Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Yes, lying has a sex. merrily Mar 2016 #1
A few months of Sanders getting ribbed on comedy shows is not the same thing as 20 years CalvinballPro Mar 2016 #4
Your imagination is certainly active. I made no such request. If I had, you have no authority to merrily Mar 2016 #10
+1 daleanime Mar 2016 #38
Claiming sexism is pretty much all they have got now, I think. djean111 Mar 2016 #8
Sexism and racism. As it was in 2008, so it now and probably ever shall be. merrily Mar 2016 #11
. haikugal Mar 2016 #12
It all makes sense now..... daleanime Mar 2016 #41
. haikugal Mar 2016 #53
lol 840high Mar 2016 #74
This message was self-deleted by its author imari362 Mar 2016 #19
Glad you got a laugh. Those are rarer and rarer on DU anymore. merrily Mar 2016 #95
This message was self-deleted by its author imari362 Mar 2016 #97
John Edwards' hair, 2007 RadiationTherapy Mar 2016 #22
Yes, and that started a trail that led to his prosecution, but my hair comment was an aside. merrily Mar 2016 #28
No, of course not. Females' appearances are very much more scrutinized. RadiationTherapy Mar 2016 #45
Edwards haircut was neither a sexism issue nor a classism issue, but a use of campaign funds issue. merrily Mar 2016 #49
Well, it certainly is a classism issue to me - as is the notion that such behavior RadiationTherapy Mar 2016 #59
Had Edwards paid for the haircut from his own funds, as he had all his life, the price of the cut merrily Mar 2016 #65
All good. thanks for the chat. RadiationTherapy Mar 2016 #70
Ann Coulter used to call him "The Breck Girl"... Miles Archer Mar 2016 #71
I've just celebrated my 30th year of Barbering Jennylynn Mar 2016 #84
I agree! I couldn't believe it at the time either. But then I began to study communication RadiationTherapy Mar 2016 #86
nothing fries my butt like hearing words like they said here. What the roguevalley Mar 2016 #90
. merrily Mar 2016 #96
Poor, poor Hillary. She's just another powerless female being battered by the masses. Vinca Mar 2016 #2
Not only embarrassing, but damaging. I've sat on hiring committees. Trust me, it doesn't take merrily Mar 2016 #37
Nah. KPN Mar 2016 #3
Isn't it just as sexist that she as known as the most admired Woman in the world for 20 years. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #5
Different categories came into being for good reasons. merrily Mar 2016 #17
Ironic that you count a sister college whose existence is only due to the Ivy league not admitting dsc Mar 2016 #39
Was my comment ironic, or was my comment a function of reality at the time? It was Ivy League, not merrily Mar 2016 #44
Oconnor graduated law school in 52 dsc Mar 2016 #54
In the history of lawyers nearly two decades is not that long. merrily Mar 2016 #56
How does someone like that get most admired? admired for what? Hiraeth Mar 2016 #40
First Ladies have tended to get on most admired lists, but then they gradually disappear merrily Mar 2016 #51
Hillary has made it a point (her job) to stay in the public eye. Tenacity, she has it. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #52
I would say personal political ambition, but yes, persisting is usually part of merrily Mar 2016 #57
Of course she is ambitious but, -I- don't paticularly admire ambitious people. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #72
I merely observed that you and Iwould word our respective descriptions of her differently. merrily Mar 2016 #76
yes, it sounds like you are trying to argue with me. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #79
Calling Bullshit on Calling Sexist Bullshit Meteor Man Mar 2016 #6
What is it when you don't trust a man? whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #7
Same thing: lying. merrily Mar 2016 #18
That's what I figured whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #24
You lie, you say things that may be technically true, but are misleading because of what you leave merrily Mar 2016 #67
Oh please....fail. haikugal Mar 2016 #9
We didn't hold any other Secretary of State responsible... Blanks Mar 2016 #13
She was questioned, not jailed, ffs. That does not equate to being held responsible. merrily Mar 2016 #23
You think it's ok that they're using a different standard? Blanks Mar 2016 #82
My prior post explained that the situations are not the same at all. merrily Mar 2016 #83
'They' are racist as well as misogynist... Blanks Mar 2016 #94
So if Clinton gets the nomination, and B2G Mar 2016 #14
Does he even know what sexist means? Politicalboi Mar 2016 #15
What the Clinton supporters never tell you is what percentage of the vote Beowulf Mar 2016 #16
You're right...at least for 2015... Bodych Mar 2016 #25
Let me guess rock Mar 2016 #29
You are correct. It is a guess. Beowulf Mar 2016 #87
They should change it to "most famous woman" BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #46
I've wondered about that data... loyalsister Mar 2016 #89
When cornered, play the gender card Doctor_J Mar 2016 #20
Hillary has never lied and is perfect in every way except for her lack of a Y chromosome. Scuba Mar 2016 #21
Impressive. Even Mary Poppins was only practically perfect in every way! nt Buns_of_Fire Mar 2016 #58
Maybe it's because she's lied in the past that people expect she'll lie again revbones Mar 2016 #26
Really? Because I'm no fan of Bill either. Maybe it isn't an issue of gender. Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #27
Good point. He wasn't called "Slick Willie" and the "Teflon President" for nothing. merrily Mar 2016 #66
When you make false charges of sexism you are hurting people that really suffer from sexism. Skwmom Mar 2016 #30
Bingo-- Nail on head Armstead Mar 2016 #34
Great Comment (EOM) Bodych Mar 2016 #50
Of course it is Bjornsdotter Mar 2016 #31
I don't trust Ted Cruz either. He's not a female. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #32
I keep hearing this 'millennials don't trust Hillary' thing for a while and I've wondered at it. apnu Mar 2016 #33
Yep this is all they have. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #35
So I'm a sexist woman who is going to hell, then. GreenPartyVoter Mar 2016 #36
Not a lot of cards are left in that deck. Autumn Mar 2016 #42
Here's hoping the joker shows up soon. merrily Mar 2016 #55
NOW, the organization that changed their definition of sexual harrassment BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #43
Women can't be untrustworthy? arcane1 Mar 2016 #47
Hillary will be making a tragic mistake if she officially runs as a "woman" candidate. Zen Democrat Mar 2016 #48
Really? dr60omg Mar 2016 #60
just ask Qadafi how trustworthy she is AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #61
Terry O'Neill is spouting "sexist bullshit" k8conant Mar 2016 #62
Terry O'Neill trying to change the definition of sexual harrassment back BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #63
Why does O'Neill think I should trust this? It's patriarchy enforcing loads of bullshit: Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #64
All one has to do is listen Terry. Watch out for sniper fire along the way. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #68
oh wah! grasswire Mar 2016 #69
I don't agree with this. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #73
I had to k/r for the laughs. 840high Mar 2016 #75
Some say the same thing about Bill -- Is that also sexist? TheDormouse Mar 2016 #77
The sexism charge: a long dead horse beaten to a pulp. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #78
Bernie's criticisms would be sexist if he was Clinton Prism Mar 2016 #80
So my wife, a VP in a fairly big corp, is sexist?? jmg257 Mar 2016 #81
I never say this. I trust her. JackRiddler Mar 2016 #85
Reproductive health decisions? Does she mean the ones Hillary is against women making CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #88
That article starts with an interesting quote: Karma13612 Mar 2016 #91
omg.. dana_b Mar 2016 #92
Feminists are setting back their own cause with this kind of blather Armstead Mar 2016 #93
What nonsense. WestSeattle2 Mar 2016 #98
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NOW President Terry O'Nei...»Reply #61