Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: David Brock is Keyser Söze. [View all]Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)38. No, just an admitted slime merchant and misogynist- Smearing Anita Hill
Thomas denied Hill's accusations, few witnesses were called to support her (she wasn't the nominee) and the nominee was confirmed, 52 to 48. But that didn't settle the mystery at the heart of those hearings. In front of the whole country and under oath, one of two people had lied. Since one of those people is now a Supreme Court Justice who cast a vote making George W. Bush President, the point is far from moot. And last week the mystery took another turn, thanks to former American Spectator character assassin David Brock, the man designated by the right to destroy Hill's reputation and scrub Thomas'. Brock confesses in a Talk magazine excerpt of his new book, Blinded by the Right, that he had printed "virtually every derogatory and often contradictory allegation" he could to make Hill seem "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty." If that was all Brock did, we might have nothing more than another sin committed on behalf of the vast right-wing conspiracy. But Brock, who has forged a second career as a recovering conservative, makes one admission that implicates Thomas. Brock says he used information that came indirectly from Thomas to force a retraction from a woman named Kaye Savage, who had come forward in support of Hill. Brock threatened to publicize vicious charges made by her ex-husband in a sealed child-custody dispute.
In an interview with TIME last week, Savage recalled her meeting with Brock in the lobby of the Marriott Hotel in downtown Washington in 1994. A book titled Strange Justice, by reporters Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson, had just come out and it used on-the-record interviews to argue persuasively that Thomas had indeed subjected a number of women to frequent sexually explicit remarks about porno videos. Savage, a black mid-level aide in the Reagan Administration, told both the authors and the Judiciary Committee (although she wasn't called to testify publicly) that when she went to Thomas' apartment in the early 1980s, the place was littered with graphic photos of nude women. When Savage met Brock, she says, he let her know he could ruin her. "He knew all this personal stuff," she says. "He wanted me to take back what I had said. I couldn't it was true but I was intimidated, and so I faxed him something innocuous. I was scared."
http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,167355,00.html
So that's what you and yours are making light of.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's filth. If you can do that to another human being then you are intrinsically corrupted.
Kentonio
Mar 2016
#19
Clinton Ethics- We get to say anything, then say sorry, then say something worse.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#40
Clarence Thomas was appointed by George H.W. Bush, for whom Elizabeth Warren voted.
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#41
What's Warren got to do with your downplaying Brock's history? I'm no fan of Senator Warren's
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#50
Kaye Savage, witness in the Thomas hearings, recalls her meeting with Brock:
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#44
"waah SCOTUS!" whines the faction benefiting from CU, that didn't fight FL 2000,
MisterP
Mar 2016
#30
no, I'm making fun of the fact that Bernie fans are treating him like the master
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#39
No, you are making light of the known facts about Brock. It's very valid not to trust a person with
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#42
no, I am pointing out that someone who isn't even affiliated with Clinton's campaign
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#46
Sure, whatever you need to tell yourself. I note that you still have not addressed what his actual
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#48
I've fully acknowledged he did really scummy things back then, it's not even deniable.
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#49
You took part in the photos stuff, about 52 year old photos. But for Brock, 30 is just ancient times
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#55
David Brock is a sleazeball ass, and I don't care who you intend to vote for.
ScreamingMeemie
Mar 2016
#47
Wrong. He did call Anita Hill "a little nutty and a bit slutty" though. So there's that.
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2016
#52
Anything to defend a sleaze merchant I guess--If the sleaze merchant is for Hillary.
BillZBubb
Mar 2016
#54