Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
48. New Details Reveal Possible Voter Suppression in Illinois Primary
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:05 PM
Mar 2016

The next day, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, an ardent Hillary Clinton supporter who has introduced her at campaign rallies, filed an appeal in Illinois 4th District Appellate Court to prevent late voting. On March 23, the appellate court issued a stay on Judge Vahle’s injunction, meaning those voters won’t get a chance to cast ballots in this primary. Hillary Clinton won Illinois by roughly 35,000 votes, or a slim 1.8 percent margin, effectively splitting delegates with Sanders.

Bernie Sanders won in four of the six Illinois counties that had ballot shortages.

● In Champaign County, Sanders beat Clinton 20,581-10,542 — almost a two-to-one margin.
● Bernie Sanders beat Clinton in rural Effingham County 1,247-867.
● Sanders won by 3,391 votes in Madison County, a Democratic Party stronghold.
● Bernie Sanders won 10,365 votes to Clinton’s 9,255 votes in Sangamon County.

In a phone interview, Adams County State’s Attorney Jon Barnard said that had there been enough ballots available in those counties, the end result may have been a Sanders win, rather than a Clinton victory.

“I think it’s certainly possible,” Barnard told US Uncut. “The number of voters that were turned away was in the thousands. Sangamon and Madison are huge for Democrats.”

Because the Adams County Clerk must certify primary election results by March 29, Barnard said there isn’t enough time to appeal the case to the Illinois Supreme Court, effectively disenfranchising thousands of voters.

http://usuncut.com/politics/illinois-democratic-establishment-refuses-to-allow-late-voting-for-voters-turned-away-from-polls/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1570622

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Most were confederate states RobertEarl Mar 2016 #1
It is March 24, 2016 Tarc Mar 2016 #3
AA are the minority RobertEarl Mar 2016 #5
The Southern A-A vote was the key to her success Tarc Mar 2016 #6
No they are not RobertEarl Mar 2016 #9
African-Americans are not right-wing Tarc Mar 2016 #35
Word twister you are? RobertEarl Mar 2016 #40
They are both left candidates Tarc Mar 2016 #41
You don't know what left means RobertEarl Mar 2016 #43
2nd Place... Also known as 1st Loser! LuvLoogie Mar 2016 #52
In the southern states, African American voters were often the majority (AL, LA, SC, and GA). Zynx Mar 2016 #11
Prove it RobertEarl Mar 2016 #13
The exit polls showed it. As a percentage of the Dem electorate, they're often a majority. Zynx Mar 2016 #15
Turnout? RobertEarl Mar 2016 #19
You are being utterly ridiculous. In caucus states the percentage turnout is far punier. Zynx Mar 2016 #22
At least it is hope for the future RobertEarl Mar 2016 #32
Exit polls are not good statistics RobertEarl Mar 2016 #36
I Think You Just Did! Stallion Mar 2016 #18
Turnout ? RobertEarl Mar 2016 #21
Honestly, you are debating like a Republican. Ignoring every fact that is inconvenient. Zynx Mar 2016 #23
What's wrong with you? RobertEarl Mar 2016 #29
Not in the Democratic Primary... brooklynite Mar 2016 #33
When was the last time most of those states went D in the general election? hobbit709 Mar 2016 #25
When was the last time Utah and Idaho went D in the general election? Tarc Mar 2016 #34
That wasn't your original question. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #37
You pump up Sanders' red state wins, and dismiss Hillary's red state wins Tarc Mar 2016 #38
hypocrisy is HRC defined. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #39
Yes, they do. And that is (part of) why they lost. DanTex Mar 2016 #50
Harder to rig a caucus. dogman Mar 2016 #2
Bingo! valerief Mar 2016 #4
Thats not what you guys were saying after Iowa and Nevada. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #8
I didn't say couldn't. dogman Mar 2016 #16
Just a tip: Your preferred candidate losing doesn't constitute fraud or rigging. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #20
There is nothing more democratic than a caucus. dogman Mar 2016 #45
Oh for the love of God. Is there any evidence the primaries were "rigged"? Zynx Mar 2016 #12
There are mounds of evidence that the Arizona primary was rigged. (nt) w4rma Mar 2016 #42
Sanders supporters whining on the internet is not the same thing is a evidence. iandhr Mar 2016 #44
New Details Reveal Possible Voter Suppression in Illinois Primary w4rma Mar 2016 #48
Do you have a reputable news sources.? iandhr Mar 2016 #49
Don't attack the messenger. The facts compiled in the article are independently verifiable. (nt) w4rma Mar 2016 #54
But much easier to disenfranchise voters, deny a secret ballot and discourage participation. tritsofme Mar 2016 #14
Actually, that isn't true KingFlorez Mar 2016 #28
If the people running them are untrustwothy. dogman Mar 2016 #47
"Fun Fact" ...LOL! Bill USA Mar 2016 #7
New script versus old script CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #10
Ya know, even before the primary Hillary had super delegates under her thumb. peace13 Mar 2016 #53
There's your proof it is all about name recognition. snowy owl Mar 2016 #17
Are they? I'll give you that they're more excited and committed, but I dare say that doesn't mean Zynx Mar 2016 #24
Indeed. The Dunning-Kruger effect is a very real phenomenon... NuclearDem Mar 2016 #26
Irrelevant link snowy owl Mar 2016 #56
when machines count hillary wins - when people show up and count sanders wins SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2016 #27
I love how so many of the Bernie fans are becoming conspiracy nuts - OhZone Mar 2016 #30
Got a link to that prediction? revbones Mar 2016 #31
Yeah, found a couple - OhZone Mar 2016 #51
That is NOT a fun fact calguy Mar 2016 #46
Yep. And the same folks screaming the loudest about how horrible the DEMOCRATIC super delegates are Number23 Mar 2016 #55
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fun Fact: Clinton Beating...»Reply #48