Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brush

(61,033 posts)
60. You're right. Repugs are going to vote for their candidate whoever it is.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

Which means many, many +1 votes for Trump or Cruz, both disasters for the country.

Many BS supporters say they won't vote unless Sanders gets the nomination, which equates to many 0 votes for Clinton if she gets the nomination.

Those +1 votes for Trump or Cruz tally in positive numbers for repugs while those 0 votes for Clinton actually do nothing for the dem vote tally.

Wait, the 0 votes for Clinton actually do do something for the dem vote tally.

They suppress it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The problem is when people equate not voting for Hillary with that. nt revbones Mar 2016 #1
^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #4
Dead wrong. Sitting out the election helps the GOP win, simple fact of math. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #32
Not in red and blue states, those votes don't count at all. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #36
Sitting out the election is what happens when you shit in an ice cream cone and call it soft serve Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #53
Amen.... daleanime Mar 2016 #51
Thank you! polichick Mar 2016 #6
0 + 0 does not equal 1. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #21
Many registered "Independent" voters have come out in the primaries NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #56
And Trump will never be the nominee for president. n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #2
He may or may not be. I wouldn't say "never" though. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2016 #3
Trump is better than Cruz... so I hope to god Trump gets it... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #7
Yes, Cruz is much, much worse than Trump ... nt salinsky Mar 2016 #15
Agreed, Cruz appears to actually be nuts. Scuba Mar 2016 #46
Consider the terms VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #23
I'm convinced he doesn't really want to be president, so I'm not worried about him. arcane1 Mar 2016 #17
And they should also not consider sitting out the GE or voting third party, which has the effect of DanTex Mar 2016 #5
NewsFlash: You do not get to tell people how to vote. 1 Person = 1 Vote GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #9
You have every right to vote for Trump. But you shouldn't. DanTex Mar 2016 #10
Here comes the rabbit hole.... revbones Mar 2016 #12
People supporting Trump on a Democratic forum, I'm gonna call it out. Enjoy your stay! DanTex Mar 2016 #14
Show me the post where I supported Trump please. nt revbones Mar 2016 #16
Bernie or Bust is pro-Trump. You're not fooling anyone. DanTex Mar 2016 #18
You are quite hillarious. revbones Mar 2016 #20
Heh. War and peanut butter. Meanwhile, back in the real world, yes, BoB is pro-Trump. DanTex Mar 2016 #24
Sure. Is the sky blue in your version of reality as well? revbones Mar 2016 #27
Yes, he is, isn't he? I rarely respond to him, but when I do, closeupready Mar 2016 #57
Look at it this was. Not a 0 vote for Clinton but "one less vote for Clinton". brush Mar 2016 #48
While slightly more accurate, revbones Mar 2016 #50
You're right. Repugs are going to vote for their candidate whoever it is. brush Mar 2016 #60
Wow. That is truly some creative math there. rofl revbones Mar 2016 #61
Thought you'd like the math. brush Mar 2016 #63
There is no 1 Person=1 Vote while the Electoral College is in effect...duh n/t Sheepshank Mar 2016 #22
This is fortunately true. At the same time, anyone who would sit out the Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #37
NewsFlash: Advocating a vote against a Dem in the GE is a violation of DU's ToS. LonePirate Mar 2016 #38
NewFlash: Not Voting for someone is not an implicit vote for somebody else. GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #44
Same false logic, different day... nt revbones Mar 2016 #11
I'm afraid we're going to have a bit of a PUMA problem in the short term--not in the long term, MADem Mar 2016 #8
I invested in sending a long term message Armstead Mar 2016 #13
Well, the primary season does serve to air those issues, and that's a good thing, I believe. nt MADem Mar 2016 #29
You'll have to ask the people posting HA Goodman pieces here about that nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #19
Without reservation yes. mythology Mar 2016 #25
No one at DU is going to vote for Trump in the GE Doctor_J Mar 2016 #26
Agree winetourdriver Mar 2016 #28
And that accounts for all the bannings of long time posters on Hillary's side? merrily Mar 2016 #34
78 posts and you're an expert on this site? beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #39
No, just ignored (for good reason). Maedhros Mar 2016 #49
All pledge and pledge type OP's stink. JMO merrily Mar 2016 #30
Unless the Ghost of Adolph Hitler emerges and runs for President against Trump..... Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2016 #40
Which has nothing to do with my post about pledge OPs. merrily Mar 2016 #47
What possible use is this question? peace13 Mar 2016 #31
Agreed. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #33
One would think so, but many are so in the grips of their fervent hatred of a candidate synergie Mar 2016 #35
If stopping Trump is your main reason for voting, you ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #41
I don't see why we have to worry about this much at this point Jarqui Mar 2016 #42
Why should you tell anybody who you will or won't vote for? tularetom Mar 2016 #43
Who's saying they're going to vote for Trump? ibegurpard Mar 2016 #45
OH in-DEED! Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #52
have they changed the ge ballots? restorefreedom Mar 2016 #54
I'm guessing the GOP elites take it from Trump at their convention.. HughLefty1 Mar 2016 #55
Are you aware if she had similar levels of corporate funding in 2008 Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #62
Trump has little chance of getting the number of delegates... Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #58
That is very, very, very obvious and should apply to ANY republican nominee not just Trump. pampango Mar 2016 #59
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Can we all agree on what ...»Reply #60