Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: "the Sanders campaign is simply pulling numbers out of the air." [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)172. ''When Wall Street firms lie about their finances, the legal term that applies is 'fraud.'''
William K. Black helped put the S&L crooks behind bars in the 1990s as a regulator and forensic economist for the SEC. Black helped Iceland put its banksters behind bars, but for some reason, the Federal government failed to call on him for help in the great Bankster Bailout of 2008. He knows a bit about Inspector Generals and Control Fraud.
The Clintons Have Not Changed: The Clintonian War on the IGs
By William K. Black
February 23, 2016 Bloomington, MN
Secretary Hillary Clinton is asking Democratic voters to believe that she has experienced a Road to Damascus conversion from her roots as a leader of the New Democrats the Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party. When exactly this conversion occurred is never stated, but an interesting fact has emerged that demonstrates it did not occur during her service as the Secretary of State. A Wall Street Journal story provides the key facts, but none of the analysis.
Newly released emails indicate that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top staff were involved in the selection process for the State Departments internal watchdog, a position that ultimately went unfilled throughout her four-year tenure.
The WSJs angle is that such involvement in the selection of the Inspector General (IG) is a threat to the IGs vital independence. True, and also true as the story notes that Hillary was far from rare as an agency or department head in seeking to select behind the scenes the supposedly independent IGs.
The function of the IG is to speak truth to power. Naturally, power hates IGs with a purple passion. Government leaders are most likely to hate having its abuses made public by IG when the government leader is secretly acting in concert with immensely powerful private leaders for their mutual benefit at the expense of the public.
What the WSJ missed is that the Clintons, for decades, have sought to destroy the independence and effectiveness of the IGs precisely because of the threat that they pose of blowing the whistle on these abuses. The Obama administration, of course, is famous for its prosecutions of those who blow the whistle on such abuses. The real story is not that Hillary attempted to select a lap dog as IG the real story is that for her entire tenure as Secretary, four years, she left unfilled the leadership position of the only institution in the State Department dedicated to maintaining integrity and preventing the abuse of public power to aid cronies. That aid, of course, comes with the clear expectation that the cronies will make the head of the State Department wealthy as soon as she or he steps down. There is no possible defense for that, and it does not happen accidentally. The primary blame goes to President Obama, who made no nomination for the position for the entire four years. It wasnt Republican intransigence that explains this scandal.
CONTINUED...
http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2016/03/clintons-not-changed-clintonian-war-igs.html#more-10101
Bill Black coined the phrase "Control Fraud" to describe crooked CEOs. Dr. Black is one of "those" economists who won't play ball with the money crowd. Why? He. Has. Integrity.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
174 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"the Sanders campaign is simply pulling numbers out of the air." [View all]
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
OP
"We spend twice as much per capita on health care as any other nation on earth"
Recursion
Mar 2016
#107
We spend twice the OECD average, but not "twice as much as any other industrialized country"
Recursion
Mar 2016
#165
Is that how you rationalize the privatization of Social Security? And ending food stamps?
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#48
Neither of those things will happen with Hillary. With the Republicans-probably
redstateblues
Mar 2016
#66
Where did Dylan Matthews get these numbers? I can't find them anywhere other than in these
think
Mar 2016
#109
So now you claim Freidman is a quack? You're entitled to your opinion but in case you haven't notice
think
Mar 2016
#113
You think it's just wonderful that people failed to notice that their current premiums would--
eridani
Mar 2016
#5
It can work if done right, but to do it right you have to do the math right.
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#73
Yes, by about 10 percent at the most... that's not enough savings to tear shit up
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#16
Unnnn, still not worth tearin shit up... that's what the national SP plan would do too.
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#29
and keeps the the overtly parasitic doctors, pharma and hospital corporations. So instead of paying
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#38
From an estimate by a couple of UW professors on the Washington Health Security Trust n/t
eridani
Mar 2016
#114
I just wanted to read the details of the info you had and where it came from
Sheepshank
Mar 2016
#171
You guys rationalize why Goldman-Sachs should rip us off and dare pretend that you care.
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#22
+1, Magic asterisks, conciliatory GOP congress's, ponies, unicorns and podium bird..
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#12
This is the reason I think he's staying in, Tad Devine has a Reddit account and someones convinced
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#19
+1, they're even winning nearly the same constituency Hillary lost with in 2008... lol on "whitey
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#23
I disagree with your first statement IE the Sanders camp discontent with Obama. Overnight is relativ
uponit7771
Mar 2016
#142
And you are willing to turn your backs on the 16,000,000 American children living in poverty.
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#25
Don't pretend you care about honesty. You side with those that want money over everything.
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#36
Those that bow before the golden calf are easy to read. Greed uber alles. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#52
She pockets a lot of it. $150,000,000 while pretending she cares about the peons. I guess you
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#50
How do you rationalize siding with those that would kill SS and other safety nets.
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#56
You are mistaken if you think the Class War is between Democrats and Republicons.
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#164
What is sad is your rationaliziations to give all our resources to the wealthy and the hell with
rhett o rick
Mar 2016
#54
Apparently, neither Mr. Starr, nor yourself, are familiar with the concept of "forecasting".
opiate69
Mar 2016
#60
No, what happened was that Sanders claimed he could save $325 billion per year
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#65
It is 100% possible to save that much. The actual savings will of course depent on--
eridani
Mar 2016
#124
My question is...why don't Sanders and Clinton compromise with the public option?
JonLeibowitz
Mar 2016
#57
Sigh...so single/multi payer (where the math doesn't currently add up) is the only option?
JonLeibowitz
Mar 2016
#64
How long term? She's not campaigning on it, she mentions protecting/expanding ACA
JonLeibowitz
Mar 2016
#82
Yes, but the candidate has to campaign on that! Sanders would no doubt fall back to what she wants
JonLeibowitz
Mar 2016
#89
A shitload of Dems agree with Hillary Clinton. For profit private insurance is forever.
delrem
Mar 2016
#49
Thank you, the OP is such a dishonest and terrible representation of Bernie's plan. n/t
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#133
When I put in the numbers for me it told me that I would pay more in taxes.
LiberalFighter
Mar 2016
#81
They built their systems over decades without ever relying on employers to provide
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#100
Taiwan's not strictly single payer (there are copays), but we should emulate their system
Recursion
Mar 2016
#122
Copays or no copays have nothing to do with whether a system is single payer or not
eridani
Mar 2016
#123
Krugman- Sanders health plan looks a little bit like a standard Republican tax-cut plan
Gothmog
Mar 2016
#131
James Galbraith Describes Major Forecast Failure in Model Used by Romers to Attack Friedman on Sande
Jefferson23
Mar 2016
#144
Sad day when so called liberals are supporting arguments AGAINST single payer.
Jackie Wilson Said
Mar 2016
#153
Yeah but he didnt fudge the numbers, at least not on purpose. Figuring out how to do it
Jackie Wilson Said
Mar 2016
#156
Ha ha! Did you see the post of the 179 top economists who endorsed Bernie's plan?
pdsimdars
Mar 2016
#170
''When Wall Street firms lie about their finances, the legal term that applies is 'fraud.'''
Octafish
Mar 2016
#172