Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Susan Sarandon represents what this country needs more of: Independent Thinkers. [View all]Autumn
(48,966 posts)72. Those factories are gone and they aren't coming back. Such a silly remark. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Susan Sarandon represents what this country needs more of: Independent Thinkers. [View all]
Skwmom
Mar 2016
OP
The looks on the faces of the corp hacks when they are confronted w/someone who isn't buying into
Skwmom
Mar 2016
#3
By putting a Republican in office if Hillary is nominated. Not my kind of reality.
HERVEPA
Mar 2016
#2
I know Republicans who are planning on voting for her. So she won't need progressives like me.
lostnfound
Mar 2016
#102
I keep reading Republicans hate her, and then shit like this. Seriously, get your stories straight.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#110
I love how it's never the fault of the dems for running bad candidates on a bad platform with a bad
GreenPartyVoter
Mar 2016
#86
In a Senate vote where the choice was between siding with Bush or all those against the invasion...
Armstead
Mar 2016
#95
Well, considering Hillary is 50/50 against Trump and has an active FBI investigation on her
Hydra
Mar 2016
#55
I thought they both denied it. But if so, it is pretty brilliant. Trump is not going to win in Nov.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#82
maybe Joe and Jill sixpack haven't seen any improvement in their economies under Obama.
Cobalt Violet
Mar 2016
#92
I find some great independent thinkers among the working class. On the other hand,
Skwmom
Mar 2016
#7
She would most likely write in Bernie's name or vote for Jill Stein.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#19
Or rich people who can afford to vote for Donald Trump... most Americans can't afford to take that..
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#15
Funny. I think that about all of the rich people endorsing Clinton (e.g., Clooney).
Skwmom
Mar 2016
#18
"when you talk about ghettos traditionally, what you talk about is African-American communities. "
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#22
Oh give it a rest, out of context quotes don't work here, we're not stupid.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#29
There's no context for that statement that's not negative and blacks aren't rich according to...
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#33
ummm, no... we can all read and his statement was fucked up period full stop. Either way,...
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#39
Yes we can, and by the way, ghetto is not just a word that applies to African Americans
nadinbrzezinski
Mar 2016
#42
Racist bullshit is Sanders having Cornell West stump for him but mostly in front of white people
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#45
No one wants to silence Cornell West but Sanders, I've not seen hide nor hair of the dude since IA..
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#49
Nice try but like I said people here aren't stupid, we see what you're doing.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#50
People don't have to be smart either to see that statement in many context is bad. There's nothing
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#98
I understand history just fine, Sanders repeated a meme that started in the 80s and it was wrong
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#100
No he didn't, that's your spin and it has nothing to do with what he said or meant.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#101
If you supported the right candidate you wouldn't have to worry about the shit storm.
ThePhilosopher04
Mar 2016
#43
It was so easy for many to transfer their hate and anger away from the suprme court
Autumn
Mar 2016
#84
No, she doesn't believe people should vote depending on which body parts they have
polly7
Mar 2016
#105
She reduces women to body parts. There is no reason to reduce women to a mere body part,
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#109
FIRST sentence. Ya, ... when reducing to body part like, calling women vaginas, I am gonna call it
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#115
How ironic, this woman telling us not to vote our vagina, as she suggest a Repug, taking away girls
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#118
Nah ........ seabeyond fucked up, just as you did with those horrible, nasty Femen women.
polly7
Mar 2016
#124
Back pedal? Riding your stationery? That's excellent, you should go forward though,
polly7
Mar 2016
#126
You'll need to document your claim. Proof is required--an unfortunate consequence of the
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2016
#114
Well dude, it is kinda all over the net. BWTH, if one doesnt follow the campaigns and the happening
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#116
Remember your posts telling LGBT we had 'plenty of rights already'? I sure do.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#94
Someone thinking for themselves is frightening to the group thinkers.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2016
#103
Anybody like Sarandon who would support Trump over Hillary or Bernie is an uneducated voter.
LonePirate
Mar 2016
#106
She supports BERNIE, and go watch what she said for yourself. have you seen it?
peacebird
Mar 2016
#127