeatedly explained, is that certain emails which passed through her private server were retroactively classified as top secret. The retroactive classification is crucial, because it means she never knowingly mishandled top secret materials. Further:
The relatively few laws that govern the handling of classified materials were generally written to cover spies, leakers and those who illegally retain such information, such as at home. Though the view is not unanimous, several lawyers who specialize in this area said its a stretch to apply existing statutes to a former cabinet secretary whose communication of sensitive materials was with aides not a national enemy.
The fact that legal experts have agreed that it is very unlikely that Hillary will be indicted, and that existing law isnt designed to be (mis)applied to this situation, has largely gone uncovered by the national media.
The most likely explanation for that failure is because they want to continue to doggedly elevate this bureaucratic review into a criminal scandal, in order to take down the woman most likely to be the nations first female president.
The relatively few laws that govern the handling of classified materials were generally written to cover spies, leakers and those who illegally retain such information, such as at home. Though the view is not unanimous, several lawyers who specialize in this area said its a stretch to apply existing statutes to a former cabinet secretary whose communication of sensitive materials was with aides not a national enemy.
The fact that legal experts have agreed that it is very unlikely that Hillary will be indicted, and that existing law isnt designed to be (mis)applied to this situation, has largely gone uncovered by the national media.
The most likely explanation for that failure is because they want to continue to doggedly elevate this bureaucratic review into a criminal scandal, in order to take down the woman most likely to be the nations first female president.
http://bluenationreview.com/legal-experts-side-with-hillary-clinton-on-use-of-private-emails/
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
REPORT: Legal Experts Side with Hillary Clinton on Use of Private Emails [View all]
Cryptoad
Mar 2016
OP
BNR or the mishandling of classified info, or the corruption shown in the emails? nt
revbones
Mar 2016
#19
Is that like those "climate experts" who side with the oil companies on climate change?
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#13
Who are the legal experts? No names is the story!??? Hillary's defence team lawyers?
4139
Mar 2016
#14
You have to burrow down a few links, but the original article does name sources.
Lizzie Poppet
Mar 2016
#22
The State Dept did not have any regulation forbidding use of a private email server.
DCBob
Mar 2016
#79
They have to prove she did it willfully and knowingly or gross negligence to be a crime.
DCBob
Mar 2016
#49
Propaganda source run by RWer David Brock. No thanks. Hillary must be scared for Brock to be
berni_mccoy
Mar 2016
#44
Some people are going to be very unhappy if the Indictment Fairy doesn't visit them
Tarc
Mar 2016
#50