2016 Postmortem

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)

29. #whichHillary...

Reply to bravenak (Original post)

Mon Apr 4, 2016, 02:04 PM

Apr 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

188 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We'll Never Know: 20 Legitimate Questions the American Media Refuses to Ask Bernie Sanders [View all] bravenak Apr 2016 OP

We'll never know what was in the transcripts... nt revbones Apr 2016 #1

Either that's a parody site, or it's performing research on people with Obsessive Fixation Disorder. TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #93

the hill camp is on a roll passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #186

His religion ? Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #2

Not one of the questions. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #7

You KNOW what my point is. Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #14

I don't KNOW what your point is ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #38

It would seem to be the only thing that matters to some people. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #39

Nonsense. murielm99 Apr 2016 #119

Funny, I wasn't addressing you, I don't even know who you are, Fozzledick Apr 2016 #124

That's funny. murielm99 Apr 2016 #164

Of course you're free to post meaningless non-sequitors. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #180

A whif of propaganda in the morning nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #3

It will be interesting when the primaries are over to see what questions are asked ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #4

I think they will tear him apart like a pack of rabid dogs bravenak Apr 2016 #6

There is already petitions and some real action to unseat him in the Senate ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #9

I think he needs to be primaried bravenak Apr 2016 #13

He should join the Democratic Socialist party ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #17

Hell yeah. If they will have him at this point bravenak Apr 2016 #22

LOL! TSIAS Apr 2016 #97

Petitions and serious attempts to unseat him. Or so they claim. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #126

Don't worry about that, he's going to be President soon Politicalboi Apr 2016 #102

So funny angrychair Apr 2016 #134

Wow I didn't know that. Can you point me to where I can find out more? cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #125

Bravenak, calm down. You are like leading the pack of rabid dogs. 7wo7rees Apr 2016 #156

When a person is on record as saying they hate Jews, it's hard to take their Marr Apr 2016 #5

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #10

Right? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #15

I find antisemitism, and those who excuse it, a lot more disturbing than Marr Apr 2016 #18

Have a gif it's soothing ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #24

There is no mention of religion in the 20 questions in the article. R B Garr Apr 2016 #69

They don't care, they only wanted to derail the discussion. nt stevenleser Apr 2016 #187

Don't let them fool you Rob H. Apr 2016 #136

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #20

Yeah I get that ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #23

No lives. bravenak Apr 2016 #25

Speaking of 'feelings of grandeur'. Marr Apr 2016 #37

How disingenuous ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #40

Look, I realize you're some kind of fan of this person, but believe me-- Marr Apr 2016 #47

I'm so very glad you care enough to take the time to post a gif to tell me you don't care. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #49

"there is considerable more to "know" about Bravenek " jack_krass Apr 2016 #122

There is no mention of religion in this posted article. R B Garr Apr 2016 #81

Because bravenak has previously professed her hatred of Jews, and constantly posts Marr Apr 2016 #82

That's not how I've read bravenak's posts. So there must be another reason for attacking her R B Garr Apr 2016 #85

Her comments were unambiguously antisemitic. Marr Apr 2016 #94

Actually, this looks like an excuse to get posts hidden. This is just the latest angle. R B Garr Apr 2016 #104

"So there must be another reason for attacking her" Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #174

Haha, you really outed yourself with this one. I've already said what R B Garr Apr 2016 #175

"Previously" So you're dragging religion into a discussion that never mentioned religion before.... George II Apr 2016 #90

Not if they had previously professed hatred for women, no. Of course not. Marr Apr 2016 #100

Oh, really? murielm99 Apr 2016 #121

I got a hide for mentioning the brick post, murielm. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #155

Thank you, sheshe2. murielm99 Apr 2016 #165

But you can't substantiate your charge, clearly rendering it false. George II Apr 2016 #133

Here you go George riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #139

You're asking me to post bravenak's antisemitic comments? /nt Marr Apr 2016 #141

I know you won't be able to, so yes. George II Apr 2016 #142

Sorry, not taking your hide bait. Bravenak has acknowledged it herself, so I really Marr Apr 2016 #143

I must be on George's ignore list. Ah well everyone else can see it riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #145

This message was self-deleted by its author Marr Apr 2016 #146

Brick posts stand. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #166

So you want people to post the link to what she said Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #111

I believe that's considered contacting and attacking her family. Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #115

Crazy what it's come to Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #127

I've mentioned this for months, going back to last summer when the bogus charge.... George II Apr 2016 #132

It looks like what you've posted about Bravnek is mistaken uponit7771 Apr 2016 #153

Save your breath. Bravenak has admitted it herself. Marr Apr 2016 #157

On DU?! They weren't hidden?! You were already getting the side eye... this is bananas uponit7771 Apr 2016 #158

Go on making excuses for bigotry. Marr Apr 2016 #159

Asking a rational question isn't making excuses for anything, but not answering logical and uponit7771 Apr 2016 #160

Jury's in Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #71

Looks like someone is methodically alerting on every one of this posters posts in this thread...nt SidDithers Apr 2016 #74

Well. Looks like all the hides are pretty reasonable hides. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #78

I've been beginning to wonder if 12 hides was the new de facto limit. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #109

Somebody has to hit 20. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #112

Since she's a Hillary supporter Rob H. Apr 2016 #138

None of these hides are close. They're all 5-2 or 6-1 riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #79

Of course it's your well considered and honest opinion whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #89

. Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #113

Yup, that's what it looks like, exactly. Abuse of the system. R B Garr Apr 2016 #114

She's the victim here Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #117

Or when they post really horrible things. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #130

So you can answer where religion is mentioned in the article she posted? nt R B Garr Apr 2016 #131

Yeap, and its pathetic uponit7771 Apr 2016 #154

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #80

Yes, but it's being promoted by *you*. Marr Apr 2016 #16

. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #19

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #21

So? /nt Marr Apr 2016 #26

Exactly. bravenak Apr 2016 #27

So? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #28

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #31

I know that's right ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #36

You can't attack the message, so you atack the messenger lunamagica Apr 2016 #41

Will Pitt was hounded for years after his POSUC statement riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #48

This from so called "progressives". Shame on them lunamagica Apr 2016 #55

And that was an expression used for decades in media reportiong nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #56

No one has to forget and pretend her motives are not know as she continues with her bias motivated Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #50

What? Are you saying that she can't support Hillary anymore, and must not be critical of Sanders to lunamagica Apr 2016 #54

You know what really bothers me--to the point I actually do care? ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #60

Who are "her people"? Jew haters? Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #75

Are you sure she was talking about Jews? Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #98

I thought everyone loved Smurfs tkmorris Apr 2016 #105

Oh yes, poor bravenak-- VICTIM of antisemitism. Marr Apr 2016 #83

I think technically she'd be a victim of "anti-anti-semitism." Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #106

Calling someone out on racism is not racism. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #84

I'm saying her continued smearing of a minority candidate after proclaiming hatered of that minority Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #144

Bigotry? Show me the bigotry in the OP? lunamagica Apr 2016 #147

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #171

Hey Aloha, girl~ Cha Apr 2016 #182

Cha! lunamagica Apr 2016 #185

Oh, please. Marr Apr 2016 #59

+10000 nt riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #65

She is not an anti-Semite. She started out as a Sander's supporter lunamagica Apr 2016 #66

Uh-huh. Marr Apr 2016 #68

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #137

To be fair, she posted an apology in GD:P, iirc Rob H. Apr 2016 #140

Thank you for the correction. Marr Apr 2016 #162

Funny thing is melman Apr 2016 #163

+1 treestar Apr 2016 #99

Come now. bvf Apr 2016 #151

i will SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #35

. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #12

No kidding. Months of attacking a minority candidate then admiting to bigotry against that minority. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #43

Not only that, but she has admitted she doesn't even like Clinton. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #123

Well she certainly spoke strongly against Hillary and Bill in 2014 Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #173

+1 Go Vols Apr 2016 #64

21. Will he remain a 'Democrat' after he loses the nomination? nt onehandle Apr 2016 #8

Answer: HELL NO bravenak Apr 2016 #11

Will you go back to being an open anti-semite after the election? HERVEPA Apr 2016 #44

Interesting transparency page you have there. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #46

Look real hard at any post of mine. You will not find anything the slightest bit racist or bigoted. HERVEPA Apr 2016 #52

Naw. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #63

Wonderful non-responsive answer HERVEPA Apr 2016 #73

#whichHillary... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #29

Have a gif it's soothing ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #30

hahaha rbrnmw Apr 2016 #33

Excellent article, Bravenak! lunamagica Apr 2016 #32

Hey!! bravenak Apr 2016 #34

I can't believe the hide lunamagica Apr 2016 #42

I can believe it ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #45

They are livid that she posted the artcle with 20 valid questions, which will become issues lunamagica Apr 2016 #51

The OP linked to the People's View, a blog by a troll banned from DU. No one will even read the Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #57

I'm sorry, but regardless of who wrote that, all those questions will come up if he he gets the lunamagica Apr 2016 #61

"No one will even read the wall of bullshit at the link." SMC22307 Apr 2016 #91

Who was the troll that was banned by DU? Unwanted Democrat Apr 2016 #108

Notice the very different use of words by those hidden and those not. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #86

I believe posting jury scores constitutes posting her personal information Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #120

Is there any question there I need the answer to? immoderate Apr 2016 #53

I have one question for Clinton that they won't ask unapatriciated Apr 2016 #58

Stop with the deflection. Start your own thread if you want lunamagica Apr 2016 #67

My question is just as legitimate unapatriciated Apr 2016 #76

But you are deflecting from thr OP. Sorry you can't handle the 20 questions lunamagica Apr 2016 #92

Stop embarrassing yourself. Jester Messiah Apr 2016 #62

OP is Flagged For Review Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #70

She'll be back before tomorrow morning. Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #87

Maybe a new letter will come into play Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #95

I give it eight hours. He'll be harangued by a couple of protected groups... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #88

The rancor is totally understandable Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #96

Indeed it is. Wonder if the United States Postmaster General... SMC22307 Apr 2016 #101

It's coming from inside the house! Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #103

Sgt. Sacker to the rescue! (n/t) SMC22307 Apr 2016 #107

People's view...trash thread, lol. morningfog Apr 2016 #72

These questions are rather absurd. CRITICAL LITERACY PLEASE dr60omg Apr 2016 #77

I like question no 12 Gothmog Apr 2016 #110

Yes!! Actually, all these questions are just brilliant. The whole thing is done very well --- R B Garr Apr 2016 #118

There are good reasons why Sanders is not appealing to African American and other voters Gothmog Apr 2016 #176

Question azureblue Apr 2016 #116

Limbaugh would love this clown ... GeorgeGist Apr 2016 #128

Pathetic smear attempt. UNREC (NT) jack_krass Apr 2016 #129

20 Questions? You're joking right? The article had 147 question marks! cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #135

Lol, geez that article is dumb. Vattel Apr 2016 #183

They forgot "What was your involvement in whistler162 Apr 2016 #148

K&R sheshe2 Apr 2016 #149

Posts hidden by Jury: 12 SixString Apr 2016 #150

K&R Jamaal510 Apr 2016 #152

Thank you, bravenak! Excellent questions~ Cha Apr 2016 #161

Well, lucky for all of us that I'm one of those DUers who do listen to you, Bravenak... Violet_Crumble Apr 2016 #167

As always... it's good to see you, Violet! kdmorris Apr 2016 #168

It's good to see you too, kdmorris... Violet_Crumble Apr 2016 #169

Well, my twins got bigger and more mobile kdmorris Apr 2016 #172

DU Rec Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #170

The flag remains. SMC22307 Apr 2016 #177

It will be interesting to see for how long. Fozzledick Apr 2016 #179

Remember the Pledge Queen? SMC22307 Apr 2016 #181

I forgot about that one. m-lekktor Apr 2016 #184

Maybe Frontpage Mag Fozzledick Apr 2016 #178

Since you are too lazy to include a four paragraph excerpt, I am too lazy to click on your link. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #188