Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Response to Gregorian (Reply #42)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The question was explicitly about Clinton, in the event that she was the nominee.
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#61
So, when Sanders supports swarm Facebooks for Hillary surrogates are they Dixie-chicked??
riversedge
Mar 2016
#10
she also has said thing directly about Clinton, but you KNOW that is NOT the issue here?
bettyellen
Mar 2016
#69
No but if they're going to challenge her, it should be on something she actually said.
Jarqui
Mar 2016
#12
Actually, he's riffing on a quote by Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, a Democrat, who famously originated
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#59
Ronald Reagan: I knew Thomas Jefferson, and Governor, You're no Thomas Jefferson!
TheBlackAdder
Mar 2016
#81
Nope, you are wrong. You can look it up in the Wikipedia link in my previous post.
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#85
LOL. I must have missed the coordinate right-wing business campaign to ruin her career.
DanTex
Mar 2016
#7
Aha - there's your problem. You don't know what happened to the Dixie Chicks
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2016
#72
I remember that the Dixie Chicks were Dixie Chicked by the Republicans
BernieforPres2016
Mar 2016
#16
Susan's milieu is also Hollywood 2016, where her Bernie support will cost her nothing in terms
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#41
I don't understand why either. What she said is not nearly as offensive as what Madeline Albright
jillan
Mar 2016
#31
I will never forget at the PBS debate when Hillary was given the opportunity to apologize to women
jillan
Mar 2016
#38
No she isn't. Hillary Clinton is the "likely" candidate. Faux coyness about Sarandon's
Tanuki
Mar 2016
#43
She's actually being swift-boated since she never said what they are saying she said.
cui bono
Mar 2016
#37
Exactly. She said "people are saying..." about Trump bringing the revolution quicker.
cui bono
Mar 2016
#76
An untrained and careless spokeperson expressed herself in a silly way
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2016
#53
She's untrained and sounded like a "Heighten the Contradictions" style dumbass
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2016
#56
They are McCarthyists, pure and simple. They are the Reagan Democrats. Conservative and reactionary.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#55
All these people fuming at Susan were sanguine about Hillary's love song to Ron and Nancy
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#66
Except she said none of that, and your candidate spent years citing her Christian faith when
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#65
How about those that have been suffering ever since Reagan and the Democrats who are
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2016
#77
Only Hillary supporters can be attacked for what they say during interviews on TV.
JoePhilly
Mar 2016
#62
Shouldn't her endorsement of IWR sponsor John Edwards in 2008 disqualify her opinion?
CalvinballPro
Mar 2016
#71
Dixie Chicks attacked for what they said. Sarandon attacked for something she didn't even say
Attorney in Texas
Mar 2016
#74