Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Parents of Aurora victim slam Sanders over gun bill support [View all]
Parents of a victim of the 2012 shooting in Aurora, Colo., joined a Hillary Clinton campaign call on Friday and slammed Bernie Sanders for his past support of a measure that resulted in them owing $200,000 in legal fees after suing the online retailer who sold bullets to their daughter's killer.
Speaking to reporters, Lonnie and Sandy Phillips, the parents of Jessica Ghawi, explained how a 2005 law Sanders supported gave immunity to gun dealers including the retailer they sued. Their lawsuit against the retailer was thrown out because of that law, the parents told reporters.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/274918-parents-of-aurora-victim-slams-sanders-over-gun-bill
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
41 replies, 4534 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How does one get shot to death by a murderer who shouldn't have a gun due to "negligence" exactly?
CalvinballPro
Apr 2016
#5
If the store follows the law and legally sells a gun to a citizen they should not be liable...
GeorgiaPeanuts
Apr 2016
#6
Tell me, precisely, how a car meant for transport is like able to a gun meant for death? nt
msanthrope
Apr 2016
#7
A car can be used to cause death, remember the wife that ran over her husband
GeorgiaPeanuts
Apr 2016
#8
But that is not its manufactured purpose. You conflate purpose and use, at your logical peril. nt
msanthrope
Apr 2016
#9
We don't have to defend the gunz. the Constitution as it's interpreted defends the gunz
Autumn
Apr 2016
#19
"..that resulted in them owing $200,000 in legal fees". These poor people got very bad legal advice.
jmg257
Apr 2016
#3
IIRC, it was a Colorado law that resulted in them owing fees, and the suit was (could have
petronius
Apr 2016
#32
did louisville slugger get any kind of sweetheart deal from Bernie Sanders
geek tragedy
Apr 2016
#23
Not sure - were people suing Louisville Slugger for criminal misuse of their bats?
jmg257
Apr 2016
#25
CDC has been banned from studying deaths by the same general group of people
geek tragedy
Apr 2016
#30
they said that Bernie personally promised them he'd come up with a comprehensive gun reform
geek tragedy
Apr 2016
#17
If the retailer sold the bullets LEGALLY there is no there there! I am anti-gun but jeez this is
jillan
Apr 2016
#33
Why do Hillary and her supporters continue to exploit these poor people?
beam me up scottie
Apr 2016
#38