Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
51. Thanks to NAFTA, Conditions for Mexican Factory Workers Like Rosa Moreno Are Getting Worse
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

Texas Observer / By Melissa del Bosque

The difficult and dangerous working conditions that Rosa and at least 1.3 million other Mexican workers endure were supposed to get better. They didn't.



Photo Credit: Alan Pogue

December 11, 2013 |

.... On this night, Feb. 19, 2011, she couldn’t shake the feeling that something was wrong, a premonition that perhaps she shouldn’t go. But she needed the money. It was the final shift in her six-day workweek, and if she missed a day, the factory would dock her 300 pesos. She couldn’t afford to lose that kind of money. Her family already struggled to survive on the 1,300 pesos (about $100) a week she earned. Unable to shake the bad feeling, she’d already missed her bus, and now she’d have to pay for a taxi. But the thought of losing 300 pesos was worse. She had to go. Rosa kissed her six children goodnight and set out across town.

In the Mexican border city of Reynosa, the hundreds of maquiladoras that produce everything from car parts to flat-screen televisions run day and night—365 days a year—to feed global demand. Rosa worked from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. at a factory called HD Electronics in a sprawling maquiladora park near the international bridge that links Reynosa, an industrial city of 600,000, to Pharr, Texas. Like the 90,000 or more workers in Reynosa, the 38-year-old Rosa depended on these factories for her livelihood. In the 11 years since she moved to the city, she had welded circuitry for Asian and European cell phone companies, assembled tubing for medical IV units to be shipped over the border to the United States, and worked on a production line assembling air conditioners for General Motors.

This was her second month at HD Electronics, a South Korean firm that had moved to Reynosa in 2006 to produce the metal backing for flat-screen televisions made by another South Korean firm, LG Electronics—a $49 billion corporation. LG also has a plant in Reynosa and could scarcely keep up with the North American demand for its plasma and LCD televisions.

At HD Electronics, Rosa operated a 200-ton hydraulic stamping press. Every night, six days a week, she fed the massive machine thin aluminum sheets. The machine ran all day, every day. Each time the press closed it sounded like a giant hammer striking metal: thwack, thwack, thwack. The metal sheets emerged pierced and molded into shape for each model and size of television. At the factory, 20 women, including Rosa, worked the presses to make the pieces for the smaller televisions. Nearby were 10 larger presses, each of which took two men to operate, to make backings for the giant-screen models.


Full Article: http://www.alternet.org/labor/after-20-years-nafta-thanks-nafta-what-happened-mexican-factory-workers-rosa-moreno?akid=11305.44541.10ylde&rd=1&src=newsletter939436&t=21



NAFTA Is Starving Mexico

Thu Oct 20th 2011, 09:40 AM

By Laura Carlsen, October 20, 2011

"Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) became the law of the land, millions of Mexicans have joined the ranks of the hungry. Malnutrition is highest among the country’s farm families, who used to produce enough food to feed the nation.

As the blood-spattered violence of the drug war takes over the headlines, many Mexican men, women, and children confront the slow and silent violence of starvation. The latest reports show that the number of people living in “food poverty” (the inability to purchase the basic food basket) rose from 18 million in 2008 to 20 million by late 2010.

About one-fifth of Mexican children currently suffer from malnutrition. An innovative measurement applied by the National Institute for Nutrition registers a daily count of 728,909 malnourished children under five for October 18, 2011. Government statistics report that 25 percent of the population does not have access to basic food."

Full article: http://www.fpif.org/articles/nafta_is_starving_mexico


Millions of Mexican farmers and their families forced by NAFTA to the cities to work in dangerous conditions for low wages. That's not fair or free trade - it's relocating and decimating the lives of whole populations to further enrich those factory owners and the 1% corporations that benefit from these ugly deals.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is this a joke? SHRED Mar 2016 #1
which part? hill2016 Mar 2016 #2
Biggest Lie perpetrated on the American Worker FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #101
Gist of OP: Sanders=American Socialist; Clinton=Global Socialist, sacrificing Americans for world! TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #114
Yes. daleanime Mar 2016 #3
That explains our vanishing middle-class. dogman Mar 2016 #6
the US middle class IS THE top hill2016 Mar 2016 #15
And shrinking. dogman Mar 2016 #21
This is doubletalk. raging moderate Mar 2016 #80
We are seeing what's behind the curtain senz Mar 2016 #72
hard to tell sometimes GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #10
Clinton should definitely campaign on all those jobs she wants to keep sending to other countries. phantom power Mar 2016 #117
Third Way bullsh*t. Take your republican stances somewhere else. RiverLover Mar 2016 #4
Here-here Kittycat Mar 2016 #9
It's a bit rampant in the HRC side... SHRED Mar 2016 #14
I don't think they're a HRC supporter. PyaarRevolution Mar 2016 #47
Third Way, my ass. This is all-out corporatism. senz Mar 2016 #67
Take a close look Fairgo Mar 2016 #87
Yes. I know exactly what you mean. senz Mar 2016 #90
Wish we could rec posts - TY senz! and I'm bookmarking the post. n/t ebayfool Mar 2016 #104
It has provided slave labor jobs WDIM Mar 2016 #5
Wow. revbones Mar 2016 #7
I want a President of the United States, not a President of the World. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #8
The corporate world SHRED Mar 2016 #11
economic justice knows no boundaries hill2016 Mar 2016 #12
The jurisdiction of the US presidency DOES have boundaries - the US. closeupready Mar 2016 #25
Sadly, the proven "bottom up" model for redistribution that the left has always endorsed ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #29
We are supposed to be a representative democracy. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #39
What the hell are you talking about? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #48
Things you should understand but apparently act like you do not Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #49
Like what? Be specific. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #59
Sorry but world economic justice is not the role of the President. Bread and Circus Mar 2016 #35
Hmmm.... revbones Mar 2016 #82
Neoliberalism is the opposite of economic justice AgingAmerican Mar 2016 #93
I'd settle for an old-fashioned Democrat senz Mar 2016 #68
Don't expect anything resembling economic logic from Hillary bashers. DanTex Mar 2016 #13
So NAFTA and CAFTA were good for the USA working-class? SHRED Mar 2016 #18
NAFTA and CAFTA has resulted hill2016 Mar 2016 #23
So you are openly pro-NAFTA/CAFTA. How about TPP? senz Mar 2016 #70
Protectionism will kill our exports and raise consumer prices. The trading world is now global. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #16
Giving "protectionism" a bad name is rightwing SHRED Mar 2016 #24
Nonsense. Digitalization and large container ships have shrunk the world. Protectionism has Trust Buster Mar 2016 #31
Yeah...right SHRED Mar 2016 #37
Your video did not answer the seminal question in my mind. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #69
NAFTA slowed the job loss to mexico BlueStateLib Mar 2016 #103
Thank you. I enjoyed reading your link. It is as I expected. A much larger issue was involved. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #111
We grow internally and adapt the market Kittycat Mar 2016 #30
You meant FAIR trade, right? GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #17
Nah...that's not what they meant SHRED Mar 2016 #20
Apparently not. *sigh* GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #26
Wish in one hand... nt Chezboo Mar 2016 #44
Only a DINO would support NAFTA SHRED Mar 2016 #19
The actual researched numbers on how many jobs NAFTA really cost the US has debunked much Jitter65 Mar 2016 #109
And it affords suicide nets. Wilms Mar 2016 #22
Perfect response! GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #27
Fucking A !!!!! SamKnause Mar 2016 #33
+10000 farleftlib Mar 2016 #54
Omg - you're joking? nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #28
No, polly. I think we're seeing the truth here senz Mar 2016 #66
It is amazing that someone can be so totally clueless, unless SamKnause Mar 2016 #32
Hey folks, either a troll or further proof of right-wing infestation. Broward Mar 2016 #34
It's amazing this post is allowed to stand SHRED Mar 2016 #42
Setting aside DU for a moment, it's amazing Broward Mar 2016 #45
In the bigger picture...yes. SHRED Mar 2016 #46
Free trade does the opposite of redistribution AgingAmerican Mar 2016 #36
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #38
. mmonk Mar 2016 #40
But i thought Bernie was all about "redistribution." Even when Hillary supports same ideas as BS Jitter65 Mar 2016 #41
NAFTA and CAFTA are indeed "redistribution" plans SHRED Mar 2016 #43
All the "dems" rushing agree and endorse your RW economic talking points reveal themselves whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #50
Thanks to NAFTA, Conditions for Mexican Factory Workers Like Rosa Moreno Are Getting Worse polly7 Mar 2016 #51
thank you SHRED Mar 2016 #56
You're very welcome, SHRED. Sad as all this is. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #57
Rosa's story breaks my heart. closeupready Mar 2016 #61
Except that factory moved in the 1980s Recursion Mar 2016 #98
Mexican Maquiladora factories have been around since 1964 BlueStateLib Mar 2016 #100
Right, but LG built that particular one in IIRC 1987 Recursion Mar 2016 #105
OP Fixed... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #52
free trade=free slavery felix_numinous Mar 2016 #53
You dont read much, do you. bunnies Mar 2016 #55
Bullshit. Prove it with links and documentation. SHRED Mar 2016 #58
Well, thank god free trade appears to be one way under NAFTA. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #60
The redistribution has been from the poor and middle class to the rich angstlessk Mar 2016 #62
IIRC, An interesting point about the poverty numbers is... kristopher Mar 2016 #64
Provided jobs my ASS. Provided slave labor that feeds America's obsession with consumerism. phleshdef Mar 2016 #63
LOL, looks like the globalists are trotting out the old "protectionism is racist" BS. Odin2005 Mar 2016 #65
I'm convinced that you're a performance artist. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2016 #71
I sure hope you are correct TheSarcastinator Mar 2016 #73
The poorest 70% of the world's population has seen impressive income gains but pampango Mar 2016 #74
"The poorest 70% of the world's population has seen impressive income gains" kristopher Mar 2016 #75
This graph from Krugman shows the extent to which the poorest 70% have benefitted. pampango Mar 2016 #83
I think FDR was correct. kristopher Mar 2016 #84
What is 'fair trade' and what is 'free trade'? Do we get to 'fair trade' through negotiated pampango Mar 2016 #86
Fair trade prioritizes domestic workers' rights and the health of the middle class. kristopher Mar 2016 #88
I would add that fair trade prioritizes ALL workers' rights, not just pampango Mar 2016 #91
Nope. kristopher Mar 2016 #92
If FDR has 'seen it differently', he would have acted differently and not proposed the ITO which was pampango Mar 2016 #96
I'm not in the mood for this kind of hair splitting kristopher Mar 2016 #97
"... if it's win-lose something needs to guide the decision making." That's the difference. pampango Mar 2016 #99
I'm sorry but that is nonsense kristopher Mar 2016 #113
I "injected" Trump because he is the antithesis of FDR: a unilateralist vs an internationalist. pampango Mar 2016 #116
This isn't responsive to my point. kristopher Mar 2016 #112
My definition of free trade is like that between American states or France and Germany. pampango Mar 2016 #115
Free trade is bullshit, doesn't exist, kinda like self regulating capitalism LOL Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #76
Certainly provided jobs for people who make suicide nets! basselope Mar 2016 #77
What is 'free trade' to you? elleng Mar 2016 #78
At this point, you'll just make up any old bullshit and pretend to believe it. arcane1 Mar 2016 #79
Someone should just rejoin Republican Party. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #81
^^^ THIS ^^^ senz Mar 2016 #85
And you need income taxes around the world so that the profits of all that trade go applegrove Mar 2016 #89
"provided jobs where previously the best jobs were in rural subsistence farming"? Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #94
Haha! Another Anti-Protectionist, wanting to devalue the US to help other countries. How American? TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #95
you are so wrong! Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #102
NO ONE is against trade. Trade is a good thing and has happened since the beginning of civilization glowing Mar 2016 #106
Everyone seems to like trade in principle. Fewer like it in practice. pampango Mar 2016 #110
As a person who owns a small manufacturing business Sky Masterson Mar 2016 #107
There's a reason they put child-proof caps on those bottles. Fuddnik Mar 2016 #108
OP what are you using for reference or source for that statement? What I have read is the gains Todays_Illusion Mar 2016 #118
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»You can't have economic j...»Reply #51