2016 Postmortem

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

26. There you are with your "implied" again as you interpret it how it works for you.

Reply to beam me up scottie (Reply #17)

Thu Mar 24, 2016, 07:32 PM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I've been accused of being a "Berniebro". Genitals have nothing to do with whom I support. [View all] Pryderi Mar 2016 OP

I watched the BernBros go after Warren right before Mass. I do not believe this. seabeyond Mar 2016 #1

And the 50's graphic and pearls says it all. seabeyond Mar 2016 #2

Beach-ha-ha! kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #31

Did you call me the B word? then laugh? seabeyond Mar 2016 #32

It that how you 'interpreted' it? polly7 Mar 2016 #40

This would be asking a question and giving the opportunity for an answer. I know civil discourse seabeyond Mar 2016 #41

I bet you do! polly7 Mar 2016 #44

That does not make sense, you might want to edit. Bonobo, BMUS and you. I am so outta here. Lol. seabeyond Mar 2016 #47

Sure it does. polly7 Mar 2016 #50

Is Susan Sarandon a "Berniebro"? Pryderi Mar 2016 #3

She is not clever at all, and that is sad that she feels it is clever to reduce women to body parts. seabeyond Mar 2016 #4

Oh. You mean like that sexist shit that Gloria Steinem was talking about? Pryderi Mar 2016 #5

Academically there was a point. A waste of time trying to have conversation with a misogynist Maher. seabeyond Mar 2016 #6

So her comment wasn't horribly sexist because of whom she was speaking to? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #17

There you are with your "implied" again as you interpret it how it works for you. seabeyond Mar 2016 #26

She had to apologize for her sexist statement so obviously it's not just *my* interpretation. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #29

Again, your interpretation that you work so hard making fact. You are funny. Done with you though. seabeyond Mar 2016 #34

It was interpreted that way by thousands of angry women, why do you think she apologized? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #43

If you have read the academics of Steinem's discussion on feminism, it would be clear to you. Done. seabeyond Mar 2016 #46

I have read Steinem and that makes her comments even more inexcusable. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #48

How ironic then that you just reduced her to "cleavage" Bonobo Mar 2016 #7

It was her conversation, it is not reducing her to shit. Not nearly as clever as you think. seabeyond Mar 2016 #10

Why did you say "her 67 year old cleavage" Bonobo Mar 2016 #15

"her 67 year old cleavage" That was the WHOLE point of the attack on her, and her calling seabeyond Mar 2016 #22

"Buddying with her bro's"? So you're saying she's not capable of independent thought? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #11

You said it. I did not say that. You did then answered yourself. seabeyond Mar 2016 #12

Actually you said it, you implied she was trying to please men. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #19

you can not say "you said it" then state "you implied". You just confirmed I did NOT say it. Lmao. seabeyond Mar 2016 #24

"Buddying with her bro's" wasn't saying that she was trying to please men? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #33

buddying is more hangin' don't you think? Or, you can interpret it to work for you, regardless. seabeyond Mar 2016 #36

What did it mean in this context? She wasn't "hanging" with any men when she said that. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #38

The OP is talking about BernieBro's. BernieBros started the who reducing women to parts. seabeyond Mar 2016 #42

But you said it about Susan, who was she hanging with? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #45

Jury results..... JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #59

Thanks, good jury! That's the third alert on me in an hour. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #60

I could be the lone juror... JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #61

Ha! I did not know smilies worked on jury posts. When I think of all the 2 fingered typing ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #67

+ 1000 sheshe2 Mar 2016 #16

The funny thing, is you are actually the sexist one and you are too brainwashed by your own BS... phleshdef Mar 2016 #66

Nailed it! nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #74

Its kind of sad you don't see the difference... basselope Mar 2016 #89

What is with the sexy pose? sheshe2 Mar 2016 #13

Shaming her sexuality? Wow. nt Bonobo Mar 2016 #18

What's wrong with her pose? She looks sexy and confidant. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #21

Sex sells? sheshe2 Mar 2016 #51

What is she selling? Sounds like slut shaming to me. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #52

Hokey Dokey sheshe2 Mar 2016 #55

Boy, that amnesty was such a great idea, eh? opiate69 Mar 2016 #62

Right? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #64

I just wish they'd done it before the hearts drive, or let us know they were planning it. polly7 Mar 2016 #73

A confident woman who doesn't think body parts need to be hidden away and who polly7 Mar 2016 #56

Couldn't agree with her more. Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #14

Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #20

Um, "Draft Warren" supporters are all Bernie supporters now Lorien Mar 2016 #25

How about the frenzy throwing Warren under the bus because she did not endorse before MA primary? seabeyond Mar 2016 #30

Which brings up the question - why is when Barack Obama ran for President, he didn't run on being jillan Mar 2016 #8

What else does madokie Mar 2016 #49

Join the rest of us, welcome to under the bus! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #9

My 25 yr old grandson was delighted to hear his 61 yr old gramma ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #68

He sounds like a real stinker! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #69

The term "BernieBro" is empty and despicable senz Mar 2016 #23

Agreed. But that and the faux feminist thing is all they have Lorien Mar 2016 #27

Faux feminist is right. polly7 Mar 2016 #35

I believe the word for that is misogyny. Prism Mar 2016 #78

I know, Prism. It's really odd to watch, isn't it? polly7 Mar 2016 #79

Denying women their agency has long been acceptable in some quarters Prism Mar 2016 #80

Exactly, and young women by the millions are seeing through this bull*. polly7 Mar 2016 #81

Excellent graphic, Lorien. senz Mar 2016 #37

It is a baseless smear that has the scumbag David Brock written all over it nt BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #28

Indeed it is. potone Mar 2016 #39

It is a critical part of the Clinton strategy FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #72

We have to ignore it and move on. senz Mar 2016 #84

I've put most of the dullards that use it on Ignore. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #76

I love my new DU - Ignore Edition -- still looking for strays SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2016 #85

Berniebros are cereal business Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #53

You know what you need for that? A prize! Maybe a poster: beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #54

AHA! Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #57

If you collect boxtops you can send them in for smokin BernieBro merchandise: beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #58

AND JUST WHERE DID YOU FIND MY PICTURE? Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #63

I Googled 'purple gingham' and poof! There you were! beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #65

LOL polly7 Mar 2016 #70

lol, somebody did a nice job with that Babel_17 Mar 2016 #87

While yet others have been accused of worshiping the oligarchy and 1%. LanternWaste Mar 2016 #71

I don't worship anything, except maybe the spirit of inquiry. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #91

Berniebros is a sexist term spread by Clinton supporters who CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #75

Yeah a more appropriate term would have been Bernie stans rather than bros. Even though bros seaglass Mar 2016 #77

How dare you. senz Mar 2016 #83

You have spent 9 months complaining about and sniping at Hillary supporters, clean your seaglass Mar 2016 #92

Who called whom racist and sexist? Who came up with "BernieBro?" Not us. senz Mar 2016 #93

A tech editor for The Atlantic - male - coined the phrase BernieBro. I'm not looking for any seaglass Mar 2016 #94

Well since it's a lie, the tech editor was doing the dirty work senz Mar 2016 #95

Just how is "bros" NOT a sexist term when it refers only to MALES? And WTF does "stans" mean? CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #86

Maybe was going for Berniestan, like some kind of a dictatorship? (nt) Babel_17 Mar 2016 #88

I don't doubt you (nt) Babel_17 Mar 2016 #82

More noises from the Hill Folk Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #90