Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sarandon is contemptible [View all]Gothmog
(180,085 posts)95. Sorry, Bernie Sanders. There is zero evidence of your ‘political revolution’ yet
While this article is a little dated, no one has seen any evidence of the so-called Sanders revolution https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/02/10/sorry-bernie-sanders-there-is-zero-evidence-of-your-political-revolution-yet/
Bernie Sanders recorded a resounding victory in New Hampshire's Democratic primary Tuesday. He crushed his rival, Hillary Clinton, with no less than 60 percent of the vote. If Sanders hopes not only to win the election but to achieve his ambitious progressive agenda, though, that might not be enough.
To succeed, Sanders might have to drive Americans who don't normally participate to the polls. Unfortunately for him, groups who usually do not vote did not turn out in unusually large numbers in New Hampshire, according to exit polling data.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=
&w=1484
...As for Sanders, he credited his victory to turnout. "Because of a huge voter turnout -- and I say huge -- we won," he said in his speech declaring victory, dropping the "h" in "huge." "We harnessed the energy, and the excitement that the Democratic party will need to succeed in November."
In fact, Sanders won by persuading many habitual Democratic primary voters to support him. With 95 percent of precincts reporting their results as of Wednesday morning, just 241,000 ballots had been cast in the Democratic primary, fewer than the 268,000 projected by New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner last week. Nearly 289,000 voters cast ballots in the state's Democratic primary in 2008.
To be sure, the general election is still seven months away. Ordinary Americans might be paying little attention to the campaign at this point, and if Sanders wins the nomination, he'll have the help of the Democratic Party apparatus in registering new voters. The political revolution hasn't started, though, at least not yet.
To succeed, Sanders might have to drive Americans who don't normally participate to the polls. Unfortunately for him, groups who usually do not vote did not turn out in unusually large numbers in New Hampshire, according to exit polling data.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=
&w=1484
...As for Sanders, he credited his victory to turnout. "Because of a huge voter turnout -- and I say huge -- we won," he said in his speech declaring victory, dropping the "h" in "huge." "We harnessed the energy, and the excitement that the Democratic party will need to succeed in November."
In fact, Sanders won by persuading many habitual Democratic primary voters to support him. With 95 percent of precincts reporting their results as of Wednesday morning, just 241,000 ballots had been cast in the Democratic primary, fewer than the 268,000 projected by New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner last week. Nearly 289,000 voters cast ballots in the state's Democratic primary in 2008.
To be sure, the general election is still seven months away. Ordinary Americans might be paying little attention to the campaign at this point, and if Sanders wins the nomination, he'll have the help of the Democratic Party apparatus in registering new voters. The political revolution hasn't started, though, at least not yet.
Without this revolution, I am not sure how Sanders proposes to advance his unrealistic agenda
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And others think that electing Bernie will bring the revolution, as Susan Sarandon &I do
peacebird
Mar 2016
#2
Silly, Bernie has always said Revolution depends on We, The People stepping up & demanding it.
peacebird
Mar 2016
#12
She only had more votes in 2008 because Obama didn't participate in Michigan
NobodyHere
Mar 2016
#129
Sorry, Bernie Sanders. There is zero evidence of your ‘political revolution’ yet
Gothmog
Mar 2016
#95
Revolution would happen if Twitter and Facebook didn't disrupt their trending memes, dammit!!
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#114
It sounds like the only thing Bernie's revolution has stepped up and demanded is that Bernie become
EffieBlack
Mar 2016
#132
"the refugees have a branding problem" She should be sitting on the beach instead of sharing these
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#32
Smiling at the idea of Trump bringing the nation to it's knees is fucking reprehensible.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#39
Not sure who you are inferring is "uninvolved" but idiot schemes to bring the nation down?
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#50
I honestly didn't haven't seen what she said yet, I'm just weary of everytime a white...
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2016
#64
Why is that contemptible? It's true. What is contemptible about speaking an indisputable truth?
Vote2016
Mar 2016
#20
I don't understand the poutrage either, some people do say that, she's not the one saying it.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#23
They are acting as if Sarandon was supporting Trump (she's not). They're acting like she's the only
Vote2016
Mar 2016
#27
That's how I read it too, why would she vote for Trump? She supports Bernie.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2016
#29
Her saying she would prefer the nation to collapse because of Trump is okay by you?
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#43
She smiled and laughed while talking about it- said the "status quo" was more dangerous.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#52
I highly recommend you watch the interview. The line about Trump bringing The Revolution....
Hekate
Mar 2016
#78
lol! "Dear Susan, please frown more when discussing the orange clown. Thanks, Mgmt."
Vote2016
Mar 2016
#42
"Dear Susan, P.S. About the eyes. Tone down the sparkle a bit, hmmmmk? Thanks, the Mgmt."
Vote2016
Mar 2016
#51
Her being gleeful about "things will really explode". Not wise, and pretty fucking heartless.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#115
She is talking about the "things will really explode." nationwide to millions of people.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#116
Hillary NEEDS Trump because it wouldn't even be close if we foolishly nominated her to run against
Vote2016
Mar 2016
#48
She never once said that she would vote for Trump. That is a provable lie.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2016
#128
gleefully promoting scorched earth fantasies is an option- and she took it.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#117
It is unfortunate she can't represent Bernie's ideas instead of this scorched earth bullshit.
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#119
She doesn't want to play the game as dictated. Oh, those independent thinkers...
Skwmom
Mar 2016
#26
I'll save "contemptible" to describe those looking to prop up a disgusting loan-sharking industry.
bullwinkle428
Mar 2016
#38
What exactly is wrong with the statement and why does it make her "contemptible"?
BlueStater
Mar 2016
#41
You know perfectly well who I'm talking about. Calling Hillary a Dillattante is one of the most
lunamagica
Mar 2016
#124
Chris Hayes looked absolutely gobsmacked. She looked like a starry-eyed 17 year old...
Hekate
Mar 2016
#75
If Trump gets elected, I'd be more willing to bet on a fascist revolution than a socialist one....
steve2470
Mar 2016
#98
it's too much hard work. people seem to thing insta-revolution is possible. brought to you by
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#111
Okay, take out your yellow highlighter and run it across "Some people think...".
KamaAina
Mar 2016
#126
If Bernie is "responsible" for Susan Sarandon's comments and comments
TheSarcastinator
Mar 2016
#131