Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I've been accused of being a "Berniebro". Genitals have nothing to do with whom I support. [View all]Prism
(5,815 posts)80. Denying women their agency has long been acceptable in some quarters
As long as it is done for the Greater Good.
Which is defined by whatever the immediate need happens to be at the moment.
Women don't really support Sanders. They just want men to like them!
A respect for a woman's own mind suddenly goes poof. Just like that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've been accused of being a "Berniebro". Genitals have nothing to do with whom I support. [View all]
Pryderi
Mar 2016
OP
I watched the BernBros go after Warren right before Mass. I do not believe this.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#1
This would be asking a question and giving the opportunity for an answer. I know civil discourse
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#41
That does not make sense, you might want to edit. Bonobo, BMUS and you. I am so outta here. Lol.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#47
She is not clever at all, and that is sad that she feels it is clever to reduce women to body parts.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#4
Academically there was a point. A waste of time trying to have conversation with a misogynist Maher.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#6
So her comment wasn't horribly sexist because of whom she was speaking to?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#17
There you are with your "implied" again as you interpret it how it works for you.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#26
She had to apologize for her sexist statement so obviously it's not just *my* interpretation.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#29
Again, your interpretation that you work so hard making fact. You are funny. Done with you though.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#34
It was interpreted that way by thousands of angry women, why do you think she apologized?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#43
If you have read the academics of Steinem's discussion on feminism, it would be clear to you. Done.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#46
I have read Steinem and that makes her comments even more inexcusable.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#48
It was her conversation, it is not reducing her to shit. Not nearly as clever as you think.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#10
"her 67 year old cleavage" That was the WHOLE point of the attack on her, and her calling
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#22
"Buddying with her bro's"? So you're saying she's not capable of independent thought?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#11
you can not say "you said it" then state "you implied". You just confirmed I did NOT say it. Lmao.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#24
"Buddying with her bro's" wasn't saying that she was trying to please men?
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#33
buddying is more hangin' don't you think? Or, you can interpret it to work for you, regardless.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#36
What did it mean in this context? She wasn't "hanging" with any men when she said that.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#38
The OP is talking about BernieBro's. BernieBros started the who reducing women to parts.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#42
Ha! I did not know smilies worked on jury posts. When I think of all the 2 fingered typing ...
ebayfool
Mar 2016
#67
The funny thing, is you are actually the sexist one and you are too brainwashed by your own BS...
phleshdef
Mar 2016
#66
I just wish they'd done it before the hearts drive, or let us know they were planning it.
polly7
Mar 2016
#73
How about the frenzy throwing Warren under the bus because she did not endorse before MA primary?
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#30
Which brings up the question - why is when Barack Obama ran for President, he didn't run on being
jillan
Mar 2016
#8
It is a baseless smear that has the scumbag David Brock written all over it nt
BernieforPres2016
Mar 2016
#28
If you collect boxtops you can send them in for smokin BernieBro merchandise:
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#58
Yeah a more appropriate term would have been Bernie stans rather than bros. Even though bros
seaglass
Mar 2016
#77
You have spent 9 months complaining about and sniping at Hillary supporters, clean your
seaglass
Mar 2016
#92
A tech editor for The Atlantic - male - coined the phrase BernieBro. I'm not looking for any
seaglass
Mar 2016
#94
Just how is "bros" NOT a sexist term when it refers only to MALES? And WTF does "stans" mean?
CharlotteVale
Mar 2016
#86