Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
38. No, just an admitted slime merchant and misogynist- Smearing Anita Hill
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

Thomas denied Hill's accusations, few witnesses were called to support her (she wasn't the nominee) and the nominee was confirmed, 52 to 48. But that didn't settle the mystery at the heart of those hearings. In front of the whole country and under oath, one of two people had lied. Since one of those people is now a Supreme Court Justice who cast a vote making George W. Bush President, the point is far from moot. And last week the mystery took another turn, thanks to former American Spectator character assassin David Brock, the man designated by the right to destroy Hill's reputation and scrub Thomas'. Brock confesses in a Talk magazine excerpt of his new book, Blinded by the Right, that he had printed "virtually every derogatory and often contradictory allegation" he could to make Hill seem "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty." If that was all Brock did, we might have nothing more than another sin committed on behalf of the vast right-wing conspiracy. But Brock, who has forged a second career as a recovering conservative, makes one admission that implicates Thomas. Brock says he used information that came indirectly from Thomas to force a retraction from a woman named Kaye Savage, who had come forward in support of Hill. Brock threatened to publicize vicious charges made by her ex-husband in a sealed child-custody dispute.

In an interview with TIME last week, Savage recalled her meeting with Brock in the lobby of the Marriott Hotel in downtown Washington in 1994. A book titled Strange Justice, by reporters Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson, had just come out — and it used on-the-record interviews to argue persuasively that Thomas had indeed subjected a number of women to frequent sexually explicit remarks about porno videos. Savage, a black mid-level aide in the Reagan Administration, told both the authors and the Judiciary Committee (although she wasn't called to testify publicly) that when she went to Thomas' apartment in the early 1980s, the place was littered with graphic photos of nude women. When Savage met Brock, she says, he let her know he could ruin her. "He knew all this personal stuff," she says. "He wanted me to take back what I had said. I couldn't — it was true — but I was intimidated, and so I faxed him something innocuous. I was scared."
http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,167355,00.html

So that's what you and yours are making light of.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

David Brock is Keyser Söze. [View all] geek tragedy Mar 2016 OP
it is his job....it is the point of his superpac virtualobserver Mar 2016 #1
No, but he's a sleazy, corrupt scumbag. That's enough. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #2
of course, he's opposing Bernie Sanders, he must be corrupt nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #3
He admitted spending years spreading deliberate lies for the GOP Kentonio Mar 2016 #11
you've established that he was corrupt nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #12
He's filth. If you can do that to another human being then you are intrinsically corrupted. Kentonio Mar 2016 #19
He's admitted it Jarqui Mar 2016 #29
You are defending the person who helped give us Clarence Thomas. Punkingal Mar 2016 #18
no I'm laughing at Sanders supporters who see his hand geek tragedy Mar 2016 #32
Yeah ha ha he called Anita Hill "slutty" and destroyed her. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #34
I disagree with that assessment. Punkingal Mar 2016 #37
He was a sleazebag a long time before that. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #61
he was good enough when he was defending Kerry and Obama. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #62
Not for me. What he did to Anita Hill was unforgivable. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #63
he was scum before bernie. it's his nature roguevalley Mar 2016 #53
. Dem2 Mar 2016 #4
He is the head of the "usual suspects," it seems. MineralMan Mar 2016 #5
David Brock's vile behavior is something to laugh about, sn't it? Punkingal Mar 2016 #20
There's lots to laugh about in these primary campaigns. MineralMan Mar 2016 #23
I don't laugh when Democrats cozy up to sleazy criminals tabasco Mar 2016 #36
Everyone is different, eh? MineralMan Mar 2016 #43
It takes all kinds, amirite? frylock Mar 2016 #60
+10 SHRED Mar 2016 #45
David Brock makes Susan Sarandon say and do stupid ass shit. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #6
David Brock was the inspiration for Barry Bostwick's character geek tragedy Mar 2016 #7
David Brock Aerows Mar 2016 #8
David Brock slimed Anita Hill TSIAS Mar 2016 #9
yes that did happen 30 years ago nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #10
And now he's using similar tactics against an opponent in a Dem primary Armstead Mar 2016 #22
^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #35
Clinton Ethics- We get to say anything, then say sorry, then say something worse. Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #40
Clarence Thomas was appointed by George H.W. Bush, for whom Elizabeth Warren voted. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #41
What's Warren got to do with your downplaying Brock's history? I'm no fan of Senator Warren's Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #50
I was actually a Sanders supporter back during that stupid bullshit geek tragedy Mar 2016 #51
Your analogy fails your argument, insofar as JackRiddler Mar 2016 #13
Nah, he's just an opportunistic rat fucker. morningfog Mar 2016 #14
You're defending David Brock? Prism Mar 2016 #15
Sucks to be David Brock Red Oak Mar 2016 #16
Oh - and he has to work with Hillary Clinton Red Oak Mar 2016 #17
legally he's not allowed to work with her at all geek tragedy Mar 2016 #28
I'm imagining the clandestine meetings Red Oak Mar 2016 #33
Kaye Savage, witness in the Thomas hearings, recalls her meeting with Brock: Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #44
Ummm, no... I'm Keyser Söze. kysrsoze Mar 2016 #21
I though Susan Sarandon was Keyser Söze. MineralMan Mar 2016 #24
Ha! Thank you for posting in this thread. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #27
Keyser soze had better hair Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #25
better theme music too nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #26
"waah SCOTUS!" whines the faction benefiting from CU, that didn't fight FL 2000, MisterP Mar 2016 #30
What a stupid OP eom PufPuf23 Mar 2016 #31
No, just an admitted slime merchant and misogynist- Smearing Anita Hill Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #38
no, I'm making fun of the fact that Bernie fans are treating him like the master geek tragedy Mar 2016 #39
No, you are making light of the known facts about Brock. It's very valid not to trust a person with Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #42
no, I am pointing out that someone who isn't even affiliated with Clinton's campaign geek tragedy Mar 2016 #46
Sure, whatever you need to tell yourself. I note that you still have not addressed what his actual Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #48
I've fully acknowledged he did really scummy things back then, it's not even deniable. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #49
You took part in the photos stuff, about 52 year old photos. But for Brock, 30 is just ancient times Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #55
David Brock is a sleazeball ass, and I don't care who you intend to vote for. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2016 #47
Wrong. He did call Anita Hill "a little nutty and a bit slutty" though. So there's that. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #52
Anything to defend a sleaze merchant I guess--If the sleaze merchant is for Hillary. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #54
Bullshit. All those things are my fault and everybody damn well knows it. bravenak Mar 2016 #56
Defend David Brock Day noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Mar 2016 #58
David Brock is the Democrat's version of Turd Blossom. frylock Mar 2016 #59
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»David Brock is Keyser Söz...»Reply #38