2016 Postmortem

Trajan

(19,089 posts)

71. When did I ever sing ANY praises for a media pundit?

Reply to Trenzalore (Reply #64)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:19 PM

Mar 2016

Get a grip ...

And ... Who are 'you people'?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

103 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maddow - Establishment Media Hack [View all] kcjohn1 Mar 2016 OP

At one time I thought she Nite Owl Mar 2016 #1

Are you sure KO is backing Bernie? jwirr Mar 2016 #39

And is that the determiner of "establishment hack"? 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #79

Rachel's former Air America peeps floriduck Mar 2016 #94

Rachel "Hillary may I kiss your ring?" Maddow? Avalux Mar 2016 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Mar 2016 #7

Corrupt since she does not hate Hillary, LOL. Okay. bettyellen Mar 2016 #52

I think a week ago Trenzalore Mar 2016 #61

She gushed the "birdie" incident was adorable and people were mad she said that it was not bettyellen Mar 2016 #65

Well that explains it Trenzalore Mar 2016 #69

I wish I was kidding. It appears to me a lot of people overreact without listening or reading. bettyellen Mar 2016 #72

this. nt restorefreedom Mar 2016 #34

she appears desperate to elect a president with 'Lady parts' peacebird Mar 2016 #3

They get angry when you tell them this thereismore Mar 2016 #10

What do you base that opinion on? Wondering if she has said something that made you think so or if JudyM Mar 2016 #43

Of course not. But it allows that person to be dismiss without having to address any deeper issues. shadowandblossom Mar 2016 #93

oh god just stop these gross insults, please. bettyellen Mar 2016 #70

Why don't you address thereismore's reply to that post? He's in your camp and saying the same thing. JudyM Mar 2016 #95

I'm not in anyone's "camp" yet. This "lady part" shit mocks many many Dem women. bettyellen Mar 2016 #97

I can tell you I have canvassed many, many women who are voting for Hillary because of her gender. JudyM Mar 2016 #98

Ah, I get you. People have very odd views, someone just called it "the novelty of a woman bettyellen Mar 2016 #99

LOL Trump wld be as much of a "novelty" as Hillary, if not more so. Let's hope that doesn't catch on JudyM Mar 2016 #100

It was a young guy that said it. He also said engineers are apolitical, as if it was common bettyellen Mar 2016 #101

I'm very disappointed boobooday Mar 2016 #4

All she has to do is he look up his spend in super Tuesday kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #8

Reporting actual pledged delegate results from Saturday = Hack. Agschmid Mar 2016 #5

If we are going to hold that view, how about consistency? kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #12

She was only talking about pledged delegates... Agschmid Mar 2016 #15

It wasn't kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #19

So super delegates shouldn't count because the aren't finalized mythology Mar 2016 #38

You should be taking up this inconsistency with Maddow kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #41

The delegates from caucus states like Iowa are not finalized. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #102

The sad thing is Hillary would have denied her right to marry. onecaliberal Mar 2016 #6

Hillary has her own personal beliefs as many others, but I doubt she would deny anyone's right to Jitter65 Mar 2016 #22

before 2013 she would of Gwhittey Mar 2016 #88

Maddow tells what Tad Devine said today and she goes under the bus AGAIN riversedge Mar 2016 #9

Tell me kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #14

Nevada is in the South... Agschmid Mar 2016 #16

Divine didn't say they didn't compete in NV kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #17

But he did compete... Agschmid Mar 2016 #21

Sanders spend $3M in ads in NV kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #24

Offices/People on the Ground... And yes I'm going to say that. Agschmid Mar 2016 #26

Another decent progressive under the Sanders purity bus. nt. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #11

She is NOT progressive for fucks sake. Open your eyes. Use your brain. onecaliberal Mar 2016 #29

Anyone who disagrees with the dear leader must be attacked. nt. Trenzalore Mar 2016 #33

She cannot be a decent progressive ... Trajan Mar 2016 #42

All of her work for the people of Flint over the past 5 months Trenzalore Mar 2016 #46

Ain't that a shame Trajan Mar 2016 #54

We need a lot more Maddows. Renew Deal Mar 2016 #58

I remember a week ago Trenzalore Mar 2016 #59

I haven't watched national news media since 2000 ... Trajan Mar 2016 #63

I'm laughing Trenzalore Mar 2016 #64

When did I ever sing ANY praises for a media pundit? Trajan Mar 2016 #71

hack = anybody who does fall down and worship the suddenly a democrat nt msongs Mar 2016 #13

Rachel Maddow is the liberal version of Bill O'Reilly. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #18

Except not at all... Agschmid Mar 2016 #23

Keep Supporting the Corporatist Monster Or Your Gone n/t LarryNM Mar 2016 #20

For crying out loud,people sadoldgirl Mar 2016 #25

She spreads lies and propaganda to the low info. Aiding destruction of democracy onecaliberal Mar 2016 #32

"Low Info" Ccarmona Mar 2016 #47

I've got news for you NOT all of them watch faux onecaliberal Mar 2016 #83

Low info? Bourgeois propaganda. bettyellen Mar 2016 #75

I guess everyone has her price. dchill Mar 2016 #27

what did she say that is wrong? MFM008 Mar 2016 #28

3 Things Actually kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #35

She tried to claim Tad Devine lied by saying they ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #37

Yeah the sarcasm marions ghost Mar 2016 #78

She's certainly become that. I no longer watch ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #30

It's amazing; the Sanders folks get more abrasive whether he wins or loses. brooklynite Mar 2016 #31

Some talk about real issues, not as abrasive as your preference in doling out bitter personal slams. JudyM Mar 2016 #55

Here's some thoughtful "real issues" thrown at me this evening... brooklynite Mar 2016 #57

IMO that is quite tame compared to the tone and content of your posts as I have observed them these JudyM Mar 2016 #67

http://demrace.com/ Delegate Tracker kenn3d Mar 2016 #36

Sanders won 105 delegates, not 95. Then the difference mathematically works. nt RepubliCON-Watch Mar 2016 #89

TY - corrected kenn3d Mar 2016 #96

OFFS madamesilverspurs Mar 2016 #40

Very few kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #44

OFFS ... Trajan Mar 2016 #50

The Young Turks- in fact, they should be hosting the debates! bettyellen Mar 2016 #62

Maddow isn't a journalist; she's a political commentator nt TheDormouse Mar 2016 #45

Not even a good one kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #48

she better watch out when keith is back up and running. he hasnt forgoten how she ignored him litlbilly Mar 2016 #49

Keith will implode in 6 months Trenzalore Mar 2016 #60

thats all hes gonna need, 6 months litlbilly Mar 2016 #74

He needs to land where people will actually hear him Trenzalore Mar 2016 #80

he could probably join tyt, that might work litlbilly Mar 2016 #81

nothing he could say to outdo cenk and company:) litlbilly Mar 2016 #82

ignored him? was there an incident? bettyellen Mar 2016 #73

Oh, yeah, I was yelling at the TV. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #51

She seemed to fall in line a while back when others were fired... polichick Mar 2016 #53

She's an unethical hack. Haven't watched her in years. CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #56

#BoycottMSNBC The comcast ceo fundraises for Hillary. jillan Mar 2016 #66

Oh no!! Here comes the bus! bravenak Mar 2016 #68

Unbelievable lately... stevenleser Mar 2016 #85

Daily thing. bravenak Mar 2016 #86

Sorry that some people can't handle the truth Tommy2Tone Mar 2016 #76

Y'all loved her the last time she interviewed Bernie. emulatorloo Mar 2016 #77

Has she stopped devoting the fist 30 minutes of each and every show to GOP coverage? KeepItReal Mar 2016 #84

Math is math Gothmog Mar 2016 #87

Ms. Selective Outrage has sold any journalistic integrity she might have had a long time ago. Skwmom Mar 2016 #90

Bernie is losing, even when it looks like he's winning at times. dubyadiprecession Mar 2016 #91

Cut the lead by 66 last weekend krawhitham Mar 2016 #92

This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #103