Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I've been accused of being a "Berniebro". Genitals have nothing to do with whom I support. [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)69. He sounds like a real stinker!
My s/o likes to instigate trouble too, he's a real riot at family gatherings, loves to pit me against his religious right wing brothers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've been accused of being a "Berniebro". Genitals have nothing to do with whom I support. [View all]
Pryderi
Mar 2016
OP
I watched the BernBros go after Warren right before Mass. I do not believe this.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#1
This would be asking a question and giving the opportunity for an answer. I know civil discourse
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#41
That does not make sense, you might want to edit. Bonobo, BMUS and you. I am so outta here. Lol.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#47
She is not clever at all, and that is sad that she feels it is clever to reduce women to body parts.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#4
Academically there was a point. A waste of time trying to have conversation with a misogynist Maher.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#6
So her comment wasn't horribly sexist because of whom she was speaking to?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#17
There you are with your "implied" again as you interpret it how it works for you.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#26
She had to apologize for her sexist statement so obviously it's not just *my* interpretation.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#29
Again, your interpretation that you work so hard making fact. You are funny. Done with you though.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#34
It was interpreted that way by thousands of angry women, why do you think she apologized?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#43
If you have read the academics of Steinem's discussion on feminism, it would be clear to you. Done.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#46
I have read Steinem and that makes her comments even more inexcusable.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#48
It was her conversation, it is not reducing her to shit. Not nearly as clever as you think.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#10
"her 67 year old cleavage" That was the WHOLE point of the attack on her, and her calling
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#22
"Buddying with her bro's"? So you're saying she's not capable of independent thought?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#11
you can not say "you said it" then state "you implied". You just confirmed I did NOT say it. Lmao.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#24
"Buddying with her bro's" wasn't saying that she was trying to please men?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#33
buddying is more hangin' don't you think? Or, you can interpret it to work for you, regardless.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#36
What did it mean in this context? She wasn't "hanging" with any men when she said that.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#38
The OP is talking about BernieBro's. BernieBros started the who reducing women to parts.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#42
Ha! I did not know smilies worked on jury posts. When I think of all the 2 fingered typing ...
ebayfool
Mar 2016
#67
The funny thing, is you are actually the sexist one and you are too brainwashed by your own BS...
phleshdef
Mar 2016
#66
I just wish they'd done it before the hearts drive, or let us know they were planning it.
polly7
Mar 2016
#73
How about the frenzy throwing Warren under the bus because she did not endorse before MA primary?
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#30
Which brings up the question - why is when Barack Obama ran for President, he didn't run on being
jillan
Mar 2016
#8
It is a baseless smear that has the scumbag David Brock written all over it nt
BernieforPres2016
Mar 2016
#28
If you collect boxtops you can send them in for smokin BernieBro merchandise:
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#58
Yeah a more appropriate term would have been Bernie stans rather than bros. Even though bros
seaglass
Mar 2016
#77
You have spent 9 months complaining about and sniping at Hillary supporters, clean your
seaglass
Mar 2016
#92
A tech editor for The Atlantic - male - coined the phrase BernieBro. I'm not looking for any
seaglass
Mar 2016
#94
Just how is "bros" NOT a sexist term when it refers only to MALES? And WTF does "stans" mean?
CharlotteVale
Mar 2016
#86