2016 Postmortem

Lars39

(26,540 posts)

110. I've often wondered

Reply to B2G (Reply #109)

Fri Apr 1, 2016, 02:39 PM

Apr 2016

if and how much Bill Clinton was privy to State Dept business while Hillary was Secretary of State.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

141 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HuffPo: Dep. of Justice Joins FBI in Hillary Email Investigation, Use Subpoenas, Grand Juries. [View all] berni_mccoy Apr 2016 OP

Here is comes ... any second .... no really any second its going to happen ... JoePhilly Apr 2016 #1

Sweet pea, I don't know about any indictment fairy, but this issue IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #8

Usually see those phoney terms of endearment JoePhilly Apr 2016 #11

Urk. Apologies. It was condescending. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #118

Calling someone "sweet pea" - it came across when I read it later IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #119

Thank you. CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #122

This message was self-deleted by its author Mbrow Apr 2016 #89

I don't understand the significance to the discussion at hand? IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #91

This message was self-deleted by its author Mbrow Apr 2016 #92

Sorry Idabriggs your post was alerted on but I posted the wrong jury results, Mbrow Apr 2016 #93

Wow - Bless the Jury and Thank You! 0-7 Leave! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #96

Bernie is still losing.. So I don't why u r so gleeful.. asuhornets Apr 2016 #108

With respect, Secretary Clinton's actions have NOTHING to do with Bernie. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #113

Thank you Jury. 840high Apr 2016 #131

actually, the interviews will not be under oath, we learned yesterday. grasswire Apr 2016 #115

Well If She Continues To Believe That She Is The Smartest Person In The Room.. The Interview CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #117

I believe she is going to be under oath with the two CIVIL lawsuits IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #120

It'll be here in 24 business hours! greatauntoftriplets Apr 2016 #40

I'm with Bernie on this Dem2 Apr 2016 #111

Make a mountain out of a molehill Botany Apr 2016 #2

Benghazi & WhiteWater were witch hunts, email/server gate is not. She failed to turn over her docs peacebird Apr 2016 #5

She sent and received emails and her email account had a server too. So what? Botany Apr 2016 #6

Have you ever held a clearance? I did for decades. There are rules for handling classified material peacebird Apr 2016 #9

Sigh. NO. FACTUALLY INCORRECT. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #17

whew... she was one busy SOS... who would have guessed yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #31

That's a really good summary. one thing to add thereismore Apr 2016 #33

One point I disagree with... Lars39 Apr 2016 #100

Great catch - thank you! IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #103

Here it is... Lars39 Apr 2016 #105

Yep. Wonder what goodies they've found on it B2G Apr 2016 #109

I've often wondered Lars39 Apr 2016 #110

I think most of it is a pretty safe bet. nt B2G Apr 2016 #112

They worked as a team to rack up azmom Apr 2016 #128

And it's been reported she shared Blumenthal's emails with him. nt B2G Apr 2016 #136

So then I have to ask, What level of clearance does Bill Clinton have as a former president? Lars39 Apr 2016 #137

Who's Patreus? pinebox Apr 2016 #37

4-Star General, Director of CIA, Iraq War Hero - Who Blew It By Screwing Around IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #57

Petraeus (correct spelling) wasn't about email, was COMPLETELY different. Justice Apr 2016 #102

For the record, I was just answering the "who was he" question. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #104

well... pinebox Apr 2016 #106

They share something else Mnpaul Apr 2016 #114

... and, ironically, Hillary's FBI files scandal? AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #53

if Cheney did any of this, would you say the same? doubtful; amborin Apr 2016 #71

Obama has to move forward... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #3

What crimes, pray tell? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #36

Email Server and Clinton Foundation GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #46

Having an e-mail server and a charitable foundation is a crime? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #49

Oh, great analogy. B2G Apr 2016 #50

Thank you... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #51

I think the assumption was that since you were participating in the dicussion revbones Apr 2016 #59

When she is exonerated I am sure you will apologize for the calumnies hoisted upon her. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #60

For explaining what the other poster was trying to tell you revbones Apr 2016 #61

I was taught to withhold judgment... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #62

Did I shoot anything when I was explaining? revbones Apr 2016 #63

You seemed to have cast aspersions on the Clinton's charitable endeavors. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #66

Where aside from relating what was in the publicly released emails? revbones Apr 2016 #75

If you believe a man and his wife DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #79

Misrepresent what I said all you want. It doesn't change the facts. revbones Apr 2016 #84

on their first date, Bill and Hillary crossed a picket line. nt grasswire Apr 2016 #116

Pssst. It's the other part - the arms deal quid pro quo. kristopher Apr 2016 #90

I would hope Hillary 840high Apr 2016 #132

I would hope you would apologize for the calumnies you have foisted upon her. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #135

Close your eyes - it will 840high Apr 2016 #138

Please see Post #135 DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #139

Urk - it's a bit more complicated than that. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #65

You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. I would ... DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #69

At the end of the day, the opinions that matter are FBI and Justice Department. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #81

wow.... yourpaljoey Apr 2016 #4

Wow, that is a brutal article. Really lays it out. peacebird Apr 2016 #7

First of all, calling it a "Clinton Scandal" is a virtual guarantee of Clinton's innocence. baldguy Apr 2016 #10

Wow, that's an extremely twisted view of the facts. Sorry for you. berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #12

Lol, that'l is the funniest things I've read. Love it! morningfog Apr 2016 #15

Jesus Christ-- first you insist there's zero corporate money in politics, and now... Marr Apr 2016 #72

"Clinton Scandal" means it's bullshit, made up, has no basis in fact. baldguy Apr 2016 #77

Again... Marr Apr 2016 #78

What world do they live in? Unbelievable. 840high Apr 2016 #141

This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #121

As a friend to the lgbtq community I find the term "transexual" patently offensive. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #13

Wow, nitpicking any source now? Not HA Goodman so have to find any fault possible in any source? berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #16

Please read this slowly DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #18

I don't think. I know. It's obvious to all. berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #20

Do you think for a second I care what your associates think of me? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #22

If that's so, why the hell are you responding? Again, it's obvious. berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #26

Your tone DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #29

Ah, I see going after Tone like Brock-O'Keefe went after Bernie's tone? Lovely berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #39

I am glad you are speaking to me in a hostile and threatening tone. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #42

LOL, nothing like accusing the victim of what you yourself are doing. Thanks for the demonstration. berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #55

I am glad there is a record. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #58

I'm glad too. Your objectivity is laughable. But I'll let you have the last word... berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #64

Thank you for letting me have the last word. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #68

I noticed he didn't cite any references for his story. WhiteTara Apr 2016 #34

IMHO, I would file it under creative writing and not journalism. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #35

It sure is. Too bad this is such a serious matter WhiteTara Apr 2016 #38

Partisan gruel; any sentient person wouldn't rely on it. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #45

Which is weird because it's not a particularly offensive term Prism Apr 2016 #88

You have no idea who I am. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #98

If there was a Grand Jury, why would Comey interview Clinton personally BlueStateLib Apr 2016 #14

He wouldn't. baldguy Apr 2016 #19

There is no way of knowing whether there is a grand jury. But, if there is, Hillary isn't the target morningfog Apr 2016 #23

No where did Shuster's report say Comey was personally going to. Mediaite used it as a headline. berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #25

Professional courtesy. She was SoS, not further down the food Karma13612 Apr 2016 #125

LOL. Another nutjob basing an article on Joseph DiGenova's analysis. DanTex Apr 2016 #24

I don't think prior SOSs used private servers. n/t Skwmom Apr 2016 #27

They did not TeddyR Apr 2016 #47

That's correct, they didn't... tex-wyo-dem Apr 2016 #83

Yea, correct. Only private email accounts, if I understand correctly. Eom Karma13612 Apr 2016 #123

It's Fitzmas all over again!! Oh goody. nt hack89 Apr 2016 #28

Does that cast Hillary in the role of Dubya? Jester Messiah Apr 2016 #73

No. It just shows what happens when hope, hate and gullibility intersect. Nt hack89 Apr 2016 #95

Nailed it! COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #129

Who is Tom Pappalardo? WhiteTara Apr 2016 #30

He also is very insensitive. Please see Post #13 DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #32

Same reason MSM is not reporting on Bernie's campaign. nt thereismore Apr 2016 #43

MSM are all over scandals, and btw WhiteTara Apr 2016 #44

Get the popcorn, this is getting good! pinebox Apr 2016 #41

I just figured this out. APRIL FOOL WhiteTara Apr 2016 #48

you wish awake Apr 2016 #54

If it's true "according to knowledgeable people of these laws" that cheapdate Apr 2016 #52

Read the article... berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #56

Read the article. cheapdate Apr 2016 #94

No. She and Madeleine Allbright did NOT use email for State Dept business. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #74

I said Rice, not Powell. cheapdate Apr 2016 #80

It was a ".gov" account and the key word was "occasionally" - IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #87

Condoleeza Rice did not have her own personal SERVER. Karma13612 Apr 2016 #124

Drip, drip, drip, drip.... PonyUp Apr 2016 #67

The Clinton campaign had this to say: Marr Apr 2016 #70

And like all of the other "full blown scandals" it will be proven overblown. Nothing criminal or Jitter65 Apr 2016 #76

It does't matter ... salinsky Apr 2016 #85

What is really sad is that no matter what evidence comes to light Kentonio Apr 2016 #140

They have been crying "wolf" for so long, it is hard for many to realize IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #97

The writer, Tom Papillardo, does a nice job of pulling together KoKo Apr 2016 #82

Third Way DOJ? Aaaannnnd under the rug goes the investigation. nt Zorra Apr 2016 #86

Not so sure about that. Karma13612 Apr 2016 #127

Delicious. frylock Apr 2016 #99

Was it one of those "Hard Choices" not to follow the rules or just another "mistake"? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #101

Shouldn't you posting the bullshit... jcgoldie Apr 2016 #107

Why? You want to read 840high Apr 2016 #133

This article is crap. Vattel Apr 2016 #126

The fact that she thought she could get away azmom Apr 2016 #130

.that^ X100 840high Apr 2016 #134